Justice J
Institute for Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143.
Soc Sci Med. 1987;25(12):1301-6. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(87)90128-6.
Using primary care as an example, this paper examines how the bureaucratic structures and culture of the international health agencies have affected the planning and delivery of health programs. Many primary health care programs were ineffective, as research undertaken in Nepal has shown, because they reflected the perspective and needs of the health bureaucracies involved rather than those of the local villages receiving services. Similarly, work in other South and Southeast Asian countries reveals that primary health care was interpreted differently in different bureaucratic settings and adapted to bureaucratic needs, but not necessarily adapted to village cultures and conditions. Social scientists, who are trained to analyze and articulate different cultural contexts, can play a key role in helping international health bureaucracies become more sensitive to the rural village cultures they serve.
以初级保健为例,本文探讨了国际卫生机构的官僚结构和文化如何影响卫生项目的规划和实施。正如在尼泊尔进行的研究所表明的那样,许多初级卫生保健项目效果不佳,因为它们反映的是相关卫生官僚机构的观点和需求,而非接受服务的当地村庄的观点和需求。同样,在其他南亚和东南亚国家开展的工作表明,初级卫生保健在不同的官僚环境中有不同的解读,并根据官僚需求进行了调整,但不一定适应村庄文化和条件。受过分析和阐明不同文化背景训练的社会科学家,在帮助国际卫生官僚机构对其服务的乡村文化更加敏感方面可以发挥关键作用。