• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化肝脏手术:北美是否在取得进展?

Optimal hepatic surgery: Are we making progress in North America?

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The James Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Department of Surgery, The James Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

出版信息

Surgery. 2021 Dec;170(6):1741-1748. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.06.028. Epub 2021 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2021.06.028
PMID:34325906
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this analysis was to determine whether optimal outcomes have increased in recent years. Hepatic surgery is high risk, but regionalization and minimally invasive approaches have evolved. Best practices also have been defined with the goal of improving outcomes.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried. Analyses were performed separately for partial (≤2 segments), major (≥3 segments), and all hepatectomies. Optimal hepatic surgery was defined as the absence of mortality, serious morbidity, need for a postoperative invasive procedure or reoperation, prolonged length of stay (<75th percentile) or readmission. Tests of trend, χ, and multivariable analyses were performed.

RESULTS

From 2014 to 2018, 17,082 hepatectomies, including 11,862 partial hepatectomies and 5,220 major hepatectomies, were analyzed. Minimally invasive approaches increased from 25.6% in 2014 to 29.6% in 2018 (P < .01) and were performed more frequently for partial hepatectomies (34.2%) than major hepatectomies (14.4%) (P < .01). Operative time decreased from 220 minutes in 2014 to 208 minutes in 2018 (P < .05) and was lower in partial hepatectomies (189 vs 258 minutes for major hepatectomies) (P < .01). Mortality (0.7%) and length of stay (4 days) were lower for partial hepatectomies compared with major hepatectomies (1.9%; 6 days), and length of stay decreased for both partial hepatectomies (5 days in 2014 to 4 days in 2018) and major hepatectomies (6 days in 2014 to 6 days in 2018) (all P < .01). Postoperative sepsis (2.9% in 2014 and 2.4% in 2018), bile leaks (6% in 2014 and 4.8% in 2018), and liver failure (3.7% in 2014 and 3.3% in 2018) decreased for all patients (<.05). On multivariable analyses, overall morbidity decreased for major hepatectomies (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99) and all hepatectomies (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, both P < .01), and optimal hepatic surgery increased over time for partial hepatectomies (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.09) and all hepatectomies (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.07, both P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Over a 5-year period in North America, minimally invasive hepatectomies have increased, while operative time, postoperative sepsis, bile leaks, liver failure, and prolonged length of stay have decreased. Optimal hepatic surgery has increased for partial and all hepatectomies and is achieved more often in partial than in major resections.

摘要

背景

本分析旨在确定近年来是否提高了最佳结果。肝切除术风险较高,但区域化和微创方法已经发展。随着目标是改善结果,最佳实践也已经确定。

方法

查询美国外科医师学院国家手术质量改进计划数据库。分别对部分(≤2 段)、主要(≥3 段)和所有肝切除术进行分析。最佳肝切除术定义为无死亡、严重发病率、需要术后侵入性操作或再次手术、延长住院时间(<75 百分位数)或再入院。进行趋势检验、χ 和多变量分析。

结果

2014 年至 2018 年期间,分析了 17082 例肝切除术,包括 11862 例部分肝切除术和 5220 例主要肝切除术。微创方法的比例从 2014 年的 25.6%增加到 2018 年的 29.6%(P<0.01),并且更多地用于部分肝切除术(34.2%)而不是主要肝切除术(14.4%)(P<0.01)。手术时间从 2014 年的 220 分钟减少到 2018 年的 208 分钟(P<0.05),部分肝切除术的手术时间更低(189 分钟比主要肝切除术的 258 分钟)(P<0.01)。与主要肝切除术相比,部分肝切除术的死亡率(0.7%)和住院时间(4 天)较低(1.9%;6 天),并且部分肝切除术和主要肝切除术的住院时间均减少(2014 年为 5 天,2018 年为 4 天)(均 P<0.01)。术后脓毒症(2014 年为 2.9%,2018 年为 2.4%)、胆漏(2014 年为 6%,2018 年为 4.8%)和肝功能衰竭(2014 年为 3.7%,2018 年为 3.3%)在所有患者中均有所下降(均 P<0.05)。多变量分析显示,主要肝切除术(OR 0.95,95%CI 0.91-0.99)和所有肝切除术(OR 0.97,95%CI 0.94-0.99,均 P<0.01)的总体发病率降低,并且部分肝切除术(OR 1.05,95%CI 1.02-1.09)和所有肝切除术(OR 1.04,95%CI 1.02-1.07,均 P<0.01)的最佳肝切除术随着时间的推移而增加。

