• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 MOST 研究中,负重 CT 和 X 线片对 MRI 显示的髌股软骨的临床价值。

Clinical value of weight-bearing CT and radiographs for detecting patellofemoral cartilage visualized by MRI in the MOST study.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Mailstop 1046, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.

出版信息

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2021 Nov;29(11):1540-1548. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2021.07.011
PMID:34332048
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8542599/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The patellofemoral joint is frequently affected by osteoarthritis (PFOA) and is incompletely imaged on radiographs (XR). Weight-Bearing CT (WBCT) could offer advantages for visualization. This study determined the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of axial WBCT and lateral XR for detection of PFOA features in comparison with cartilage damage on MRI.

DESIGN

A convenience sample of 60 right knees from the MOST cohort were analyzed. WBCT and XR were read for OARSI JSN score and MRI for MOAKS cartilage score by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists blinded to participant. Using MOAKS scoring on MRI (referent standard), the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of patellofemoral OARSI JSN scores based on WBCT and XR were compared.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD age and BMI for the participants included (66.7% women) were 67.6 ± 9.8 years and 30.0 ± 5.3 kg/m respectively. WBCT demonstrated significantly greater sensitivity (0.85-0.97 on WBCT vs 0.47-0.57 on XR) and accuracy (0.85-0.92 on WBCT vs 0.48-0.57 on XR) for all parameters except lateral full-thickness cartilage loss (McNemar's test p-values all <0.001). There was moderate-to-strong and low-to-moderate agreement between PFOA findings on WBCT and XR, respectively, and semi-quantitative scores of PF cartilage on MRI. Inter-rater reliability for XR JSN [weighted kappa = 0.83 (0.64, 1.0)], WBCT JSN [kappa = 0.60 (0.48, 0.72)] and MRI MOAKS-CM [kappa = 0.70 (0.61, 0.79)] readings were good.

CONCLUSION

WBCT demonstrates significantly greater sensitivity and accuracy than radiographs for identification of PFOA. Given the same Relative Radiation Level as XR and improved visualization, WBCT holds promise to improve understanding of the weight-bearing patellofemoral joint.

摘要

目的

髌股关节常受骨关节炎(PFOA)影响,且在 X 光片(XR)上成像不完全。负重 CT(WBCT)在可视化方面可能具有优势。本研究比较了 MRI 上软骨损伤的情况下,评估轴向 WBCT 和外侧 XR 对 PFOA 特征检测的敏感性、特异性和准确性。

设计

对 MOST 队列的 60 个右膝进行了方便样本分析。由两名经验丰富的肌肉骨骼放射科医生对 WBCT 和 XR 进行 OARSI JSN 评分和 MRI 进行 MOAKS 软骨评分阅读,两位放射科医生均对参与者不知情。使用 MRI 上的 MOAKS 评分(参考标准),比较基于 WBCT 和 XR 的髌股 OARSI JSN 评分的敏感性、特异性和准确性。

结果

参与者的平均年龄和 BMI(66.7%为女性)分别为 67.6 ± 9.8 岁和 30.0 ± 5.3kg/m²。WBCT 显示出更高的敏感性(0.85-0.97 与 0.47-0.57)和准确性(0.85-0.92 与 0.48-0.57),除了外侧全层软骨缺失外(McNemar 检验的 p 值均<0.001)。WBCT 和 XR 之间以及 WBCT 和 MRI 之间的 PF 软骨半定量评分之间存在中度到高度和低度到中度的一致性。对于 XR JSN [加权 kappa=0.83(0.64,1.0)]、WBCT JSN [kappa=0.60(0.48,0.72)]和 MRI MOAKS-CM [kappa=0.70(0.61,0.79)]的阅读,观察者间可靠性良好。

