Feingold Alan
Oregon Social Learning Center, Eugene, OR.
Struct Equ Modeling. 2021;28(4):609-621. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2021.1878895. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
The difference between groups in their random slopes is frequently examined in latent growth modeling to evaluate treatment efficacy. However, when end centering is used for model parameterization with a randomized design, the difference in the random intercepts is the model-estimated mean difference between the groups at the end of the study, which has the same expected value as the product of the coefficient for the slope difference and study duration. A Monte Carlo study found that (a) the statistical power to detect the treatment effect was greater when determined from the intercept instead of the slope difference, and (b) the standard error of the model-estimated mean difference was smaller when obtained from the intercept difference. Investigators may reduce Type II errors by comparing groups in random intercepts instead of random slopes to test treatment effects, and should therefore conduct power assessments using end centering to detect each difference.
在潜在增长模型中,经常会检验组间随机斜率的差异,以评估治疗效果。然而,当在随机设计中使用端点中心化进行模型参数化时,随机截距的差异是研究结束时模型估计的组间平均差异,其期望值与斜率差异系数和研究持续时间的乘积相同。一项蒙特卡洛研究发现:(a)从截距而非斜率差异确定治疗效果时,检测治疗效果的统计功效更大;(b)从截距差异获得的模型估计平均差异的标准误差更小。研究者可以通过比较随机截距而非随机斜率来检验治疗效果,从而减少II类错误,因此应该使用端点中心化进行功效评估,以检测每种差异。