结论

在北美 5 年期间,微创肝切除术增加,而手术时间、术后脓毒症、胆漏、肝功能衰竭和延长住院时间减少。部分和所有肝切除术的最佳肝切除术都有所增加,而且在部分肝切除术中比主要切除术中更常见。

相似文献

1
Optimal hepatic surgery: Are we making progress in North America?优化肝脏手术:北美是否在取得进展?
Surgery. 2021 Dec;170(6):1741-1748. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.06.028. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
2
Minimally Invasive Hepatectomy in North America: Laparoscopic Versus Robotic.北美地区的微创肝切除术:腹腔镜与机器人。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Jan;25(1):85-93. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04703-6. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
3
Optimal Pancreatic Surgery: Are We Making Progress in North America?最优胰腺手术:北美胰腺手术是否取得进步?
Ann Surg. 2021 Oct 1;274(4):e355-e363. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003628.
4
Patterns of hepatic resections in North America: use of concurrent partial resections and ablations.北美肝切除术模式:同期部分切除术与消融术的应用
HPB (Oxford). 2016 Oct;18(10):813-820. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
5
Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive hepatectomy: a contemporary single-institution experience with 400 consecutive resections.微创肝切除术应用相关的变化趋势和结果:单中心 400 例连续切除术的当代经验
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4658-4665. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6310-1. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
6
Nationwide outcomes and costs of laparoscopic and robotic vs. open hepatectomy.腹腔镜和机器人肝切除术与开腹肝切除术的全国性结果和成本。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Aug;13(4):557-565. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0896-0. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
7
Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open hepatectomy.机器人辅助肝切除术与开放性肝切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Mar;89(3):165-170. doi: 10.1111/ans.14690. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
8
The minimally invasive approach confers improved outcomes in frail cancer patients undergoing hepatectomy: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.微创手术为接受肝切除术的虚弱癌症患者带来更好的结果:美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jul;28(7):1017-1026. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.03.032. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
9
Hepatobilio-pancreatic robotic surgery: initial experience from a single center institute.肝胆胰机器人手术:单中心机构的初步经验
J Robot Surg. 2017 Sep;11(3):355-365. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0663-z. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
10
Risk factors and outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive hepatectomy with unplanned conversion: a contemporary NSQIP analysis.计划外中转行微创肝切除术患者的风险因素和结局:一项当代 NSQIP 分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2023 May;25(5):577-588. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.01.018. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
ASO Author Reflections: AI Unraveling Clinical Versus Nonclinical Effects on Post-hepatectomy LOS.ASO作者反思:人工智能揭示肝切除术后住院时间的临床与非临床影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May;32(5):3553-3554. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17048-8. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
2
Developing a Novel Artificial Intelligence Framework to Measure the Balance of Clinical Versus Nonclinical Influences on Posthepatectomy Length of Stay.开发一种新型人工智能框架,以衡量临床因素与非临床因素对肝切除术后住院时间的影响平衡。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May;32(5):3526-3538. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-16942-5. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
10 years, 100 robotic major hepatectomies: a single-center experience.
10 年,100 例机器人辅助肝切除术:单中心经验。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):902-907. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10459-2. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
4
Complications and failure-to-rescue after pancreatectomy and hospital participation in the targeted American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry.胰腺切除术后的并发症和救援失败,以及医院参与美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划登记处的情况。
Surgery. 2023 Nov;174(5):1235-1240. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.07.023. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
5
Frailty Predicts Loss of Independence After Liver Surgery.衰弱预测肝手术后丧失独立性。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Dec;26(12):2496-2502. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05513-8. Epub 2022 Nov 7.