结论

与 XR 相比,WBCT 对 PFOA 的识别具有更高的敏感性和准确性。考虑到与 XR 相同的相对辐射水平和改善的可视化效果,WBCT 有望提高对负重髌股关节的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcf/8542599/c8c9ff1d2bf3/nihms-1734416-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcf/8542599/dfdeabadbba5/nihms-1734416-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcf/8542599/c8c9ff1d2bf3/nihms-1734416-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcf/8542599/dfdeabadbba5/nihms-1734416-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcf/8542599/c8c9ff1d2bf3/nihms-1734416-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical value of weight-bearing CT and radiographs for detecting patellofemoral cartilage visualized by MRI in the MOST study.在 MOST 研究中,负重 CT 和 X 线片对 MRI 显示的髌股软骨的临床价值。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2021 Nov;29(11):1540-1548. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
2
Evaluating joint-space narrowing and cartilage loss in rheumatoid arthritis by using MRI.通过 MRI 评估类风湿关节炎的关节间隙变窄和软骨损失。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2012 May 30;14(3):R131. doi: 10.1186/ar3861.
3
Assessment of Flatfoot Deformity Using Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs: Reliability and Comparison to Conventional Radiographs.基于数字重建放射影像评估扁平足畸形:可靠性及与常规放射影像的比较。
Foot Ankle Int. 2022 Jul;43(7):983-993. doi: 10.1177/10711007221089260. Epub 2022 May 19.
4
Association of patella alta with worsening of patellofemoral osteoarthritis-related structural damage: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.髌股关节高位与髌股关节炎相关结构损伤恶化的关系:来自骨关节炎倡议的数据。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Feb;27(2):278-285. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
5
Minimum joint space width (mJSW) of patellofemoral joint on standing "skyline" radiographs: test-retest reproducibility and comparison with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI).站立位“天空线”X 线片上髌股关节最小关节间隙宽度(mJSW):测试-再测试可重复性及与定量磁共振成像(qMRI)的比较。
Skeletal Radiol. 2013 Nov;42(11):1573-82. doi: 10.1007/s00256-013-1701-9. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
6
Can we have an overall osteoarthritis severity score for the patellofemoral joint using magnetic resonance imaging? Reliability and validity.能否使用磁共振成像对髌股关节进行整体骨关节炎严重程度评分?可靠性和有效性。
Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Apr;37(4):1091-1098. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3888-y. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
7
Kneeling as a risk factor of patellofemoral joint cartilage damage worsening: an exploratory analysis on the Osteoarthritis Initiative.跪地姿势是髌股关节软骨损伤恶化的危险因素:对 Osteoarthritis Initiative 的探索性分析。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Apr;31(4):2601-2609. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07337-z. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
8
Patellofemoral morphology and alignment: reference values and dose-response patterns for the relation to MRI features of patellofemoral osteoarthritis.髌股形态和对线:髌股骨关节炎 MRI 特征相关的参考值和剂量反应模式。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Oct;25(10):1690-1697. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
9
Comparison between patella cartilage volume and radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint.髌骨软骨体积与髌股关节影像学评估之间的比较。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2003 May-Jun;21(3):321-6.
10
Upright CT of the knee: the effect of weight-bearing on joint alignment.膝关节直立位CT:负重对关节对线的影响。
Eur Radiol. 2015 Nov;25(11):3398-404. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3756-6. Epub 2015 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Your Patella Dislocated: Will It Happen Again? Key Magnetic Resonance Imaging Differences Between Patients With Multiple Patellar Dislocations and Patients With a One-Time Patellar Dislocation.你的髌骨脱位了:还会再次发生吗?多次髌骨脱位患者与一次性髌骨脱位患者之间关键的磁共振成像差异
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jul 28;13(7):23259671251356632. doi: 10.1177/23259671251356632. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Diagnostic value of MRI for detection of knee cartilage lesions vs. weight-bearing CT arthrography (WBCTa).与负重CT关节造影(WBCTa)相比,MRI对膝关节软骨损伤的诊断价值。
Skeletal Radiol. 2025 Jul 5. doi: 10.1007/s00256-025-04956-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Sample size calculations for diagnostic studies.诊断性研究的样本量计算。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Jul;25(7):777-778. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
2
Imaging of osteoarthritis-recent research developments and future perspective.骨关节炎的影像学——近期研究进展与未来展望
Br J Radiol. 2018 May;91(1085):20170349. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170349. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
3
Comparison of a Novel Weightbearing Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanner Versus a Conventional Computed Tomography Scanner for Measuring Patellar Instability.
Trends in the Use of Weightbearing Computed Tomography.
负重计算机断层扫描的使用趋势
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 18;13(18):5519. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185519.
4
Latest advancements in imaging techniques in OA.骨关节炎成像技术的最新进展。
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2022 Dec 26;14:1759720X221146621. doi: 10.1177/1759720X221146621. eCollection 2022.
5
Improved responsiveness to change in joint space width over 24-month follow-up: comparison of 3D JSW on weight-bearing CT vs 2D JSW on radiographs in the MOST study.24 个月随访时关节间隙宽度变化的反应性改善:负重 CT 的 3D JSW 与 MOST 研究中 X 线的 2D JSW 的比较。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2023 Mar;31(3):406-413. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.12.002. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
新型负重锥形束计算机断层扫描扫描仪与传统计算机断层扫描扫描仪在测量髌骨不稳定方面的比较。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Dec 7;4(12):2325967116673560. doi: 10.1177/2325967116673560. eCollection 2016 Dec.
4
Incidence, prevalence, natural course and prognosis of patellofemoral osteoarthritis: the Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee study.髌股关节炎的发病率、患病率、自然病程及预后:队列髋关节和队列膝关节研究
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 May;25(5):647-653. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
5
Test-retest reliability of tibiofemoral joint space width measurements made using a low-dose standing CT scanner.使用低剂量站立式CT扫描仪测量胫股关节间隙宽度的重测信度。
Skeletal Radiol. 2017 Feb;46(2):217-222. doi: 10.1007/s00256-016-2539-8. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
6
Requirements for Minimum Sample Size for Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis.敏感性和特异性分析的最小样本量要求。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Oct;10(10):YE01-YE06. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18129.8744. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
7
Comparison of tibiofemoral joint space width measurements from standing CT and fixed flexion radiography.站立位CT与固定屈曲位X线摄影测量胫股关节间隙宽度的比较。
J Orthop Res. 2017 Jul;35(7):1388-1395. doi: 10.1002/jor.23387. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
8
Patellar position in weight-bearing radiographs compared with non-weight-bearing: significance for the detection of osteoarthritis.负重位X线片与非负重位X线片上髌骨位置的比较:对骨关节炎检测的意义
Acta Radiol. 2017 Mar;58(3):331-337. doi: 10.1177/0284185116652013. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
9
Correlations of Medial Joint Space Width on Fixed-Flexed Standing Computed Tomography and Radiographs With Cartilage and Meniscal Morphology on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.固定屈曲位站立计算机断层扫描和X线片上内侧关节间隙宽度与磁共振成像上软骨和半月板形态的相关性。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Oct;68(10):1410-6. doi: 10.1002/acr.22888.
10
Changes in patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joint cartilage damage and bone marrow lesions over 7 years: the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study.髌股关节和胫股关节软骨损伤及骨髓病变 7 年变化:多中心骨关节炎研究。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016 Jul;24(7):1160-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.01.981. Epub 2016 Feb 4.