• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 治疗高度近视术后的光学质量比较:OQAS 和 iTrace 分析仪的一年回顾性研究。

Comparison of the optical quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK for high myopia by OQAS and iTrace analyzer: a one-year retrospective study.

机构信息

Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.

Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug 2;21(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02048-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12886-021-02048-5
PMID:34340669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8330115/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare the correction effect and optical quality after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for high myopia.

METHODS

51 high myopia eyes after SMILE and 49 high myopia eyes after FS-LASIK were enrolled and divided into two groups retrospectively. The OQAS and iTrace analyzer were used for optical quality inspection. Between the two groups the spherical equivalent (SE), astigmatism, uncorrected distant visual acuity (UDVA), strehl ratio (SR), modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (MTF cutoff), objective scatter index (OSI) and wavefront aberrations were analyzed and compared before surgery and at 1, 6 and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

After the operation: (1) SE and astigmatism declined and UDVA increased significantly in both groups, and UDVA was better after SMILE than FS-LASIK. (2) SR and MTF cutoff reduced and OSI increased significantly after SMILE and FS-LASIK. SR and MTF cutoff were significantly higher after SMILE than FS-LASIK. OSI was significantly lower after SMILE than FS-LASIK. (3) The total wavefront aberration, total low-order wavefront aberration, defocus and astigmatism aberration as well as trefoil aberration reduced significantly in both groups. The total high-order wavefront aberration increased significantly after FS-LASIK. The spherical and coma aberration increased significantly in both groups. The total high-order wavefront aberration and coma aberration at 1 month were higher after FS-LASIK than SMILE.

CONCLUSION

The optical quality descended after SMILE and FS-LASIK. SMILE was superior to FS-LASIK at the correction effect and optical quality for high myopia. The combination of OQAS and iTrace analyzer is a valuable complementary measurement in evaluating the optical quality after the refractive surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This is a retrospective study. This research was approved by the ethics committee of Xiangya Hospital and the IRB approval number is 201612074.

摘要

背景

比较小切口角膜基质透镜取出术(SMILE)和飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)治疗高度近视的矫正效果和光学生物质量。

方法

回顾性纳入 SMILE 术后 51 只眼和 FS-LASIK 术后 49 只眼的高度近视患者,分为两组。采用 OQAS 和 iTrace 分析仪进行光学质量检查。比较两组患者术前及术后 1、6、12 个月的等效球镜(SE)、散光、未矫正远视力(UDVA)、斯特列尔比(SR)、调制传递函数截止频率(MTF cutoff)、客观散射指数(OSI)和波前像差。

结果

术后:(1)两组 SE 和散光均下降,UDVA 均显著提高,SMILE 组优于 FS-LASIK 组。(2)SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 术后 SR 和 MTF cutoff 均显著降低,OSI 均显著升高,SMILE 组 SR 和 MTF cutoff 均显著高于 FS-LASIK 组,OSI 显著低于 FS-LASIK 组。(3)两组总波前像差、总低阶像差、离焦和散光像差以及彗差均显著降低,FS-LASIK 组总高阶像差显著增加。两组球差和彗差均显著增加,FS-LASIK 组术后 1 个月总高阶像差和彗差高于 SMILE 组。

结论

SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 术后光学生物质量下降。SMILE 在矫正效果和光学生物质量方面优于 FS-LASIK 治疗高度近视。OQAS 和 iTrace 分析仪的结合是评估屈光手术后光学生物质量的一种有价值的补充测量方法。

试验注册

这是一项回顾性研究。本研究经湘雅医院伦理委员会批准,注册号为 201612074。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3049/8330115/8f2cc062136c/12886_2021_2048_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3049/8330115/8f2cc062136c/12886_2021_2048_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3049/8330115/8f2cc062136c/12886_2021_2048_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the optical quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK for high myopia by OQAS and iTrace analyzer: a one-year retrospective study.SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 治疗高度近视术后的光学质量比较:OQAS 和 iTrace 分析仪的一年回顾性研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug 2;21(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02048-5.
2
Comparison of refractive outcomes and high-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for correcting high myopia and myopic astigmatism.小切口微透镜取出术与波前引导飞秒辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗高度近视及近视散光的屈光效果和高阶像差比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;40(12):3481-3489. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01534-x. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
3
Three-year outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism.小切口微透镜取出术(SMILE)和飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)治疗近视和近视散光的 3 年疗效。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;103(4):565-568. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312140. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
4
[Comparison of the visual quality at 1 year following femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK, wavefront-guided femtosecond LASIK and small incision lenticule extraction for myopia and astigmatism].[飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术、波前引导飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术和小切口基质透镜切除术治疗近视及散光后1年视觉质量的比较]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 11;56(2):118-125. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2020.02.007.
5
Aberration compensation between anterior and posterior corneal surfaces after Small incision lenticule extraction and Femtosecond laser-assisted laser in-situ keratomileusis.小切口透镜切除术和飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术后角膜前后表面像差补偿
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015 Sep;35(5):540-51. doi: 10.1111/opo.12226. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
6
Comparison of objective visual quality between SMILE and FS-LASIK in moderate-to-high myopia.SMILE与FS-LASIK治疗中高度近视的客观视觉质量比较。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 13;11:1408516. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1408516. eCollection 2024.
7
Comparison of efficacy and visual outcomes after SMILE and FS-LASIK for the correction of high myopia with the sum of myopia and astigmatism from -10.00 to -14.00 dioptres.SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 治疗等效球镜度数-10.00 至-14.00 度近视合并散光的疗效和视觉效果比较。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;98(2):e161-e172. doi: 10.1111/aos.14078. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
8
Comparison of ocular higher-order aberrations after SMILE and Wavefront-guided Femtosecond LASIK for myopia.全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)与波前引导飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视后眼高阶像差的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr 7;17(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0431-5.
9
Comparison of early visual outcomes after low-energy SMILE, high-energy SMILE, and LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism in the United States.美国低能量小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)、高能量SMILE及准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)治疗近视和近视散光后的早期视觉效果比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Jan 1;47(1):18-26. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000368.
10
Clinical Outcomes After SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术和飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视及近视散光的临床疗效:一项前瞻性随机对照研究
Cornea. 2016 Feb;35(2):210-6. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000707.

