Suppr超能文献

比较两项全国性调查:国家家庭成长调查和青少年风险行为调查中青少年性行为和避孕行为的估计值和趋势。

Comparability of estimates and trends in adolescent sexual and contraceptive behaviors from two national surveys: National Survey of Family Growth and the Youth Risk Behavior Survey.

机构信息

Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York, United States of America.

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jul 30;16(7):e0253262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253262. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare adolescents' reports of sexual and contraceptive behaviors between the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) and the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS).

METHODS

For each survey, we estimated the year- and sex-specific prevalence of sexual and contraceptive behaviors among a comparably defined sample of US respondents ages 15-19 currently attending high school. We used logistic regression to test for changes in prevalence from 2007-2019 and conducted sensitivity analyses to investigate between-survey differences.

RESULTS

We found differences in both prevalence and trends between the YRBS and NSFG when limited to a comparably defined sample. Compared to the NSFG, adolescents in the YRBS were more likely to report being sexually experienced, less likely to report use of prescription methods for both sexes, and less likely to report condoms among males. Only the YRBS estimated significant declines in sexual experience for both sexes, and significant increases in prescription methods and declines in condom use among males. Differences between surveys in the prevalence of specific contraceptive methods reflected greater combined use of methods in the NSFG. We identified differences in question-wording and other aspects that may influence these differential patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

The NSFG and YRBS produced inconsistent prevalence estimates and trends for sexual and contraceptive behaviors among in-school adolescents. Further efforts to improve these national surveillance systems are critical to inform policy and research efforts that support adolescent sexual and reproductive health and wellbeing.

摘要

目的

比较《国家家庭增长调查》(NSFG)和《青年风险行为调查》(YRBS)中青少年性和避孕行为的报告。

方法

对于每个调查,我们估计了当前就读高中的年龄在 15-19 岁的具有可比性的美国受访者中,按年份和性别划分的性行为和避孕行为的流行率。我们使用逻辑回归检验 2007-2019 年的流行率变化,并进行敏感性分析以调查调查之间的差异。

结果

当仅限于具有可比性的样本时,我们在 YRBS 和 NSFG 之间发现了流行率和趋势的差异。与 NSFG 相比,YRBS 中的青少年更有可能报告有过性经验,对于男女来说,更不可能报告使用处方方法,并且男性更不可能报告使用避孕套。只有 YRBS 估计出两性的性经验显著下降,以及处方方法显著增加和男性避孕套使用下降。调查之间在特定避孕方法的流行率上的差异反映了 NSFG 中方法的综合使用更多。我们发现了在问题措辞和其他方面的差异,这些差异可能影响这些差异模式。

结论

NSFG 和 YRBS 对在校青少年的性行为和避孕行为产生了不一致的流行率估计和趋势。进一步努力改进这些国家监测系统对于为支持青少年性和生殖健康和福祉的政策和研究工作提供信息至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a46/8323913/09d3db9a234a/pone.0253262.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验