Coluzzi Flaminia, Alvaro Domenico, Caraceni Augusto Tommaso, Gianni Walter, Marinangeli Franco, Massazza Giuseppe, Pinto Carmine, Varrassi Giustino, Lugoboni Fabio
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Latina, LT, Italy.
Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Pain Medicine Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, RM, Italy.
J Pain Res. 2021 Jul 24;14:2255-2264. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S318564. eCollection 2021.
Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) remains an important clinical obstacle despite the availability of several guidelines and pharmacological options for its management. Here, we surveyed common practices and perceptions about OIC among physicians who prescribe opioids in Italy.
The online survey included 26 questions about OIC. Responses were analyzed descriptively and aggregated by physician specialty.
A total of 501 physicians completed the survey. Most respondents (67%) did not feel adequately educated about OIC despite general consensus regarding interest in the topic. Overall, 62-75% of physicians regularly evaluated intestinal function or OIC symptoms in patients receiving opioid therapy. The most common method for assessment was patient diary; few physicians used a validated instrument such as the Rome IV criteria. Psychiatrists and addiction specialists showed the lowest interest and poorest practices. Most respondents (78%) preferred macrogol prophylaxis followed by macrogol plus another laxative for first-line treatment of OIC symptoms. Peripheral-acting mu opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) were not widely used among physicians; 61% had never prescribed a PAMORA for OIC.
Our findings reveal important differences in clinical practice for OIC across physician specialties. Additional formative efforts are necessary to improve awareness about best practices in OIC.
尽管有多项指南及多种药物治疗方案可用于管理阿片类药物引起的便秘(OIC),但它仍是一个重要的临床难题。在此,我们对意大利开具阿片类药物处方的医生关于OIC的常见做法和认知进行了调查。
在线调查包含26个关于OIC的问题。对回答进行描述性分析,并按医生专业进行汇总。
共有501名医生完成了调查。尽管普遍认为对该主题感兴趣,但大多数受访者(67%)觉得自己对OIC的了解不够充分。总体而言,62%至75%的医生会定期评估接受阿片类药物治疗患者的肠道功能或OIC症状。最常用的评估方法是患者日记;很少有医生使用如罗马IV标准这样经过验证的工具。精神科医生和成瘾专科医生的兴趣最低,做法也最差。大多数受访者(78%)首选聚乙二醇预防,其次是聚乙二醇加另一种泻药用于OIC症状的一线治疗。外周作用型μ阿片受体拮抗剂(PAMORA)在医生中未得到广泛使用;61%的医生从未为OIC开具过PAMORA。
我们的研究结果揭示了不同医生专业在OIC临床实践中的重要差异。需要进一步开展培训工作以提高对OIC最佳实践的认识。