Department of Ecology, Institute of Biosciences, University of São Paulo, Rua do Matão, 321, travessa 14, 05508-090 São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 20;796:149028. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149028. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
The provision of ecosystem services is inherently spatial. Landscape structure affects service provision through multiple landscape-level processes, such as fragmentation, edge and connectivity effects. These processes can affect areas of ecosystem service supply and demand, and the flows linking those areas. Despite the emergence of sophisticated spatial ecosystem service assessments in the last two decades, we show through a literature review that landscape-level processes are still rarely considered in a comprehensive way. Even when they are considered, landscape effects are mostly limited to landscape composition, and configuration effects are underrepresented. Furthermore, most studies infer ecosystem service provision by only evaluating supply, ignoring demand and flows. Here we present a simple conceptual framework that illustrates how to incorporate landscape-level processes in the assessment of the different components of the service provision chain (supply, demand and flows). Using simulations, we evaluated how estimations of ecosystem service provision change when considering different landscape processes and discussed the implications of disregarding landscape effects. However, to fully implement the framework, a series of challenges linked to mapping and quantifying supply and demand, defining adequate scales of analysis, measuring flows, and parameterizing models for different types of services, still need to be overcome. To promote an adequate use and management of ecosystem services, it is essential to better incorporate landscape processes in ecosystem service assessments. This will lead to more quantitatively accurate and spatially precise estimates.
生态系统服务的提供本质上具有空间性。景观结构通过多种景观水平过程(如破碎化、边缘和连通性效应)影响服务提供。这些过程会影响生态系统服务供给和需求的区域,以及连接这些区域的流。尽管在过去二十年中出现了复杂的空间生态系统服务评估,但我们通过文献回顾表明,景观水平过程仍然很少被全面考虑。即使它们被考虑在内,景观效应大多仅限于景观组成,而配置效应则被低估。此外,大多数研究通过仅评估供给来推断生态系统服务的提供,而忽略了需求和流。在这里,我们提出了一个简单的概念框架,说明了如何在服务提供链(供给、需求和流)的不同组成部分的评估中纳入景观水平过程。我们使用模拟来评估在考虑不同景观过程时,对生态系统服务提供的估计会如何变化,并讨论了忽视景观效应的影响。然而,要全面实施该框架,还需要克服与供给和需求的映射和量化、定义适当的分析尺度、测量流以及为不同类型的服务进行模型参数化相关的一系列挑战。为了促进生态系统服务的适当利用和管理,必须在生态系统服务评估中更好地纳入景观过程。这将导致更具定量准确性和空间精确性的估计。