Suppr超能文献

无导线起搏器

Leadless Pacemakers.

作者信息

El-Chami Mikhael F, Merchant Faisal M, Leon Angel R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology-Section of Electrophysiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology-Section of Electrophysiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jan 1;119(1):145-148. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Nov 1.

Abstract

Leadless pacing is an emerging technology with the potential to significantly improve outcomes associated with the need for long-term pacing. Specifically, the major advantage of leadless systems is abolishing the need for transvenous leads and subcutaneous pockets, both of which account for most adverse events associated with traditional pacemakers. Two leadless pacemakers are currently available: the Nanostim (leadless cardiac pacemaker [LCP]) device (St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, California) and the Micra Transcatheter pacing system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota). These 2 pacemakers have shown promising results in clinical trials. In conclusion, in this review we summarize the results of the 2 investigational device exemption trials and compare the pros and cons of these devices to traditional transvenous pacemakers.

摘要

无导线起搏是一项新兴技术,有潜力显著改善与长期起搏需求相关的治疗效果。具体而言,无导线系统的主要优势在于无需经静脉导线和皮下囊袋,而这两者是传统起搏器相关大多数不良事件的根源。目前有两款无导线起搏器可供使用:Nanostim(无导线心脏起搏器 [LCP])装置(圣犹达医疗公司,加利福尼亚州西尔玛)和Micra经导管起搏系统(美敦力公司,明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯)。这两款起搏器在临床试验中已显示出令人期待的结果。总之,在本综述中,我们总结了两项研究性器械豁免试验的结果,并将这些器械与传统经静脉起搏器的优缺点进行了比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验