Kumari Kavita, Naskar Malay, Aftabuddin Md, Das Sarkar Soma, Ghosh Bandana Das, Sarkar Uttam Kumar, Nag Subir Kumar, Jana Chayna, Das Basanta Kumar
Aquatic Environmental Biotechnology and Nanotechnology Division, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, India.
Fisheries Resource Assessment and Informatics Division, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, India.
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jul 14;12:643945. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.643945. eCollection 2021.
The ultimate role of prokaryote (bacteria and archaea), the decomposer of the wetland ecosystem, depends on its community structure and its interaction with the environment. The present study has used three universal prokaryote primers to compare prokaryote community structure and diversity of three distinctly different wetlands. The study results revealed that α-diversity indices and phylogenetic differential abundance patterns did not differ significantly among primers, but they did differ significantly across wetlands. Microbial community composition revealed a distinct pattern for each primer in each wetland. Overall comparison of prokaryote communities in sediments of three wetlands revealed the highest prokaryote richness and diversity in Bhomra (freshwater wetland) followed by Malencho (brackish-water wetland) and East Kolkata wetland (EKW) (sewage-fed wetland). Indicator genus analysis identified 21, 4, and 29 unique indicator genera, having preferential abode for Bhomra, EKW, and Malencho, respectively. Prediction of potential roles of these microbes revealed a preference for sulfate-reducing microbes in Malencho and methanogens in Bhomra. The distinct phylogenetic differential abundance pattern, microbial abode preference, and their potential functional role predict ecosystem variables shaping microbial diversity. The variation in community composition of prokaryotes in response to ecosystem variables can serve as the most sensitive bioindicator of wetland ecosystem assessment and management.
作为湿地生态系统分解者的原核生物(细菌和古生菌)的最终作用,取决于其群落结构及其与环境的相互作用。本研究使用了三种通用的原核生物引物,来比较三种截然不同的湿地中原核生物的群落结构和多样性。研究结果表明,α多样性指数和系统发育差异丰度模式在引物之间没有显著差异,但在不同湿地之间存在显著差异。微生物群落组成在每个湿地的每种引物中都呈现出独特的模式。对三个湿地沉积物中原核生物群落的总体比较显示,博姆拉(淡水湿地)的原核生物丰富度和多样性最高,其次是马伦乔(咸水湿地)和加尔各答东部湿地(EKW,污水补给湿地)。指示属分析确定了分别在博姆拉、EKW和马伦乔中具有优先栖息地的21个、4个和29个独特指示属。对这些微生物潜在作用的预测显示,马伦乔中偏好硫酸盐还原微生物,而博姆拉中偏好产甲烷菌。不同的系统发育差异丰度模式、微生物栖息地偏好及其潜在功能作用,预测了塑造微生物多样性的生态系统变量。原核生物群落组成响应生态系统变量的变化,可以作为湿地生态系统评估和管理中最敏感的生物指标。