Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Bellland General Hospital, 500-3, Higashiyama, Naka-ku, Sakai-shi, Osaka, 599-8247, Japan.
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Nov;26(11):2113-2122. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-02002-x. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of whole pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a simultaneous-integrated boost (WP-SIB-IMRT) for locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPCa).
All patients with cT3-4N0M0 prostate cancer treated with WP-SIB-IMRT between February 2006 and September 2009 at our institution were analyzed retrospectively. The prescribed dose was 78 Gy to the prostate and 58.5 Gy to the prophylactic pelvic lymph nodal area in 39 fractions delivered using the simultaneous-integrated boost technique. All patients received short-term neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy alone (median 8.3 months). Propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to evaluate the additional benefit of prophylactic whole pelvic radiation therapy (WPRT), using the cohort of 203 LAPCa patients treated with prostate-only IMRT (PO-IMRT).
In total, 47 consecutive patients were analyzed. The median estimated risk of pelvic lymph node involvement was 57.5%. The median follow-up period was 10.5 years. The 10 year prostate cancer-specific survival and biochemical failure (BF) rates were 92.2 and 54.8%, respectively. The 10 year cumulative incidence rates of ≥ grade 2 late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were 21.6 and 17.2%, respectively. From a total of 250 patients, PSM analysis identified 76 patients with similar characteristics, and no significant difference in BF rates was observed between WP-SIB-IMRT and PO-IMRT cohorts (p = 0.261).
WP-SIB-IMRT for LAPCa was safe over long-term observation, although no clear benefit of WPRT was observed among our small and highly selected cohort. Regarding the additional efficacy of WPRT, further investigations are needed.
本研究旨在评估局部晚期前列腺癌(LAPCa)行全盆腔调强放疗同步推量(WP-SIB-IMRT)的长期疗效和安全性。
回顾性分析 2006 年 2 月至 2009 年 9 月期间在我院接受 WP-SIB-IMRT 治疗的所有 cT3-4N0M0 前列腺癌患者。前列腺的处方剂量为 78Gy,预防性盆腔淋巴结区为 58.5Gy,采用同步推量技术分 39 次给予。所有患者均接受短期新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗(中位数 8.3 个月)。采用倾向性评分匹配(PSM)分析,对 203 例仅行前列腺调强放疗(PO-IMRT)的 LAPCa 患者队列进行评估,以确定预防性全盆腔放疗(WPRT)的额外获益。
共分析了 47 例连续患者。盆腔淋巴结受累的中位预估风险为 57.5%。中位随访时间为 10.5 年。10 年前列腺癌特异性生存率和生化失败率(BF)分别为 92.2%和 54.8%。≥2 级晚期泌尿生殖系统和胃肠道毒性的 10 年累积发生率分别为 21.6%和 17.2%。在总共 250 例患者中,PSM 分析确定了 76 例具有相似特征的患者,WP-SIB-IMRT 组和 PO-IMRT 组 BF 率无显著差异(p=0.261)。
LAPCa 行 WP-SIB-IMRT 治疗长期观察安全,但在我们选择的小队列中,并未观察到 WPRT 的明显获益。关于 WPRT 的额外疗效,需要进一步研究。