• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于鼻咽拭子的自动化 SARS-CoV-2 Ag 检测用于 COVID-19 感染诊断的性能评估。

Performance evaluation of an automated SARS-CoV-2 Ag test for the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection on nasopharyngeal swabs.

机构信息

Université de Lorraine, CNRS, LCPME, Nancy, France.

Laboratoire de Virologie, CHRU de Nancy Brabois, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Jul 30;59(12):2003-2009. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0569. Print 2021 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1515/cclm-2021-0569
PMID:34331847
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The detection of SARS-CoV-2 in infected people is a key tool to help in controlling COVID-19 pandemic. Like rapid antigenic tests, automated antigen tests, that present the advantage of a higher throughput flow, may be of interest. The LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 Ag test was evaluated for the quantification of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen in nasopharyngeal swabs by comparison to RT-PCR.

METHODS

The study involved 378 nasopharyngeal samples (UTM and FLOQSwab™, Copan Diagnostics), including 46 swabs positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. These samples came from asymptomatic (n=99, 26.2%) or symptomatic people (n=279, 73.8%), at different times from symptom onset. The samples were analyzed on LIAISON XL.

RESULTS

The overall specificity was 99.4% (CI95% [98.6-100]). The negative predictive value reached 100% in asymptomatic people. Among the 46 positive samples, the overall sensitivity was 84.8% (CI95% [74.4-95.2]), reached 91.9% (CI95% [83.1-100]) in the first fourth days after symptoms onset and was 100% for Cq values ≤25. Antigen was not detected in samples with Cq values >25. Similar results were observed on nasopharyngeal swabs coming from patients infected with the 20I/501Y.V1 variant or the 20H/501Y.V2 variant.

CONCLUSIONS

According to technical performances, the LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 Ag test may be a useful tool for COVID-19 diagnosis, especially during the first four days of symptoms.

摘要

目的

检测感染人群中的 SARS-CoV-2 是帮助控制 COVID-19 大流行的关键工具。与快速抗原检测相比,具有更高通量的自动化抗原检测可能更具优势。本研究通过与 RT-PCR 比较,评估了 LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 Ag 检测试剂盒用于检测鼻咽拭子中 SARS-CoV-2 核衣壳抗原的定量检测。

方法

该研究共纳入 378 例鼻咽样本(UTM 和 FLOQSwab™,Copan Diagnostics),其中 46 例样本经 RT-PCR 检测为 SARS-CoV-2 阳性。这些样本来自无症状(n=99,26.2%)或有症状(n=279,73.8%)人群,在出现症状的不同时间采集。样本在 LIAISON XL 上进行分析。

结果

总体特异性为 99.4%(95%CI [98.6-100])。在无症状人群中,阴性预测值达到 100%。在 46 例阳性样本中,总体敏感性为 84.8%(95%CI [74.4-95.2]),在症状出现后第 1-4 天达到 91.9%(95%CI [83.1-100]),对于 Cq 值≤25 的样本敏感性为 100%。对于 Cq 值>25 的样本,未检测到抗原。在感染 20I/501Y.V1 变异株或 20H/501Y.V2 变异株的患者的鼻咽拭子中也观察到了类似的结果。

结论

根据技术性能,LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 Ag 检测试剂盒可能是 COVID-19 诊断的有用工具,尤其是在症状出现的前四天。

