Patel Amit K, Lane Brian R, Chintalapati Prateek, Fouad Lina, Butaney Mohit, Budzyn Jeffrey, Johnson Anna, Qi Ji, Schervish Edward, Rogers Craig G
Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021 Jun 24;30:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.06.004. eCollection 2021 Aug.
Renal mass biopsy (RMB) has had limited and varied utilization to guide management of renal masses (RM).
To evaluate utilization of RMB for newly diagnosed cT1 RMs across diverse practice types and assess associations of outcomes with RMB.
MUSIC-KIDNEY commenced data collection in September 2017 for all newly presenting patients with a cT1 RM at 14 diverse practices. Patients were assessed at ≥120 d after initial evaluation.
Demographics and outcomes were compared for patients undergoing RMB versus no RMB. Clinical and demographic characteristics were summarized by RMB status using a χ test for categorical variables and Student test for continuous variables. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was constructed to identify associations with RMB receipt.
RMB was performed in 15.5% ( = 282) of 1808 patients with a cT1 RM. Practice level rates varied from 0% to 100% ( = 0.001), with only five of 14 practices using RMB in >20% of patients. On multivariate analysis, predictors of RMB included greater comorbidity (Charlson comorbidity index ≥2 vs 0: odds ratio [OR] 1.44; = 0.025) and solid lesion type (cystic vs solid: OR 0.17; = 0.001; indeterminate vs solid: OR 0.58; = 0.01). RMB patients were less likely to have benign pathology at intervention (5.0% vs 13.5%; = 0.01). No radical nephrectomies were performed for patients with benign histology at RMB. The limitations include short follow-up and inclusion of practices with low numbers of RMBs.
Utilization of RMB varied widely across practices. Factors associated with RMB include comorbidities and lesion type. Patients undergoing RMB were less likely to have benign histology at intervention.
Current use of biopsy for kidney tumors is low and varies across our collaborative. Biopsy was performed in patients with greater comorbidity (more additional medical conditions) and for solid kidney tumors. Pretreatment biopsy is associated with lower nonmalignant pathology detected at treatment.
肾肿物活检(RMB)在指导肾肿物(RM)的管理方面应用有限且存在差异。
评估不同执业类型中新诊断的cT1期RM患者的RMB应用情况,并评估结果与RMB的相关性。
设计、设置和参与者:MUSIC-KIDNEY于2017年9月开始收集14种不同执业机构中所有新诊断为cT1期RM的患者的数据。在初始评估后≥120天对患者进行评估。
比较接受RMB和未接受RMB的患者的人口统计学和结局。使用分类变量的χ检验和连续变量的Student检验,按RMB状态总结临床和人口统计学特征。构建混合效应逻辑回归模型以确定与接受RMB的相关性。
1808例cT1期RM患者中有15.5%(n = 282)接受了RMB。执业机构层面的使用率从0%到100%不等(P = 0.001),14个执业机构中只有5个在超过20%的患者中使用RMB。多因素分析显示,接受RMB的预测因素包括更高的合并症(Charlson合并症指数≥2 vs 0:比值比[OR] 1.44;P = 0.025)和实性病变类型(囊性vs实性:OR 0.17;P = 0.001;不确定vs实性:OR 0.58;P = 0.01)。接受RMB的患者在干预时病理为良性的可能性较小(5.0% vs 13.5%;P = 0.01)。接受RMB且组织学为良性的患者未进行根治性肾切除术。局限性包括随访时间短以及纳入的RMB数量较少的执业机构。
RMB的应用在不同执业机构中差异很大。与RMB相关的因素包括合并症和病变类型。接受RMB的患者在干预时组织学为良性的可能性较小。
目前肾脏肿瘤活检的应用率较低,且在我们的合作机构中存在差异。活检用于合并症较多(更多其他疾病)的患者以及实性肾肿瘤。治疗前活检与治疗时检测到的非恶性病理结果较低相关。