Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center (A.R., C.M., P.K.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Hamburg/Luebeck/Kiel (A.R., C.M., K.-H.K., K.W., P.K.).
Circulation. 2021 Sep 14;144(11):845-858. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056323. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
Even on optimal therapy, many patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation experience cardiovascular complications. Additional treatments are needed to reduce these events, especially in patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
This prespecified subanalysis of the randomized EAST-AFNET4 trial (Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention Trial) assessed the effect of systematic, early rhythm control therapy (ERC; using antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation) compared with usual care (allowing rhythm control therapy to improve symptoms) on the 2 primary outcomes of the trial and on selected secondary outcomes in patients with heart failure, defined as heart failure symptoms New York Heart Association II to III or left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <50%.
This analysis included 798 patients (300 [37.6%] female, median age 71.0 [64.0, 76.0] years, 785 with known LVEF). The majority of patients (n=442) had heart failure and preserved LVEF (LVEF≥50%; mean LVEF 61±6.3%), the others had heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (n=211; LVEF 40%-49%; mean LVEF 44 ± 2.9%) or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n=132; LVEF<40%; mean LVEF 31±5.5%). Over the 5.1-year median follow-up, the composite primary outcome of cardiovascular death, stroke, or hospitalization for worsening of heart failure or for acute coronary syndrome occurred less often in patients randomly assigned to ERC (94/396; 5.7 per 100 patient-years) compared with patients randomly assigned to usual care (130/402; 7.9 per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio, 0.74 [0.56-0.97]; =0.03), not altered by heart failure status (interaction value=0.63). The primary safety outcome (death, stroke, or serious adverse events related to rhythm control therapy) occurred in 71 of 396 (17.9%) patients with heart failure randomly assigned to ERC and in 87 of 402 (21.6%) patients with heart failure randomly assigned to usual care (hazard ratio, 0.85 [0.62-1.17]; =0.33). LVEF improved in both groups (LVEF change at 2 years: ERC 5.3±11.6%, usual care 4.9±11.6%, =0.43). ERC also improved the composite outcome of death or hospitalization for worsening of heart failure.
Rhythm control therapy conveys clinical benefit when initiated within 1 year of diagnosing atrial fibrillation in patients with signs or symptoms of heart failure. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01288352. URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com; Unique identifier: ISRCTN04708680. URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu; Unique identifier: 2010-021258-20.
即使在最佳治疗下,许多心力衰竭伴心房颤动的患者仍会经历心血管并发症。需要额外的治疗来减少这些事件,尤其是在心力衰竭伴保留左心室射血分数的患者中。
这项随机 EAST-AFNET4 试验(预防卒中的早期房颤治疗试验)的预先指定亚组分析评估了系统的早期节律控制治疗(ERC;使用抗心律失常药物或导管消融)与常规治疗(允许节律控制治疗改善症状)对试验的 2 个主要结局以及心力衰竭患者的选定次要结局的影响,心力衰竭定义为心力衰竭症状纽约心脏协会 II 至 III 级或左心室射血分数[LVEF]<50%。
本分析纳入了 798 名患者(300 名[37.6%]女性,中位年龄 71.0[64.0,76.0]岁,785 名已知 LVEF)。大多数患者(n=442)患有心力衰竭伴保留的 LVEF(LVEF≥50%;平均 LVEF 61±6.3%),其余患者患有中间射血分数的心力衰竭(n=211;LVEF 40%-49%;平均 LVEF 44±2.9%)或射血分数降低的心力衰竭(n=132;LVEF<40%;平均 LVEF 31±5.5%)。在中位随访 5.1 年期间,与接受常规治疗的患者(随机分配至 ERC 的患者 94/396;每 100 患者年 5.7 例;随机分配至常规治疗的患者 130/402;每 100 患者年 7.9 例;危险比,0.74[0.56-0.97];=0.03)相比,随机分配至 ERC 的患者心血管死亡、卒中和因心力衰竭恶化或急性冠状动脉综合征而住院的复合主要结局较少,心力衰竭状态未改变(交互 值=0.63)。主要安全性结局(死亡、卒中和与节律控制治疗相关的严重不良事件)发生在随机分配至 ERC 的心力衰竭患者中 71 例(17.9%)和随机分配至常规治疗的心力衰竭患者中 87 例(21.6%)(危险比,0.85[0.62-1.17];=0.33)。两组的 LVEF 均有所改善(2 年时 LVEF 变化:ERC 5.3±11.6%,常规治疗 4.9±11.6%;=0.43)。ERC 还改善了死亡或因心力衰竭恶化而住院的复合结局。
在诊断心房颤动后 1 年内开始节律控制治疗时,可使心力衰竭有症状或体征的患者获得临床获益。