• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于治疗糖尿病足溃疡患者干预措施结局报告的系统评价。

A systematic review of outcome reporting for interventions to treat people with diabetic foot ulceration.

作者信息

Dovell George, Staniszewska Aleksandra, Ramirez Jozel, Murray Ines, Ambler Graeme K, Twine Christopher P, Hinchliffe Robert J

机构信息

Centre for Surgical Research, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Department of Vascular Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2021 Oct;38(10):e14664. doi: 10.1111/dme.14664. Epub 2021 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1111/dme.14664
PMID:34324741
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) is a challenging clinical problem that affects up to a quarter of patients with diabetes in their lifetime. An agreed set of outcomes for assessing treatments or interventions for DFU has not previously been considered. The aim of this study was to identify outcomes that are reported in clinical studies assessing a treatment or intervention for DFU, to inform the development of a core outcome set (COS).

METHODS

Systematic literature searches were performed between January 2016 and March 2019. The search strategy was pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019128250). Two authors independently screened abstracts for full text review. Outcomes were extracted from selected papers verbatim and categorized into domains according to established taxonomy. Consistency of outcome reporting was assessed. Overlapping outcomes were merged independently to condense the extracted list of outcomes for use in forthcoming consensus processes.

RESULTS

Of 4645 abstracts identified, 114 studies met the inclusion criteria. There were 69 randomized studies, 40 prospective studies and 5 protocols. Some 948 outcomes were extracted verbatim. Outcome reporting was consistent for 474 (53%) outcomes. De-duplication left 714 unique verbatim outcomes across 33 domains. Merging of overlapping unique verbatim outcomes established 95 merged outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study describes contemporary outcomes reported in studies assessing interventions for DFU. Outcome reporting is considered to be poor as it was consistent in just over half of outcomes extracted. Merging of outcomes has identified 95 outcomes that can be taken forward in the development of a COS.

摘要

背景

糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)是一个具有挑战性的临床问题,一生中影响多达四分之一的糖尿病患者。此前尚未考虑过一套用于评估DFU治疗或干预措施的商定结果。本研究的目的是确定在评估DFU治疗或干预措施的临床研究中报告的结果,为核心结局集(COS)的制定提供信息。

方法

于2016年1月至2019年3月进行了系统的文献检索。检索策略已在PROSPERO(CRD42019128250)上预先注册。两位作者独立筛选摘要以进行全文审查。从选定的论文中逐字提取结果,并根据既定分类法将其分类到各个领域。评估结果报告的一致性。对重叠的结果进行独立合并,以浓缩提取的结果列表,用于即将进行的共识过程。

结果

在识别出的4645篇摘要中,114项研究符合纳入标准。其中有69项随机研究、40项前瞻性研究和5项方案。共逐字提取了约948个结果。474个(53%)结果的报告是一致的。去重后在33个领域留下了714个独特的逐字结果。重叠独特逐字结果的合并产生了95个合并结果。

结论

本研究描述了评估DFU干预措施的研究中报告的当代结果。结果报告被认为较差,因为在提取的结果中只有略多于一半的结果是一致的。结果合并确定了95个结果,可用于COS的制定。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of outcome reporting for interventions to treat people with diabetic foot ulceration.一项关于治疗糖尿病足溃疡患者干预措施结局报告的系统评价。
Diabet Med. 2021 Oct;38(10):e14664. doi: 10.1111/dme.14664. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
2
Systematic Review of Outcome Reporting for Interventions to Treat Patients with Acute Lower Limb Ischaemia.系统评价治疗急性下肢缺血患者干预措施的结局报告。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024 Nov;68(5):600-604. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.07.042. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
3
A Narrative Review of the Use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Individuals With Diabetic Foot Ulceration.神经肌肉电刺激在糖尿病足溃疡患者中的应用的叙述性综述。
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2020 Sep;19(3):242-250. doi: 10.1177/1534734619898978. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
4
A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of prognostic factors for foot ulceration in people with diabetes: the international research collaboration for the prediction of diabetic foot ulcerations (PODUS).糖尿病患者足部溃疡预后因素的系统评价与个体患者数据荟萃分析:糖尿病足溃疡预测国际研究协作组(PODUS)
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(57):1-210. doi: 10.3310/hta19570.
5
Systematic review of clinical outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials of burn care.烧伤护理随机对照试验临床结局报告的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 15;9(2):e025135. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025135.
6
A systematic review of reported outcomes in people with lower limb chronic venous insufficiency of the deep veins.下肢深静脉慢性静脉功能不全患者报告结局的系统评价。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2023 Mar;11(2):422-431.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.09.014. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
7
A systematic review investigating the identification, causes, and outcomes of delays in the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia and diabetic foot ulceration.一项系统评价研究了慢性肢体威胁性缺血和糖尿病足溃疡管理延迟的识别、原因和结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Feb;71(2):669-681.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.229. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
8
Economic evaluations considering costs and outcomes of diabetic foot ulcer infections: A systematic review.考虑糖尿病足溃疡感染的成本和结果的经济评估:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 30;15(4):e0232395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232395. eCollection 2020.
9
A systematic review on reported outcomes and outcome measures in female idiopathic chronic pelvic pain for the development of a core outcome set.一项针对女性特发性慢性盆腔痛报告结局和结局测量的系统评价,旨在制定核心结局集。
BJOG. 2021 Mar;128(4):628-634. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16412. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
10
Perceptions and experiences of diabetic foot ulceration and foot care in people with diabetes: A qualitative meta-synthesis.糖尿病患者对糖尿病足溃疡和足部护理的认知和体验:定性综合分析。
Int Wound J. 2019 Feb;16(1):183-210. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13010. Epub 2018 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Core Outcome Set for Studies Assessing Interventions for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration.制定用于评估糖尿病相关足部溃疡干预措施的研究的核心结局集。
Diabetes Care. 2024 Nov 1;47(11):1958-1968. doi: 10.2337/dc24-1112.
2
Development of Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Patients with Diabetic Foot and Its Reliability and Validity Test.糖尿病足患者报告结局量表的研制及其信效度检验
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2023 Sep 20;16:2921-2927. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S419841. eCollection 2023.
3
Extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: An updated systematic review.
体外冲击波疗法与标准护理治疗糖尿病足溃疡愈合的比较:更新的系统评价。
Int Wound J. 2023 Aug;20(6):2303-2320. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14035. Epub 2022 Dec 3.