Division of Pediatric Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Division of Pediatric Medical Psychology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Burn Care Res. 2021 Nov 24;42(6):1097-1102. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab152.
The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to increased isolation and potentially decreased access to healthcare. We therefore evaluated the effect of COVID-19 on rates of compliance with recommended post-injury follow-up. We hypothesized that this isolation may lead to detrimental effects on adherence to proper follow-up for children with burn injuries. We queried the registry at an ABA-verified Level 1 pediatric burn center for patients aged 0-18 years who were treated and released from March 30 to July 31, 2020. As a control, we included patients treated during the same time frame from 2016 to 2019. Patient and clinical factors were compared between the COVID and pre-COVID cohorts. Predictors of follow-up were compared using chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate for predictors of compliance with follow-up. A total of 401 patients were seen and discharged from the pediatric ED for burns. Fifty-eight (14.5%) of these patients were seen during the pandemic. Burn characteristics and demographic patterns did not differ between the COVID and pre-COVID cohorts. Likewise, demographics did not differ between patients with follow-up and those without. The rate of compliance with 2-week follow-up was also not affected. Burn size, burn depth, and mechanism of injury all were associated with higher compliance to follow up. After adjusting for these variables, there was still no difference in the odds of appropriate follow-up. Despite concerns about decreased access to healthcare during COVID, follow-up rates for pediatric burn patients remained unchanged at our pediatric burn center.
新冠疫情的影响导致人们更加孤立,可能减少了获得医疗保健的机会。因此,我们评估了新冠疫情对遵循推荐的伤后随访率的影响。我们假设这种隔离可能对烧伤儿童遵医嘱进行适当随访产生不利影响。我们查询了一家经过 ABA 认证的一级儿科烧伤中心的注册信息,纳入了 2020 年 3 月 30 日至 7 月 31 日期间 0-18 岁接受治疗并出院的患者。作为对照,我们纳入了 2016 年至 2019 年同期治疗的患者。比较了两组患者的人口统计学和临床特征。使用卡方检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较了随访预测因素。使用多变量逻辑回归评估了随访依从性的预测因素。共有 401 名儿童因烧伤到儿科急诊就诊并出院。其中 58 名(14.5%)是在疫情期间就诊的。新冠疫情和疫情前两组患者的烧伤特征和人口统计学模式没有差异。同样,有随访和无随访患者的人口统计学特征也没有差异。两周随访的依从率也没有受到影响。烧伤面积、烧伤深度和损伤机制都与更高的随访依从性相关。在调整了这些变量后,适当随访的可能性仍然没有差异。尽管人们担心在新冠疫情期间医疗保健机会减少,但我们的儿科烧伤中心儿科烧伤患者的随访率保持不变。