Major Matthew, Long Graham W, Eden Christine L, Studzinski Diane M, Callahan Rose E, Brown O William
Department of Surgery, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Mich.
Department of Surgery, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Mich.
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):136-143.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.122. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
This study evaluated the incidence and long-term outcomes of postoperative type 1a endoleak (PT1a) following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).
A retrospective review of consecutive aortoiliac EVARs performed at a single institution from June 2006 to June 2012 was conducted. Patients with PT1a were identified by postoperative imaging and compared with those who did not develop a PT1a. Late outcomes were also studied of a subset of patients with PT1a who had persistent intraoperative type 1a endoleak (iT1a) on completion angiogram during EVAR that had resolved on initial follow-up imaging.
Three hundred eighty-nine patients underwent EVAR with median follow-up of 87 months (interquartile range, 64-111 months). The incidence of PT1a was 8.2% (n = 32) with a median follow-up of 74 months (interquartile range, 52-138 months). Compared with the total cohort, those who developed PT1a were statistically more likely to be female (32% vs 17%; P = .03) and have a higher all-cause mortality (71% vs 40%; P < .01) and aneurysm-related mortality (15.6% vs 1.7%; P < .01). Median time to presentation was 52 months. Of the 32 patients with PT1a, five (15.6%) presented with aortic rupture, of which three underwent extension cuff placement, one had open graft explant, and one declined intervention. Six patients in total (18.7%) declined intervention; five of these died of nonaneurysmal causes and one remains alive. Of the 26 patients with PT1a who had intervention, 21 (80.7%) showed resolution of PT1a, and five (19.2%) had recurrence. For patients with recurrent PT1a, two had resulting aneurysm-related mortality, two endoleaks resolved after relining with an endograft, and one patient declined intervention but remains alive. Patients with PT1a who had intervention with resolution showed no significant difference in median survival estimates (140.0 months) compared with the remaining EVAR cohort (120.0 months; P = .80). Within the PT1a cohort, 6 (18.7%) had also experienced iT1a with a mean time to presentation of the late PT1a of 45 months. iT1a was associated with a significantly increased likelihood of developing a PT1a (P < .01) and decreased median survival (P < .01), but there was no known aneurysm-related mortality.
Development of PT1a following elective EVAR is associated with increased all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality and presents an average of 52 months postoperatively. This underscores the importance of long-term surveillance. Patients with PT1a who had a successful intervention showed no significant difference in median survival. Those with iT1a had a higher risk for PT1a compared with the EVAR cohort overall and had decreased median survival, without increased aneurysm-related mortality.
本研究评估了血管腔内修复术(EVAR)后1a型内漏(PT1a)的发生率及长期预后。
对2006年6月至2012年6月在单一机构连续进行的主髂动脉EVAR手术进行回顾性分析。通过术后影像学检查确定PT1a患者,并与未发生PT1a的患者进行比较。还对一部分在EVAR术中完成血管造影时存在持续性1a型内漏(iT1a)且在初始随访影像学检查中已消失的PT1a患者的远期预后进行了研究。
389例患者接受了EVAR手术,中位随访时间为87个月(四分位间距,64 - 111个月)。PT1a的发生率为8.2%(n = 32),中位随访时间为74个月(四分位间距,52 - 138个月)。与整个队列相比,发生PT1a的患者在统计学上更可能为女性(32%对17%;P = 0.03),全因死亡率更高(71%对40%;P < 0.01),动脉瘤相关死亡率更高(15.6%对1.7%;P < 0.01)。出现症状的中位时间为52个月。在32例PT1a患者中,5例(15.6%)出现主动脉破裂,其中3例接受了延长袖带置入术,1例进行了开放移植物取出术,1例拒绝干预。共有6例患者(18.7%)拒绝干预;其中5例死于非动脉瘤相关原因,1例仍然存活。在26例接受干预的PT1a患者中,21例(80.7%)的PT1a得到解决,5例(19.2%)复发。对于复发的PT1a患者,2例导致动脉瘤相关死亡,2例在使用血管内移植物进行内衬后内漏消失,1例患者拒绝干预但仍然存活。PT1a患者经干预后内漏消失的中位生存估计值(140.0个月)与其余EVAR队列(120.0个月;P = 0.80)相比无显著差异。在PT1a队列中,6例(18.7%)也经历过iT1a,晚期PT1a出现的平均时间为45个月。iT1a与发生PT1a的可能性显著增加(P < 0.01)和中位生存期缩短(P < 0.01)相关,但无已知的动脉瘤相关死亡。
择期EVAR术后发生PT1a与全因死亡率和动脉瘤相关死亡率增加有关,平均在术后52个月出现。这突出了长期监测的重要性。PT1a患者经成功干预后中位生存期无显著差异。与整个EVAR队列相比,有iT1a的患者发生PT1a的风险更高,中位生存期缩短,且动脉瘤相关死亡率未增加。