• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于胰液积聚的管腔贴合金属支架的性能特征:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Performance Characteristics of a Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent for Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Prospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Dhillon Amit, Li Suqing, Sandha Simrat, D'Souza Pernilla, Sandha Gurpal

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul 28;4(4):158-164. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwaa023. eCollection 2021 Aug.

DOI:10.1093/jcag/gwaa023
PMID:34337315
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8320260/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage is the preferred management of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). Optimizing drainage is important and there remains debate as to the choice of stent. A recent trend towards the use of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) has emerged.

AIM

To evaluate the performance characteristics of a LAMS based on a prospective protocol (CT scan 1 week after placement to assess for resolution and need for necrosectomy followed by stent removal within 3 weeks).

METHODS

This is a descriptive prospective cohort study performed at a single centre. The primary outcome was clinical success. Secondary outcomes were technical success, procedure time, total number of endoscopic procedures with or without necrosectomy, stent indwell time, stent functionality and adverse events.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (21 males, mean age 46.5 years) underwent placement of LAMS for 41 PFCs (median size 12 cm). There were 18 pseudocysts and 23 walled-off necrosis. Clinical success was seen in 33 of 41 (80%) PFCs. Of the remaining eight patients, six underwent surgery and two patients died from underlying malignant disease (although their PFC had completely resolved). Technical success and stent functionality were 100%. The median procedure time was 14 min (interquartile range 11 min to 20 min). Of the 23 walled-off necrosis, 9 (39%) required necrosectomy. The median stent indwell time was 19 days (interquartile range 14 to 22 days). There were no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Our protocol demonstrates excellent performance characteristics of LAMS. Their clinical efficacy and favourable safety profile suggest that they may be the preferred modality for endoscopic ultrasound-guided management of PFCs.

摘要

背景

内镜超声引导下经壁引流是胰腺液体积聚(PFCs)的首选治疗方法。优化引流很重要,关于支架的选择仍存在争议。最近出现了使用管腔贴附金属支架(LAMS)的趋势。

目的

根据前瞻性方案(放置后1周进行CT扫描以评估消退情况及是否需要坏死组织清除术,随后在3周内取出支架)评估一种LAMS的性能特征。

方法

这是一项在单一中心进行的描述性前瞻性队列研究。主要结局是临床成功。次要结局包括技术成功、手术时间、有无坏死组织清除术的内镜手术总数、支架留置时间、支架功能及不良事件。

结果

37例患者(21例男性,平均年龄46.5岁)因41个PFCs接受了LAMS置入(中位大小12 cm)。其中有18个假性囊肿和23个包裹性坏死。41个PFCs中有33个(80%)获得临床成功。其余8例患者中,6例接受了手术,2例患者死于基础恶性疾病(尽管其PFC已完全消退)。技术成功率和支架功能均为100%。中位手术时间为14分钟(四分位间距11分钟至20分钟)。23个包裹性坏死中,9个(39%)需要进行坏死组织清除术。中位支架留置时间为19天(四分位间距14至22天)。无严重不良事件。