相似文献

1
Performance evaluation of an automated SARS-CoV-2 Ag test for the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection on nasopharyngeal swabs.基于鼻咽拭子的自动化 SARS-CoV-2 Ag 检测用于 COVID-19 感染诊断的性能评估。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Jul 30;59(12):2003-2009. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0569. Print 2021 Nov 25.
2
Analytical performances of the point-of-care SIENNA™ COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein in nasopharyngeal swabs: A prospective evaluation during the COVID-19 second wave in France.即时检验 SIENNA™ COVID-19 抗原快速检测用于检测鼻咽拭子中 SARS-CoV-2 核衣壳蛋白的分析性能:法国 COVID-19 第二波期间的前瞻性评估。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 May;106:8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.051. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
3
Panbio antigen rapid test is reliable to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first 7 days after the onset of symptoms.Panbio 抗原快速检测在症状出现后 7 天内对诊断 SARS-CoV-2 感染是可靠的。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Dec;133:104659. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104659. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
4
Comparison between Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection in an Asymptomatic Population, and Direct Confirmation by RT-PCR from the Residual Buffer.鼻拭子和咽拭子在无症状人群中用于 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的比较,以及从剩余缓冲液中用 RT-PCR 直接确认。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0245521. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02455-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
5
[Repetition of microbiological tests in suspect of SARS-CoV-2 infection: utility of a score based on clinical probability].[对疑似SARS-CoV-2感染进行微生物学检测的重复:基于临床概率的评分的效用]
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2020 Dec;33(6):410-414. doi: 10.37201/req/080.2020. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
6
Performance of a rapid antigen test in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.快速抗原检测在 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断中的性能。
J Med Virol. 2021 May;93(5):2988-2991. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26830. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
7
On-field evaluation of a ultra-rapid fluorescence immunoassay as a frontline test for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic.现场评估一种超快速荧光免疫分析作为 SARS-CoV-2 诊断的一线检测方法。
J Virol Methods. 2021 Sep;295:114201. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114201. Epub 2021 May 28.
8
Current status of the lateral flow immunoassay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swabs.鼻咽拭子中用于检测 SARS-CoV-2 的侧向流动免疫分析的现状。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021 Jun 15;31(2):020601. doi: 10.11613/BM.2021.020601.
9
Comparison of four commercial, automated antigen tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.比较四种商业化的自动化抗原检测试剂对检测 SARS-CoV-2 关注变异株的效果。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2021 Dec;210(5-6):263-275. doi: 10.1007/s00430-021-00719-0. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
10
Handling and accuracy of four rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 compared to RT-qPCR.四种快速抗原检测试剂用于 SARS-CoV-2 诊断的性能比较及与 RT-qPCR 的准确性对比。
J Clin Virol. 2021 Apr;137:104782. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104782. Epub 2021 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
External Quality Assessment Program for SARS-COV-2 Molecular Detection in Pakistan.巴基斯坦 SARS-COV-2 分子检测的外部质量评估计划。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2024 Jul;18(7):e13316. doi: 10.1111/irv.13316.
2
Clinical accuracy of instrument-based SARS-CoV-2 antigen diagnostic tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于仪器的 SARS-CoV-2 抗原诊断检测的临床准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Virol J. 2024 Apr 29;21(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02371-5.
3
Automated antigen assays display a high heterogeneity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, including several Omicron sublineages.
自动化抗原检测在检测 SARS-CoV-2 关注变体方面表现出高度的异质性,包括几种奥密克戎亚谱系。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2023 Oct;212(5):307-322. doi: 10.1007/s00430-023-00774-9. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
4
Systematic Review of Diagnostic Accuracy of DiaSorin Liaison SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Immunoassay.索林Liaison SARS-CoV-2抗原免疫测定诊断准确性的系统评价
EJIFCC. 2022 Aug 8;33(2):94-104. eCollection 2022 Aug.
5
Evaluation of the DiaSorin LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay on nasopharyngeal swabs in two different SARS-CoV-2 pandemic waves in Switzerland: The impact of the Omicron variant on its performance.瑞士两次不同的新冠疫情浪潮中,对DiaSorin LIAISON SARS-CoV-2抗原检测法在鼻咽拭子检测中的评估:奥密克戎变异株对其性能的影响。
J Clin Virol Plus. 2022 Aug;2(3):100095. doi: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100095. Epub 2022 Jun 26.
6
First Results of an External Quality Assessment (EQA) Scheme for Molecular, Serological and Antigenic Diagnostic Test for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Lombardy Region (Northern Italy), 2020-2022.2020 - 2022年意大利北部伦巴第地区针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)检测的分子、血清学和抗原诊断测试外部质量评估(EQA)计划的初步结果
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 16;12(6):1483. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061483.
7
Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests for COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.用于新冠病毒诊断的快速抗原检测性能:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 4;12(1):110. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12010110.
8
Comparison of Rapid and Automated Antigen Detection Tests for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.用于诊断SARS-CoV-2感染的快速和自动化抗原检测试验的比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 4;12(1):104. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12010104.
9
Capacitive biosensor based on vertically paired electrodes for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.基于垂直配对电极的电容式生物传感器,用于检测 SARS-CoV-2。
Biosens Bioelectron. 2022 Apr 15;202:113975. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2022.113975. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
10
Diagnostic Performance of Automated SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Assay in Nasal Swab during COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign.新冠疫苗接种活动期间鼻拭子中新冠病毒2型自动抗原检测的诊断性能
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Nov 15;11(11):2110. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11112110.