引用本文的文献

1
Corneal higher-order aberrations following small incision lenticule extraction for high myopic astigmatism correction.高度近视散光矫正的小切口透镜切除术术后角膜高阶像差
Int J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 18;18(7):1349-1356. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2025.07.19. eCollection 2025.
2
The impact of corneal epithelial remodeling on visual quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK for high myopia.全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)和飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)治疗高度近视后角膜上皮重塑对视觉质量的影响
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 5;25(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04168-8.
3
The Preservation and Reuse of Lenticules Extracted via Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE): A Narrative Review.

本文引用的文献

1
One-year visual outcomes and optical quality of femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction and Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL V4c) implantation for high myopia.飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术与 Visian 可植入式 Collamer 透镜(ICL V4c)植入术治疗高度近视的 1 年视觉效果和光学质量评估。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep;98(6):e662-e667. doi: 10.1111/aos.14344. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
2
Comparison of efficacy and visual outcomes after SMILE and FS-LASIK for the correction of high myopia with the sum of myopia and astigmatism from -10.00 to -14.00 dioptres.SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 治疗等效球镜度数-10.00 至-14.00 度近视合并散光的疗效和视觉效果比较。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;98(2):e161-e172. doi: 10.1111/aos.14078. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
3
经小切口飞秒透镜切除术(SMILE)取出的透镜的保存与再利用:一项叙述性综述
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Apr 3;12(4):380. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12040380.
4
Posterior lenticule laser scan influence the ultra-early postoperative visual acuity and quality of SMILE.后囊膜激光扫描对 SMILE 术后超早期视力和质量的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 7;14(1):27072. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78080-4.
5
Comparison of objective visual quality between SMILE and FS-LASIK in moderate-to-high myopia.SMILE与FS-LASIK治疗中高度近视的客观视觉质量比较。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 13;11:1408516. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1408516. eCollection 2024.
6
Changes in visual performance after implantation of different intraocular lenses.不同人工晶状体植入术后视觉性能的变化。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 18;17(7):1273-1282. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.07.12. eCollection 2024.
7
Effects of visual neuroplasticity training on visual perception, visual quality, and macular blood flow in patients with strabismus.视神经可塑性训练对斜视患者视觉感知、视觉质量和黄斑血流的影响。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Nov 1;72(Suppl 5):S776-S787. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2960_23. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
8
Differences in ocular high order aberrations before and after small incision lenticule extraction for correction of myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.小切口透镜切除术矫正近视前后眼高阶像差的差异:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 27;11:1274101. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1274101. eCollection 2024.
9
Comparative visual outcomes of the first versus second eye following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).SMILE 术后第一眼与第二眼的对比视觉效果。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 11;24(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03414-9.
10
Refractive outcomes of small lenticule extraction (SMILE) Pro® with a 2 MHz femtosecond laser.2MHz 飞秒激光小透镜提取(SMILE)Pro®的屈光效果。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 10;44(1):52. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-02915-2.
Visual Outcomes after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for High Myopia.高度近视的小切口微透镜取出术与飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 的视力结果。
Ophthalmic Res. 2020;63(4):427-433. doi: 10.1159/000504304. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
4
Future Developments in SMILE: Higher Degree of Myopia and Hyperopia.SMILE 技术的未来发展:更高程度的近视和远视。
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2019 Sep-Oct;8(5):412-416. doi: 10.1097/01.APO.0000580128.27272.bb.
5
Functional Optical Zone and Centration Following SMILE and LASIK: A Prospective, Randomized, Contralateral Eye Study.飞秒激光小切口基质透镜切除术和准分子原位角膜磨镶术后的功能性光学区和中心定位:一项前瞻性、随机、对侧眼研究。
J Refract Surg. 2019 Apr 1;35(4):230-237. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190313-01.
6
Longitudinal and Regional Non-uniform Remodeling of Corneal Epithelium After Topography-Guided FS-LASIK.地形引导的飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜上皮的纵向和区域非均匀重塑
J Refract Surg. 2019 Feb 1;35(2):88-95. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190104-01.
7
Comparison of visual quality after EVO-ICL implantation and SMILE to select the appropriate surgical method for high myopia.EVO-ICL植入术与全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术治疗高度近视术后视觉质量比较,以选择合适的手术方法
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb 8;19(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1029-x.
8
Comparison of effective optical zone after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.小切口微透镜取出术与飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视的有效光学区比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Oct;44(10):1179-1185. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.06.046.
9
Three-year outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism.小切口微透镜取出术(SMILE)和飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)治疗近视和近视散光的 3 年疗效。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;103(4):565-568. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312140. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
10
Preoperative refraction, age and optical zone as predictors of optical and visual quality after advanced surface ablation in patients with high myopia: a cross-sectional study.术前屈光度、年龄和光学区作为高度近视患者表面切削术后光学和视觉质量的预测因素:一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 4;8(6):e023877. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023877.