• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development of Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Patients with Diabetic Foot and Its Reliability and Validity Test.糖尿病足患者报告结局量表的研制及其信效度检验
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2023 Sep 20;16:2921-2927. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S419841. eCollection 2023.
2
The localization and improvement of the Functional Status Scale and the reliability and validity in very low birth weight infants.极低出生体重儿功能状态量表的本地化及信效度研究。
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Nov 25;51(5):603-612. doi: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2022-0336.
3
Development and validation of a brief diabetic foot risk screening scale for diabetic patients.糖尿病患者简易糖尿病足风险筛查量表的研制与验证
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Aug 5;7:100230. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100230. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
[Sinicization, cross-cultural adjustment and reliability and validity test of the Burnt Hand Outcome Tool].《烧伤手部结局工具的中国化、跨文化调适及信效度检验》
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2021 Oct 20;37(10):978-986. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210201-00042.
5
Adaptation and Validation of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form Scale for Chinese Diabetic Foot Ulcers Individuals.中文糖尿病足溃疡量表-简表的适应与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 6;19(21):14568. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114568.
6
[Development of questionnaire on influencing factors of quality of life in patients with sudden deafness based on Green model].基于格林模型的突发性聋患者生活质量影响因素调查问卷的研制
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 May;34(5):411-416. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.05.006.
7
Development and validation of the family management scale for children with asthma (FMSCA).儿童哮喘家庭管理量表(FMSCA)的编制与验证
J Asthma. 2020 Apr;57(4):441-451. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1571085. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
8
Developing and Testing the Validity and Reliability of the Brief Adolescent Respiratory System Health Assessment Scale-Student Version in a Chinese Sample.在中国样本中开发并测试青少年呼吸系统健康简易评估量表-学生版的有效性和可靠性。
Front Pediatr. 2021 Aug 17;9:713066. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.713066. eCollection 2021.
9
Turkish Adaptation of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form.糖尿病足溃疡量表-简化版的土耳其语适应性研究。
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2020 Sep;19(3):269-274. doi: 10.1177/1534734620921036. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
10
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Diabetic Foot Self-Care Questionnaire of the University of Malaga (DFSQUMA).马拉加大学糖尿病足自我护理问卷土耳其语版本(DFSQUMA)的效度和信度
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2023 Oct 31:15347346231209205. doi: 10.1177/15347346231209205.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of Resina Draconis for wound repair in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.龙血竭在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中促进创面愈合的疗效和安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2023 Feb;50:101707. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101707. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
2
Artificial Intelligence Methodologies Applied to Technologies for Screening, Diagnosis and Care of the Diabetic Foot: A Narrative Review.人工智能方法在糖尿病足筛查、诊断和护理技术中的应用:叙事性综述。
Biosensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 8;12(11):985. doi: 10.3390/bios12110985.
3
Effect of Nursing Intervention on Promoting Healing of RW in Patients with Diabetic Foot: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.护理干预对促进糖尿病足患者 RW 愈合的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Oct 14;2022:8284870. doi: 10.1155/2022/8284870. eCollection 2022.
4
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Quality of Life in People Affected by Diabetic Foot: A Psychometric Systematic Review.受糖尿病足影响人群的生活质量患者报告结局测量指标:心理测量系统评价。
Value Health. 2022 Sep;25(9):1602-1618. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.04.1737. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
5
Efficacy of Topical Wound Oxygen Therapy in Healing Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.局部创面氧疗治疗慢性糖尿病足溃疡的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2023 Apr;12(4):177-186. doi: 10.1089/wound.2022.0041. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
6
Ultrasound-Assisted Wound (UAW) Debridement in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.超声辅助伤口清创术治疗糖尿病足溃疡:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 30;11(7):1911. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071911.
7
The Impact of Hospitalization for Diabetic Foot Infection on Health-Related Quality of Life: Utilizing PROMIS.糖尿病足感染住院对健康相关生活质量的影响:利用 PROMIS。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Mar-Apr;61(2):227-232. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
8
A systematic review of outcome reporting for interventions to treat people with diabetic foot ulceration.一项关于治疗糖尿病足溃疡患者干预措施结局报告的系统评价。
Diabet Med. 2021 Oct;38(10):e14664. doi: 10.1111/dme.14664. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
9
Diabetic foot disease: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures.糖尿病足病:患者报告结局测量的系统文献回顾。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Dec;30(12):3395-3405. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02892-4. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
10
Chopart Amputation: Questioning the Clinical Efficacy of a Long-standing Surgical Option for Diabetic Foot Infection.Chopart 截肢术:质疑长期以来作为糖尿病足感染手术选择的临床疗效。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Aug 15;28(16):684-691. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00757.

糖尿病足患者报告结局量表的研制及其信效度检验

Development of Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Patients with Diabetic Foot and Its Reliability and Validity Test.

作者信息

Wang Xuanyu, Hu Xiaojie, Que Huafa

机构信息

Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2023 Sep 20;16:2921-2927. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S419841. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/DMSO.S419841
PMID:37750093
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10518140/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To construct a self-reported outcome scale for diabetic foot patients, and to test its reliability and validity.

METHODS

Through literature reading and interviews with 30 patients, a pool of scale items was formed. The items were classified and sorted out according to the expected scale structure framework. After two rounds of expert consultation and a small range of test dressing, the initial scale was formed. Through the investigation of 85 patients with diabetic foot, item differentiation analysis, correlation analysis and exploratory factor analysis were used to screen the items. Cronbach's α coefficient, retest reliability and content and structure validity analysis were used to determine the feasibility and validity of the scale.

RESULTS

The final scale included 4 first-level items and 22 second-level items. The critical ratio method showed that the scores of each item in the high group and the low group were significantly different (P < 0.05). Correlation analysis showed that the correlation coefficient between each item and the total score was 0.431 to 0.829; The content validity index of the scale was 0.91, the exploratory factor analysis identified three common factors, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 75.381%. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fit well. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.934 and the retest reliability coefficient was 0.926.

CONCLUSION

The self-reported outcome scale for diabetic foot patients has good reliability and validity, and can be used to investigate the health status of diabetic foot patients and evaluate the therapeutic effect.

摘要

目的

构建糖尿病足患者自我报告结局量表,并检验其信效度。

方法

通过文献阅读及对30例患者进行访谈,形成量表条目池。按照预期的量表结构框架对条目进行分类整理。经过两轮专家咨询及小范围预测试,形成初始量表。通过对85例糖尿病足患者进行调查,采用条目区分度分析、相关性分析及探索性因子分析筛选条目。采用Cronbach's α系数、重测信度以及内容效度和结构效度分析来确定量表的可行性和有效性。

结果

最终量表包括4个一级条目和22个二级条目。临界比法显示高分组与低分组各条目的得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。相关性分析显示各条目与总分的相关系数为0.431~0.829;量表的内容效度指数为0.91,探索性因子分析提取出3个公因子,累积方差贡献率为75.381%。验证性因子分析显示模型拟合良好。量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.934,重测信度系数为0.926。

结论

糖尿病足患者自我报告结局量表具有良好的信效度,可用于调查糖尿病足患者的健康状况及评估治疗效果。