Department of Cardiology, Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital, Yokkaichi, Mie, Japan.
Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Nov;32(11):2933-2942. doi: 10.1111/jce.15246. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
With regard to short-term outcome in atrial fibrillation (AF), the benefit of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) by pressing a balloon against the earliest pulmonary vein (PV) potential site during PV isolation (earliest potential [EP]-guided CBA) has been previously demonstrated. The present study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcome of the EP-guided CBA.
This study included 136 patients from two randomized studies, who underwent CBA for paroxysmal AF for the first time. Patients were randomly assigned to the EP-guided and conventional CBA groups in each study. In the EP-guided CBA group, we pressed a balloon against the EP site when the time-to-isolation (TTI) after cryoapplication exceeded 60 and 45 s in the first and second studies, respectively. We compared the clinical outcomes for 1 year after the procedure between the EP-guided CBA group (68 patients) and the conventional CBA group (68 patients). The primary endpoint was the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia after ablation. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups. Compared with the conventional CBA group, the EP-guided CBA group had a significantly higher success rate at TTI ≤ 90 s (98.5% vs. 90.0%, p < .001); lower touch-up rate and total cryoapplication; and shorter procedure time, and fluoroscopy time. The recurrence at 1 year after ablation was significantly lower in the EP-guided CBA group than in the conventional CBA group (6.0% vs. 19.4%; p = .019).
The EP-guided CBA approach can facilitate the ablation procedure and achieve low recurrence at 1 year after ablation.
在心房颤动(AF)的短期结果方面,通过在肺静脉(PV)隔离期间将球囊压在最早的 PV 电位部位上(最早电位[EP]-引导的 CBA)已经证明了冷冻球囊消融(CBA)的益处。本研究旨在评估 EP 引导的 CBA 的长期结果。
本研究包括来自两项随机研究的 136 名首次接受阵发性 AF 行 CBA 的患者。患者在每项研究中均被随机分配到 EP 引导和常规 CBA 组。在 EP 引导的 CBA 组中,当冷冻应用后的隔离时间(TTI)超过 60 和 45 秒时,我们将球囊压在 EP 部位,在第一项和第二项研究中分别为。我们比较了手术后 1 年 EP 引导的 CBA 组(68 例)和常规 CBA 组(68 例)之间的临床结果。主要终点是消融后心房心律失常的复发。两组之间的基线特征无显著差异。与常规 CBA 组相比,EP 引导的 CBA 组在 TTI≤90 秒时的成功率显著更高(98.5%对 90.0%,p<.001);冷冻球囊的触诊率和总应用率较低;手术时间和透视时间较短。消融后 1 年的复发率在 EP 引导的 CBA 组明显低于常规 CBA 组(6.0%对 19.4%;p=0.019)。
EP 引导的 CBA 方法可以促进消融过程,并在消融后 1 年实现低复发率。