Batchelor R, Thomas C, Gardiner B J, Lee S J, Fleming S, Wei A, Coutsouvelis J, Ananda-Rajah M
Department of General Medicine, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Infectious Diseases Alfred Health Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Mar 8;8(7):ofab113. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab113. eCollection 2021 Jul.
Patients unable to take azoles are a neglected group lacking a standardized approach to antifungal prophylaxis. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of intermittent liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) prophylaxis in a heterogenous group of hematology patients.
A retrospective cohort of all hematology patients who received a course of intravenous L-AMB, defined as 1 mg/kg thrice weekly from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2018, were identified from pharmacy records. Outcomes included breakthrough-invasive fungal disease (BIFD), reasons for premature discontinuation, and acute kidney injury.
There were 198 patients who received 273 courses of L-AMB prophylaxis. Using a conservative definition, the BIFD rate was 9.6% (n = 19 of 198) occurring either during L-AMB prophylaxis or up to 7 days from cessation in patients who received a course. Probable/proven BIFD occurred in 13 patients (6.6%, 13 of 198), including molds in 54% (n = 7) and non- Candidemia in 46% (n = 6). Cumulative incidence of BIFD was highest in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (6.8%) followed by acute lymphoblastic leukemia (2.7%) and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (2.5%). The most common indication for L-AMB was chemotherapy, or anticancer drug-azole interactions (75% of courses) dominated by vincristine, or acute myeloid leukemia clinical trials, followed by gut absorption concerns (13%) and liver function abnormalities (8.8%). Acute kidney injury, using a modified international definition, complicated 27% of courses but was not clinically significant, accounting for only 3.3% (9 of 273) of discontinuations.
Our findings demonstrate a high rate of BIFD among patients receiving L-AMB prophylaxis. Pragmatic trials will help researchers find the optimal regimen of L-AMB prophylaxis for the many clinical scenarios in which azoles are unsuitable, especially as targeted anticancer drugs increase in use.
无法使用唑类药物的患者是一个被忽视的群体,缺乏标准化的抗真菌预防方法。我们评估了间歇性脂质体两性霉素B(L-AMB)预防在异质性血液学患者群体中的有效性和安全性。
从药房记录中识别出所有接受过静脉注射L-AMB疗程的血液学患者的回顾性队列,静脉注射L-AMB疗程定义为2013年7月1日至2018年6月30日期间每周三次,每次1mg/kg。结果包括突破性侵袭性真菌病(BIFD)、提前停药原因和急性肾损伤。
198例患者接受了273个疗程的L-AMB预防。采用保守定义,BIFD发生率为9.6%(198例中的19例),发生在L-AMB预防期间或接受一个疗程的患者停药后7天内。可能/确诊的BIFD发生在13例患者中(6.6%,198例中的13例),其中霉菌感染占54%(7例),非念珠菌血症占46%(6例)。BIFD的累积发生率在急性髓系白血病患者中最高(6.8%),其次是急性淋巴细胞白血病(2.7%)和异基因干细胞移植(2.5%)。L-AMB最常见的适应证是化疗、抗癌药物-唑类相互作用(占疗程的75%),主要由长春新碱或急性髓系白血病临床试验引起,其次是肠道吸收问题(13%)和肝功能异常(8.8%)。采用改良的国际定义,急性肾损伤使27%的疗程复杂化,但在临床上并不显著,仅占停药的3.3%(273例中的9例)。
我们的研究结果表明,接受L-AMB预防的患者中BIFD发生率很高。实用的试验将有助于研究人员为许多唑类药物不适用的临床情况找到L-AMB预防的最佳方案,尤其是随着靶向抗癌药物使用的增加。