Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 May-Jun;66:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.06.003.
Leadless pacemakers (LPs) have revolutionized the field of pacing by miniaturizing pacemakers and rendering them completelty intracardiac, hence reducing complications related to pacemaker pockets and transvenous leads. However, first generation LPs appear to be associated with a higher rate of myocardial perforation as compared to transvenous pacemakers (TV-PPM). Currently, LPs are predominantly designed to pace the right ventricle with no LPs that provide atrial or biventricular pacing. In this article, we review the available data on LPs while advocating for the need for a randomized controlled trial comparing LPs to TV-PPMs. In addition, we review the future directions of leadless devices.
无导线起搏器(LPs)通过缩小起搏器并使其完全置于心内来彻底改变起搏领域,从而减少与起搏器囊袋和经静脉导线相关的并发症。然而,第一代 LPs 似乎与经静脉起搏器(TV-PPM)相比,心肌穿孔的发生率更高。目前,LPs 主要设计用于右心室起搏,而没有提供心房或双心室起搏的 LPs。在本文中,我们回顾了关于 LPs 的现有数据,同时主张需要进行一项比较 LPs 与 TV-PPM 的随机对照试验。此外,我们还回顾了无导线设备的未来发展方向。