Suppr超能文献

农药混合物的风险——风险评估与现实之间的差距。

Risk from pesticide mixtures - The gap between risk assessment and reality.

机构信息

Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) Leipzig, 04318 Leipzig, Germany; Institute for Environmental Sciences, University Koblenz-Landau, 76829 Landau in der Pfalz, Germany.

German Federal Environment Agency (UBA), 06844 Dessau-Roßlau, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 20;796:149017. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149017. Epub 2021 Jul 13.

Abstract

Pesticide applications in agricultural crops often comprise a mixture of plant protection products (PPP), and single fields face multiple applications per year leading to complex pesticide mixtures in the environment. Restricted to single PPP, the current European Union PPP regulation, however, disregards the ecological risks of pesticide mixtures. To quantify this additional risk, we evaluated the contribution of single pesticide active ingredients to the additive mixture risk for aquatic risk indicators (invertebrates and algae) in 464 different PPP used, 3446 applications sprayed and 830 water samples collected in Central Europe, Germany. We identified an average number of 1.3 different pesticides in a single PPP, 3.1 for complete applications often involving multiple PPP and 30 in stream water samples. Under realistic worst-case conditions, the estimated stream water pesticide risk based on additive effects was 3.2 times higher than predicted from single PPP. We found that in streams, however, the majority of regulatory threshold exceedances was caused by single pesticides alone (69% for algae, 81% for invertebrates). Both in PPP applications and in stream samples, pesticide exposure occurred in repeated pulses each driven by one to few alternating pesticides. The time intervals between pulses were shorter than the 8 weeks considered for ecological recovery in environmental risk assessment in 88% of spray series and 53% of streams. We conclude that pesticide risk assessment should consider an additional assessment factor to account for the additive, but also potential synergistic simultaneous pesticide mixture risk. Additionally, future research and risk assessment need to address the risk from the frequent sequential pesticide exposure observed in this study.

摘要

农业作物中的农药应用通常包含多种植保产品(PPP),且单一农田每年面临多次施药,导致环境中存在复杂的农药混合物。然而,受限于单一 PPP,当前欧盟的 PPP 法规忽略了农药混合物的生态风险。为了量化这种额外风险,我们评估了单一农药活性成分对水生风险指标(无脊椎动物和藻类)在中欧 464 种不同 PPP、3446 次施药和 830 个采集水样中的加性混合物风险的贡献。我们在单个 PPP 中识别出平均 1.3 种不同的农药,在完整的应用中(通常涉及多种 PPP)为 3.1 种,在溪流水样中为 30 种。在现实的最坏情况下,基于加性效应估计的溪流农药风险比从单一 PPP 预测的风险高 3.2 倍。然而,我们发现,在溪流中,大多数监管阈值超标是由单一农药单独引起的(藻类为 69%,无脊椎动物为 81%)。无论是在 PPP 应用还是在溪流样本中,农药暴露都是由一个到几个交替农药驱动的重复脉冲发生的。脉冲之间的时间间隔比环境风险评估中考虑的 8 周生态恢复时间更短,在 88%的喷雾系列和 53%的溪流中都是如此。我们得出结论,农药风险评估应考虑额外的评估因素,以应对加性的、但也可能是协同的同时农药混合物风险。此外,未来的研究和风险评估需要解决本研究中观察到的频繁顺序农药暴露的风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验