结论

我们的方案显示LAMS具有出色的性能特征。其临床疗效和良好的安全性表明,它们可能是内镜超声引导下治疗PFCs的首选方式。

相似文献

1
Performance Characteristics of a Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent for Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Prospective Cohort Study.用于胰液积聚的管腔贴合金属支架的性能特征:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul 28;4(4):158-164. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwaa023. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents in Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: Are They Better Than Plastic Stents? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腔内置入金属支架治疗胰腺积液的疗效和安全性:它们优于塑料支架吗?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Feb;63(2):289-301. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4851-0. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
3
Feasibility, safety, and outcomes of a single-step endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections without fluoroscopy using a novel electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing, self-expanding metal stent.使用新型电灼增强型管腔贴附自膨式金属支架在无荧光透视情况下单步内镜超声引导下引流胰腺液体积聚的可行性、安全性及结果
Endosc Ultrasound. 2017 Mar-Apr;6(2):131-135. doi: 10.4103/2303-9027.204814.
4
Comparative outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided lumen-apposing mental stents drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis: Case series and meta-analysis.内镜超声引导下管腔贴附金属支架引流治疗胰腺假性囊肿和包裹性坏死的比较结果:病例系列和荟萃分析
Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2021 Aug 11;7(3):157-168. doi: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2021.07.001. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
A novel lumen-apposing metal stent for endoscopic drainage of symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections: a retrospective study.一种用于有症状胰液积聚内镜引流的新型管腔贴合金属支架:一项回顾性研究。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2024 Jan-Feb;13(1):40-45. doi: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000039. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
6
The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents.内镜超声引导下经腔引流治疗胰腺液体积聚的进展:双猪尾塑料支架、传统金属支架和管腔贴附金属支架的临床及成本效益比较
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2018 Sep 12;3(1):26-35. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwy049. eCollection 2020 Feb.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Lumen-Apposing Stents for Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections in a Community Hospital Setting.管腔对接支架在社区医院环境中治疗胰液积聚的疗效和安全性
Clin Endosc. 2020 Jul;53(4):480-486. doi: 10.5946/ce.2019.116. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
8
EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections and necrosis by using a novel lumen-apposing stent: a large retrospective, multicenter U.S. experience (with videos).EUS 引导下使用新型通道吻合支架对胰周液体积聚和坏死进行引流:一项大型回顾性、多中心美国经验(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Apr;83(4):699-707. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.020. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
9
Endoscopic Therapy With Lumen-apposing Metal Stents Is Safe and Effective for Patients With Pancreatic Walled-off Necrosis.内镜下置放吻合金属支架治疗胰腺假性囊肿安全有效。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Dec;14(12):1797-1803. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 May 14.
10
Drainage of pancreatic fluid collections using a lumen-apposing metal stent with an electrocautery-enhanced delivery system.使用带有电灼增强输送系统的管腔贴合金属支架引流胰腺液性渗出物。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Dec;36(12):3395-3401. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15658. Epub 2021 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Standardized approach to removal of lumen apposing metal stents following endoscopic necrosectomy: one size does not fit all.内镜坏死组织清除术后取出管腔贴附金属支架的标准化方法:一种方法并不适用于所有情况。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Mar 31;18:17562848251320739. doi: 10.1177/17562848251320739. eCollection 2025.
2
Safety and efficacy of early versus late removal of LAMS for pancreatic fluid collections.早期与晚期移除用于胰液积聚的LAMS的安全性和有效性
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Feb 28;12(2):E317-E323. doi: 10.1055/a-2226-0840. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Periesophageal Tuberculosis Abscess Post-Liver Transplantation Successfully Treated With Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent Cyst Esophagostomy.

本文引用的文献

1
The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents.内镜超声引导下经腔引流治疗胰腺液体积聚的进展:双猪尾塑料支架、传统金属支架和管腔贴附金属支架的临床及成本效益比较
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2018 Sep 12;3(1):26-35. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwy049. eCollection 2020 Feb.
2
Lumen-apposing stents versus plastic stents in the management of pancreatic pseudocysts: a large, comparative, international, multicenter study. lumen 对位支架与塑料支架治疗胰腺假性囊肿的比较:一项大型、国际性、多中心、比较研究。
Endoscopy. 2019 Nov;51(11):1035-1043. doi: 10.1055/a-0759-1353. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
3
肝移植术后食管周围结核脓肿经腔内置入金属支架囊肿食管造口术成功治愈
ACG Case Rep J. 2023 Dec 9;10(12):e01216. doi: 10.14309/crj.0000000000001216. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Plastic stents are more cost-effective than lumen-apposing metal stents in management of pancreatic pseudocysts.在胰腺假性囊肿的治疗中,塑料支架比管腔贴附金属支架更具成本效益。
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Jul;6(7):E780-E788. doi: 10.1055/a-0611-5082. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
4
Non-superiority of lumen-apposing metal stents over plastic stents for drainage of walled-off necrosis in a randomised trial.随机试验表明,金属支架与塑料支架在隔离性坏死引流方面并无优劣之分。
Gut. 2019 Jul;68(7):1200-1209. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315335. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing lumen-apposing metal stents with plastic stents in the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis.比较采用金属支架与塑料支架治疗胰腺包裹性坏死的成本效果分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Aug;88(2):267-276.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Apr 1.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents in Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: Are They Better Than Plastic Stents? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腔内置入金属支架治疗胰腺积液的疗效和安全性:它们优于塑料支架吗?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Feb;63(2):289-301. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4851-0. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
7
A comparison of outcomes between a lumen-apposing metal stent with electrocautery-enhanced delivery system and a bi-flanged metal stent for drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis.带有电灼增强输送系统的管腔贴合金属支架与双凸缘金属支架用于引流包裹性胰腺坏死的疗效比较。
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Dec;5(12):E1189-E1196. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-120831. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
8
Endoscopic or surgical step-up approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis: a multicentre randomised trial.内镜或手术升级治疗感染性坏死性胰腺炎:一项多中心随机试验。
Lancet. 2018 Jan 6;391(10115):51-58. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32404-2. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
9
Large-caliber metal stents versus plastic stents for the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis.大口径金属支架与塑料支架治疗胰腺坏死性包裹性积液。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan;87(1):141-149. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.04.032. Epub 2017 May 3.
10
Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) for pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) drainage: may not be business as usual.用于胰液积聚(PFC)引流的管腔对接金属支架(LAMS):可能并非一如既往。
Gut. 2017 Dec;66(12):2054-2056. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312812. Epub 2016 Aug 31.