• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠后肿瘤的外科治疗:270 例连续病例的法国多中心经验。

Surgical Management of Retrorectal Tumors: A French Multicentric Experience of 270 Consecutives Cases.

机构信息

Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Timone Hospital, Marseille, France.

Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2021 Nov 1;274(5):766-772. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005119.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005119
PMID:34334645
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report the largest multicentric experience on surgical management of retrorectal tumors (RRT).

BACKGROUND

Literature data on RRT is limited. There is no consensus concerning the best surgical approach for the management of RRT.

METHODS

Patients operated for RRT in 18 academic French centers were retrospectively included (2000-2019).

RESULTS

A total of 270 patients were included. Surgery was performed through abdominal (n = 72, 27%), bottom (n = 190, 70%), or combined approach (n = 8, 3%). Abdominal approach was laparoscopic in 53/72 (74%) and bottom approach was Kraske modified procedures in 169/190 (89%) patients. In laparoscopic abdominal group, tumors were more frequently symptomatic (37/53, 70% vs 88/169, 52%, P = 0.02), larger [mean diameter = 60.5 ± 24 (range, 13-107) vs 51 ± 26 (20-105) mm, P = 0.02] and located above S3 vertebra (n = 3/42, 7% vs 0%, P = 0.001) than those from Kraske modified group. Laparoscopy was associated with a higher risk of postoperative ileus (n = 4/53, 7.5% vs 0%, P = 0.002) and rectal fistula (n = 3/53, 6% vs 0%, P=0.01) but less wound abscess (n = 1/53, 2% vs 24/169, 14%, P = 0.02) than Kraske modified procedures. RRT was malignant in 8%. After a mean follow up of 27 ±39 (1-221) months, local recurrence was noted in 8% of the patients. After surgery, chronic pain was observed in 17% of the patients without significant difference between the 2 groups (15/74, 20% vs 3/30, 10%; P = 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Both laparoscopic and Kraske modified approaches can be used for surgical treatment of RRT (according to their location and their size), with similar long-term results.

摘要

目的

报告直肠后肿瘤(RRT)的最大多中心手术治疗经验。

背景

关于 RRT 的文献数据有限。对于 RRT 的治疗,尚无最佳手术方法的共识。

方法

回顾性纳入 18 个法国学术中心的 270 例 RRT 手术患者(2000-2019 年)。

结果

共纳入 270 例患者。手术通过腹部(n=72,27%)、盆底(n=190,70%)或联合入路(n=8,3%)进行。腹部入路腹腔镜手术 53 例(74%),盆底入路改良 Kraske 手术 169 例(89%)。在腹腔镜腹部组中,肿瘤更常出现症状(37/53,70% vs 88/169,52%,P=0.02),且更大[平均直径=60.5±24(范围,13-107) vs 51±26(20-105)mm,P=0.02],且位于 S3 椎体以上(n=3/42,7% vs 0%,P=0.001)的比例高于改良 Kraske 组。腹腔镜手术与术后肠梗阻(n=4/53,7.5% vs 0%,P=0.002)和直肠瘘(n=3/53,6% vs 0%,P=0.01)的风险较高,但与改良 Kraske 组相比,切口脓肿(n=1/53,2% vs 24/169,14%,P=0.02)的风险较低。RRT 恶性肿瘤占 8%。平均随访 27±39(1-221)个月后,8%的患者出现局部复发。术后慢性疼痛在 17%的患者中观察到,两组之间无显著差异(74 例中有 15 例,20% vs 30 例中有 3 例,10%;P=0.3)。

