Hasegawa Naoya, Tanaka Shintaro, Mani Hiroki, Inoue Takahiro, Wang Yun, Watanabe Kazuhiko, Asaka Tadayoshi
Department of Rehabilitation Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Jul 15;15:674960. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.674960. eCollection 2021.
Effective training of the backward step response could be beneficial to improve postural stability and prevent falls. Unpredicted perturbation-based balance training (PBT), widely known as compensatory-step training, may enhance the fear of falling and the patterns of postural muscle co-contraction. Contrastingly, PBT with predictable direction or both direction and timing would suppress the fear and the co-contraction patterns during training, but the efficacy of predictable PBT for unpredictable perturbations is still unknown.
To compare the adaptation effects of compensatory-step training with and without predictable perturbations on backward stepping against unpredictable perturbations.
Thirty-three healthy young adults were randomly assigned to one of the following step training groups: Unpredicted, Predicted, and Self-initiated. In training sessions, participants were perturbed to induce a compensatory step with (Predicted group) or without (Unpredicted group) knowledge of the perturbation's direction or while knowing both the direction and timing of the perturbation (Self-initiated group). In test sessions (pre- and post-training), participants were instructed to recover their postural stability in response to an unpredicted perturbation. The margin of stability (MOS), center of mass (COM) shift, and step characteristics were measured during a backward step in both test and training sessions.
All three groups showed a significant increase in the step length and velocity in the post-training sessions compared to those in the pre-training sessions. Moreover, in the Unpredicted and Predicted groups, but not in the Self-initiated group, the MOS at step contact was significantly increased following the training session. In addition, the Self-initiated group showed a significant increase in COM shift at 50 ms after slip onset during training compared to the Unpredicted and Predicted groups.
Unpredicted and predicted PBT improve step characteristics during backward stepping against unpredictable perturbations. Moreover, the unpredictable PBT and PBT with direction-predictable perturbations enhance the feedback postural control reflected as the postural stability at step contact.
有效训练向后步反应可能有助于提高姿势稳定性并预防跌倒。基于不可预测扰动的平衡训练(PBT),即广为人知的补偿性步训练,可能会增强跌倒恐惧以及姿势肌肉协同收缩模式。相比之下,具有可预测方向或方向与时间均已知的PBT会在训练期间抑制恐惧和协同收缩模式,但可预测PBT对不可预测扰动的效果仍不清楚。
比较有和没有可预测扰动的补偿性步训练对对抗不可预测扰动向后迈步的适应效果。
33名健康年轻成年人被随机分配到以下步训练组之一:不可预测组、可预测组和自我启动组。在训练环节中,参与者受到扰动以诱发补偿性步,其中可预测组(可预测组)知道扰动方向,不可预测组(不可预测组)不知道扰动方向,自我启动组(自我启动组)同时知道扰动方向和时间。在测试环节(训练前和训练后),参与者被指示对不可预测扰动做出反应以恢复姿势稳定性。在测试和训练环节的向后步过程中测量稳定性边际(MOS)、重心(COM)位移和步特征。
与训练前相比,所有三组在训练后步长和速度均显著增加。此外,在不可预测组和可预测组中,而非自我启动组,训练后步接触时的MOS显著增加。此外,与不可预测组和可预测组相比,自我启动组在训练期间滑倒开始后50毫秒时COM位移显著增加。
不可预测和可预测的PBT可改善对抗不可预测扰动向后迈步时的步特征。此外,不可预测的PBT和具有方向可预测扰动的PBT可增强作为步接触时姿势稳定性反映出的反馈姿势控制。