Boynton Dennis N, Mirza Mahin, Van Til Monica, Butaney Mohit, Noyes Sabrina L, Seifman Brian, Jafri Mohammed, Ghani Khurshid R, Rogers Craig G, Lane Brian R
Department of Surgery, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Urol Pract. 2025 Jan;12(1):148-156. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000710. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
How renal mass biopsy (RMB) impacts patient management with T1 renal masses (T1RMs) is unclear. We explore the association between RMB and utilization of active surveillance (AS), nephron-sparing interventions, and radical nephrectomy (RN).
Data were analyzed retrospectively using the MUSIC-KIDNEY (Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative Kidney Mass: Identifying and Defining Necessary Evaluation and Therapy) registry. Treatment received was analyzed using a fitted mixed-effects multinomial logistic-regression model.
Of 4062 patients, 19.6% underwent RMB. Factors associated with RMB included younger age, higher Charlson comorbidity score, tumor size > 2.0 cm, and higher complexity tumors. AS was selected by 88%, 68%, and 27% of patients with benign, indeterminate, and malignant RMB findings. Nonmalignant pathology at surgery was significantly ( < .0001) more common without RMB (vs after RMB), ie, 14.8% vs 7.2% of PN and 10.2% vs 1.7% of RN. In patients with T1bRM managed without vs with RMB, AS was chosen by 22% vs 34%, nephron-sparing interventions by 31% vs 35%, and RN by 47% vs 32% ( = .0027). An interaction between tumor stage (T1a vs T1b) and RMB remained in multivariable analyses accounting for practice-level variation and other confounding variables. The risk-adjusted RN rate for T1bRM was 41.4% without RMB vs 27.8% with RMB; 7.4 RMBs are needed to avoid 1 RN (number needed to treat) for benign or indolent disease.
Treatments received by T1RM patients undergoing RMB are different than when RMB is omitted, based on RMB results and several confounders. T1RM patients benefit from reduction in intervention for nonmalignant disease, particularly when RN is planned. For every 7 biopsies of T1bRM performed, 1 RN was avoided.
肾肿物活检(RMB)如何影响T1期肾肿物(T1RMs)患者的治疗尚不清楚。我们探讨了RMB与主动监测(AS)、保留肾单位干预措施及根治性肾切除术(RN)应用之间的关联。
使用MUSIC-KIDNEY(密歇根泌尿外科手术改善协作组肾肿物:确定和定义必要的评估与治疗)登记处的数据进行回顾性分析。采用拟合混合效应多项逻辑回归模型分析所接受的治疗。
在4062例患者中,19.6%接受了RMB。与RMB相关的因素包括年龄较小、Charlson合并症评分较高、肿瘤大小>2.0 cm以及肿瘤复杂性较高。AS分别被88%、68%和27%的具有良性、不确定和恶性RMB结果的患者所选择。手术时非恶性病理在未进行RMB(与进行RMB后相比)时显著(<.0001)更常见,即部分肾切除术(PN)分别为14.8%对7.2%,RN分别为10.2%对1.7%。在未进行与进行RMB的T1bRM患者中,选择AS的比例分别为22%对34%,选择保留肾单位干预措施的比例分别为31%对35%,选择RN的比例分别为47%对32%(P =.0027)。在多变量分析中,肿瘤分期(T1a与T1b)和RMB之间的相互作用仍然存在,该分析考虑了实践水平差异和其他混杂变量。对于T1bRM,未进行RMB时风险调整后的RN率为41.4%,进行RMB时为27.8%;对于良性或惰性疾病,需要进行7.4次RMB才能避免1次RN(治疗所需数量)。
根据RMB结果和几个混杂因素,接受RMB的T1RM患者所接受的治疗与未进行RMB时不同。T1RM患者受益于非恶性疾病干预的减少,尤其是在计划进行RN时。每进行7次T1bRM活检,可避免1次RN。