结论

腹腔镜和改良 Kraske 入路均可用于 RRT 的手术治疗(根据其位置和大小),长期结果相似。

相似文献

1
Surgical Management of Retrorectal Tumors: A French Multicentric Experience of 270 Consecutives Cases.直肠后肿瘤的外科治疗:270 例连续病例的法国多中心经验。
Ann Surg. 2021 Nov 1;274(5):766-772. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005119.
2
Laparoscopic resection of retrorectal tumors: a feasibility study in 12 consecutive patients.直肠后肿瘤腹腔镜切除术:12 例连续患者的可行性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Apr;28(4):1223-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3312-x. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
3
Minimally invasive approach for retrorectal tumors above and below S3: a multicentric tertiary center retrospective study (MiaRT study).经肛门直肠入路治疗 S3 以上和以下的直肠后肿瘤:一项多中心三级中心回顾性研究(MiaRT 研究)。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Jun 11;28(1):67. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02938-y.
4
Complications are increased with the need for an abdominal-assisted Kraske procedure.对于需要腹部辅助Kraske手术的情况,并发症会增加。
Am Surg. 2004 Mar;70(3):193-6; discussion 197.
5
Surgical resection of retrorectal tumours in adults: long-term results in 47 patients.成人直肠后肿瘤的外科切除术:47 例患者的长期结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Aug;15(8):e476-82. doi: 10.1111/codi.12255.
6
Surgical management of retro-rectal tumors in the adult.成人直肠后肿瘤的外科治疗。
J Visc Surg. 2019 Jun;156(3):229-237. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 May 10.
7
Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between robotic, laparoscopic, and open rectal cancer surgery: early experience at a tertiary care center.机器人辅助、腹腔镜和开放直肠癌手术的临床及经济结果比较:三级医疗中心的早期经验
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1337-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4390-8. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
8
Influence of conversion on the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer compared with primarily open resection.与直接开放手术相比,腹腔镜直肠癌切除术中转对围手术期和肿瘤学结局的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4675-83. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3108-z. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
9
[Curative resection with minilaparotomy approach in the treatment of rectal cancer].小切口剖腹术入路根治性切除治疗直肠癌
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 25;21(3):305-311.
10
A systematic review of minimally invasive surgery for retrorectal tumors.经直肠入路微创手术治疗直肠后肿瘤的系统评价
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Apr;22(4):255-263. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1781-6. Epub 2018 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Recurrent rectal cancer cured by transsacral prone longitudinal incision combined with bilateral gluteus maximus "kite" flap filling: a case report.经骶骨俯卧纵向切口联合双侧臀大肌“风筝”皮瓣填充治愈复发性直肠癌:一例报告
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 27;15:1550960. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1550960. eCollection 2025.
2
A Case of Epidermal Cyst in the Retrorectum Safely Resected by a Combined Laparoscopic Approach.1例经腹腔镜联合入路安全切除的直肠后表皮样囊肿病例
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;18(1):e70068. doi: 10.1111/ases.70068.
3
Tailgut Cyst-Gynecologist's Pitfall: Literature Review and Case Report.
尾肠囊肿——妇科医生的陷阱:文献综述与病例报告
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jan 4;15(1):108. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15010108.
4
The management of retrorectal tumors - a single-center analysis of 21 cases and overview of the literature.直肠后肿瘤的治疗——单中心 21 例分析及文献复习。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Sep 14;409(1):279. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03471-0.
5
Minimally invasive approach for retrorectal tumors above and below S3: a multicentric tertiary center retrospective study (MiaRT study).经肛门直肠入路治疗 S3 以上和以下的直肠后肿瘤:一项多中心三级中心回顾性研究(MiaRT 研究)。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Jun 11;28(1):67. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02938-y.
6
Surgical outcomes after reoperation for patients with recurrent presacral tumors: a retrospective study.复发性骶前肿瘤患者再次手术后的手术结果:一项回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb 15;22(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03332-6.
7
Is There Another Posterior Approach for Presacral Tumors Besides the Kraske Procedure? - A Study on the Feasibility and Safety of Surgical Resection of Primary Presacral Tumors Transsacrococcygeal Transverse Incision.除了克拉斯克手术外,骶前肿瘤还有其他后路手术方法吗?——经骶尾横切口对原发性骶前肿瘤手术切除的可行性和安全性研究
Front Oncol. 2022 May 26;12:892027. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.892027. eCollection 2022.
8
Promoting Laparoscopic Anterior Approach for a Very Low Presacral Primary Neuroendocrine Tumor Arising in a Tailgut Cyst.推广腹腔镜前路手术治疗尾肠囊肿起源的极低骶前原发性神经内分泌肿瘤。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Apr 26;10(5):805. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050805.