Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.
Division of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Piazza Malan 1, 20097, San Donato Milanese (Milano), Italy.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Jan;26(1):64-69. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05098-8. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
Symptom recurrence after initial surgical management of esophageal achalasia occurs in 10-25% of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze safety and efficacy of revisional therapy after failed Heller myotomy (HM).
A retrospective review of a prospective database was performed searching for patients with recurrent symptoms after primary surgical therapy for achalasia. Patients with previously failed HM were considered for the final analysis. The Foregut questionnaire, and the Atkinson and Eckardt scales were used to assess severity of symptoms. Objective investigations routinely included upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and barium swallow study. Redo treatments consisted of endoscopic pneumatic dilation (PD), laparoscopic HM, hybrid Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, or stapled cardioplasty. A yearly clinical and endoscopic follow-up was scheduled in all patients.
Over a 20-year period, 26 patients with a median age of 66 years (IQR 19.5) underwent revisional therapy after failed HM for achalasia at a tertiary-care university hospital. The median time after index procedure was 10 years (IQR 21). Revisional therapy consisted of endoscopic pneumatic dilation (n=13), laparoscopic HM and fundoplication (n=10), esophagectomy (n=2), and stapled cardioplasty and fundoplication (n=1). Nine (34.6%) of these patients required further endoscopic or surgical treatments. There was no mortality, and the overall complication rate was 7.7%. At a median follow-up of 42 months (range 10-149), a significant decrease of dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain, respiratory symptoms, and median Eckardt score (p<0.05) was noted.
In specialized and multidisciplinary centers, revisional therapy for achalasia is feasible, safe, and effective.
食管贲门失弛缓症初次手术治疗后症状复发的发生率为 10-25%。本研究旨在分析首次 Heller 肌切开术(HM)失败后的修正治疗的安全性和有效性。
对一个前瞻性数据库进行回顾性分析,寻找原发性贲门失弛缓症手术治疗后出现复发症状的患者。将先前 HM 失败的患者纳入最终分析。采用上消化道问卷、Atkinson 和 Eckardt 评分评估症状严重程度。常规的客观检查包括上消化道内镜检查和钡餐检查。修正治疗包括内镜下气囊扩张(PD)、腹腔镜 HM、杂交 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术或吻合器贲门成形术。所有患者均每年进行临床和内镜随访。
在 20 年期间,26 名中位年龄为 66 岁(IQR 19.5)的患者在三级保健大学医院因 HM 治疗失败后接受了贲门失弛缓症的修正治疗。指数手术后的中位时间为 10 年(IQR 21)。修正治疗包括内镜下气囊扩张(n=13)、腹腔镜 HM 和胃底折叠术(n=10)、食管切除术(n=2)和吻合器贲门成形术和胃底折叠术(n=1)。这些患者中有 9 例(34.6%)需要进一步的内镜或手术治疗。无死亡病例,总并发症发生率为 7.7%。中位随访时间为 42 个月(范围 10-149),发现吞咽困难、反流、胸痛、呼吸症状和 Eckardt 评分中位数显著降低(p<0.05)。
在专门的多学科中心,贲门失弛缓症的修正治疗是可行、安全和有效的。