Pipan Paula, Hall Andrew, Rogiers Suzy Y, Holzapfel Bruno P
School of Agriculture and Wine Science, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
National Wine and Grape Industry Centre, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jul 13;12:635299. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.635299. eCollection 2021.
In response to global heating, accurate climate data are required to calculate climatic indices for long-term decisions about vineyard management, vineyard site selection, varieties planted and to predict phenological development. The availability of spatially interpolated climate data has the potential to make viticultural climate analyses possible at specific sites without the expense and uncertainty of collecting climate data within vineyards. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and precision of climatic indices calculated using an on-site climate sensor and an interpolated climate dataset to assess whether the effect of spatial variability in climate at this fine spatial scale significantly affects phonological modelling outcomes.
Four sites comprising two topographically homogenous vineyards and two topographically diverse vineyards in three wine regions in Victoria (Australia) were studied across four growing seasons. A freely available database of interpolated Australian climate data based on government climate station records (Scientific Information for Land Owners, SILO) provided temperature data for grid cells containing the sites (resolution 0.05° latitude by 0.05° longitude, approximately 5 km × 5 km). In-vineyard data loggers collected temperature data for the same time period. The results indicated that the only significant difference between the two climate data sources was the minimum temperatures in the topographically varied vineyards where night-time thermal layering is likely to occur.
The interpolated climate data closely matched the in-vineyard recorded maximum temperatures in all cases and minimum temperatures for the topographically homogeneous vineyards. However, minimum temperatures were not as accurately predicted by the interpolated data for the topographically complex sites. Therefore, this specific interpolated dataset was a reasonable substitute for in-vineyard collected data only for vineyard sites that are unlikely to experience night-time thermal layering.
Access to accurate climate data from a free interpolation service, such as SILO provides a valuable tool tomanage blocks or sections within vineyards more precisely for vineyards that do not have a weather station on site. Care, nevertheless, is required to account for minimum temperature discrepancies in topographically varied vineyards, due to the potential for cool air pooling at night, that may not be reflected in interpolated climate data.
为应对全球气候变暖,需要准确的气候数据来计算气候指数,以便就葡萄园管理、葡萄园选址、种植品种做出长期决策,并预测物候发育情况。空间插值气候数据的可用性有可能使在特定地点进行葡萄栽培气候分析成为可能,而无需在葡萄园内收集气候数据的成本和不确定性。本研究的目的是比较使用现场气候传感器和插值气候数据集计算的气候指数的准确性和精确性,以评估在这种精细空间尺度下气候空间变异性的影响是否会显著影响物候建模结果。
在澳大利亚维多利亚州的三个葡萄酒产区,对四个地点进行了研究,包括两个地形均匀的葡萄园和两个地形多样的葡萄园,研究跨越了四个生长季节。一个基于政府气候站记录的澳大利亚插值气候数据免费数据库(土地所有者科学信息,SILO)提供了包含这些地点的网格单元的温度数据(分辨率为0.05°纬度乘0.05°经度,约5公里×5公里)。葡萄园数据记录器在同一时间段收集温度数据。结果表明,两个气候数据源之间唯一显著的差异是地形多样的葡萄园中可能出现夜间热分层的最低温度。
插值气候数据在所有情况下都与葡萄园记录的最高温度以及地形均匀的葡萄园的最低温度密切匹配。然而,对于地形复杂的地点,插值数据对最低温度的预测并不那么准确。因此,这个特定的插值数据集仅对于不太可能经历夜间热分层的葡萄园地点才是葡萄园收集数据的合理替代品。
通过免费插值服务(如SILO)获取准确的气候数据,为没有现场气象站的葡萄园更精确地管理葡萄园地块或区域提供了一个有价值的工具。然而,由于夜间冷空气积聚的可能性,地形多样的葡萄园中最低温度的差异需要考虑,这可能不会在插值气候数据中得到反映。