Suzuki Atsushi, Fujiwara Ryudo, Asada Hiroyuki, Iwasa Kohei, Miyata Tomohiro, Song Woo Hyung, Higuchi Kotaro, Seo Hidenobu, Sakamoto Yuki, Shimizu Masahiro, Soga Fumitaka, Shibata Hiroyuki, Kozuki Amane, Nagoshi Ryoji, Lehmann H Immo, Kijima Yoichi, Shite Junya
Department of Cardiology, Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital.
Department of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Corrigan Minehan Heart Center.
Circ J. 2022 Jan 25;86(2):256-265. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0423. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
The use of iodine contrast agents is one possible limitation in cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). This study investigated intracardiac echography (ICE)-guided contrast-free CBA.
The study was divided into 2 phases. First, 25 paroxysmal AF patients (Group 1) underwent CBA, and peri-balloon leak flow velocity (PLFV) was assessed using ICE and electrical pulmonary vein (PV) lesion gaps were assessed by high-density electroanatomical mapping. Then, 24 patients (Group 2) underwent ICE-guided CBA and were compared with 25 patients who underwent conventional CBA (historical controls). In Group 1, there was a significant correlation between PLFV and electrical PV gap diameter (r=-0.715, P<0.001). PLFV was higher without than with an electrical gap (mean [±SD] 127.0±28.6 vs. 66.6±21.0 cm/s; P<0.001) and the cut-off value of PLFV to predict electrical isolation was 105.7 cm/s (sensitivity 0.700, specificity 0.929). In Group 2, ICE-guided CBA was successfully performed with acute electrical isolation of all PVs and without the need for "rescue" contrast injection. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence at 6 months did not differ between ICE-guided and conventional CBA (3/24 [12.5%] vs. 5/25 [20.0%], respectively; P=0.973, log-rank test).
PLFV predicted the presence of an electrical PV gap after CBA. ICE-guided CBA was feasible and safe, and could potentially be performed completely contrast-free without a decrease in ablation efficacy.
碘造影剂的使用是心房颤动(AF)冷冻球囊消融(CBA)的一个可能限制因素。本研究调查了心腔内超声心动图(ICE)引导下的无造影剂CBA。
本研究分为两个阶段。首先,25例阵发性AF患者(第1组)接受CBA,使用ICE评估球囊周围漏血流速(PLFV),并通过高密度电解剖标测评估肺静脉(PV)电隔离间隙。然后,24例患者(第2组)接受ICE引导的CBA,并与25例接受传统CBA的患者(历史对照)进行比较。在第1组中,PLFV与PV电隔离间隙直径之间存在显著相关性(r = -0.715,P < 0.001)。无电隔离间隙时的PLFV高于有电隔离间隙时(平均值[±标准差]127.0±28.6 vs. 66.6±21.0 cm/s;P < 0.001),预测电隔离的PLFV临界值为105.7 cm/s(敏感性0.700,特异性0.929)。在第2组中,成功进行了ICE引导的CBA,所有PV均实现急性电隔离,无需“补救”造影剂注射。ICE引导和传统CBA在6个月时房性快速心律失常复发率无差异(分别为3/24 [12.5%] vs. 5/25 [20.0%];P = 0.973,对数秩检验)。
PLFV可预测CBA后PV电隔离间隙的存在。ICE引导的CBA可行且安全,有可能完全在无造影剂的情况下进行,且不降低消融效果。