Suppr超能文献

动机性访谈中的行为分类分析

Analysis of Behavior Classification in Motivational Interviewing.

作者信息

Tavabi Leili, Tran Trang, Stefanov Kalin, Borsari Brian, Woolley Joshua D, Scherer Stefan, Soleymani Mohammad

机构信息

Institute for Creative Technologies, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Proc Conf. 2021 Jun;2021:110-115. doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.clpsych-1.13.

Abstract

Analysis of client and therapist behavior in counseling sessions can provide helpful insights for assessing the quality of the session and consequently, the client's behavioral outcome. In this paper, we study the automatic classification of standardized behavior codes (i.e. annotations) used for assessment of psychotherapy sessions in Motivational Interviewing (MI). We develop models and examine the classification of client behaviors throughout MI sessions, comparing the performance by models trained on large pretrained embeddings (RoBERTa) versus interpretable and expert-selected features (LIWC). Our best performing model using the pretrained RoBERTa embeddings beats the baseline model, achieving an F1 score of 0.66 in the subject-independent 3-class classification. Through statistical analysis on the classification results, we identify prominent LIWC features that may not have been captured by the model using pretrained embeddings. Although classification using LIWC features underperforms RoBERTa, our findings motivate the future direction of incorporating auxiliary tasks in the classification of MI codes.

摘要

对咨询过程中客户和治疗师行为的分析可为评估咨询过程的质量以及客户的行为结果提供有益的见解。在本文中,我们研究了用于动机性访谈(MI)中心理治疗过程评估的标准化行为代码(即注释)的自动分类。我们开发模型并检查整个MI过程中客户行为的分类,比较在大型预训练嵌入(RoBERTa)上训练的模型与可解释且由专家选择的特征(LIWC)的性能。我们使用预训练的RoBERTa嵌入的最佳性能模型优于基线模型,在独立于主体的3类分类中实现了0.66的F1分数。通过对分类结果的统计分析,我们确定了使用预训练嵌入的模型可能未捕获的突出LIWC特征。尽管使用LIWC特征的分类性能不如RoBERTa,但我们的发现为MI代码分类中纳入辅助任务的未来方向提供了动力。

相似文献

1
Analysis of Behavior Classification in Motivational Interviewing.
Proc Conf. 2021 Jun;2021:110-115. doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.clpsych-1.13.
2
Multimodal Automatic Coding of Client Behavior in Motivational Interviewing.
Proc ACM Int Conf Multimodal Interact. 2020 Oct;2020:406-413. doi: 10.1145/3382507.3418853.
3
A sequential analysis of motivational interviewing technical skills and client responses.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Sep;92:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
6
A Comparison of Natural Language Processing Methods for Automated Coding of Motivational Interviewing.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Jun;65:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
7
Therapist influence on client language during motivational interviewing sessions.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006 Apr;30(3):245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2005.12.003.
8
Therapist and Client Interactions in Motivational Interviewing for Social Anxiety Disorder.
J Clin Psychol. 2017 Jul;73(7):829-847. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22405. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
9
Client and Therapist Views about Intensive and Standard Motivational Interviewing.
J Contemp Psychother. 2015 Sep;45(3):167-176. doi: 10.1007/s10879-014-9280-1.
10
Client language as a mediator of motivational interviewing efficacy: where is the evidence?
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Oct;31(10 Suppl):40s-47s. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00492.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Multimodal Automatic Coding of Client Behavior in Motivational Interviewing.
Proc ACM Int Conf Multimodal Interact. 2020 Oct;2020:406-413. doi: 10.1145/3382507.3418853.
3
A meta-analysis of motivational interviewing process: Technical, relational, and conditional process models of change.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Feb;86(2):140-157. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000250. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
5
In-session processes of brief motivational interventions in two trials with mandated college students.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Feb;83(1):56-67. doi: 10.1037/a0037635. Epub 2014 Aug 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验