Self-reported and actigraphic short sleep duration in older adults.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Persons > 65 years with short sleep duration (≤ 6 hours) are at risk for adverse outcomes, but the accuracy of self-reported sleep duration may be affected by reduced symptom awareness. We evaluated the performance characteristics of self-reported vs objectively measured sleep duration in this age group.

METHODS

In 2,980 men from the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Sleep Study and 2,855 women from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures we examined the agreement and accuracy of self-reported vs actigraphy-measured short and normal (> 6 but < 9 hours) sleep duration. We evaluated associations of select factors (demographics; medical, physical, and neuropsychiatric conditions; medication and substance use; and sleep-related measures) with risk of false-negative (normal sleep duration by self-report but short sleep duration by actigraphy) and false-positive (short sleep duration by self-report and normal sleep duration by actigraphy) designations, respectively, using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Average ages were 76.3 ± 5.5 and 83.5 ± 3.7 years in men and women, respectively. There was poor agreement between self-reported and actigraphic sleep duration (kappa ≤ 0.24). False negatives occurred in nearly half and false positives in over a quarter of older persons. In multivariable models in men and women, false negatives were independently associated with obesity, daytime sleepiness, and napping, while false positives were significantly lower with obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

Under- and overreporting of short sleep is common among older persons. Reliance on self-report may lead to missed opportunities to prevent adverse outcomes or unnecessary interventions. Self-reported sleep duration should be objectively confirmed when evaluating the effect of sleep duration on health outcomes.

CITATION

Miner B, Stone KL, Zeitzer JM, et al. Self-reported and actigraphic short sleep duration in older adults. . 2022;18(2):403-413.