Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 3;8(8):CD012924. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012924.pub2.
Children and adolescents diagnosed with cancer are at high risk of experiencing severe side effects from cancer treatment, many of which are amenable to physical therapy. These side effects can negatively impact a child's quality of life and ability to participate in daily activities (e.g. play and attendance at school). Researchers have evaluated physical therapy interventions in children with cancer and childhood cancer survivors. However, factors such as small sample sizes, varying intervention protocols and differences in cancer types among trials make it difficult to draw conclusions about efficacy.
The primary aim of this review was to evaluate the efficacy of physical therapy interventions - with a specific focus on symptom relief and compensation of therapy-related side effects - on the quality of life of children and adolescents diagnosed with cancer. Participants must be between the ages of 0 and 19 years at the time of the physical therapy intervention study. The intervention may occur prior to, during or following cancer treatment. The intervention must be compared to a control group of children receiving standard care, no physical therapy intervention or a comparison intervention. We have excluded general physical exercise studies where the primary aim was to improve physical fitness through aerobic, anaerobic, resistance exercise or combined physical exercise training regimens (i.e. combined aerobic and resistance exercise regimens). We have also intended to record the occurrence of any adverse effects resulting from physical therapy interventions. The secondary aims were to evaluate the efficacy of physical therapy on impairments of pain, peripheral neuropathy, balance, gait, functional abilities and mobility, motor function and performance, range of motion, strength and fatigue.
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PEDro, ongoing trial registries, conference proceedings and the reference lists of relevant studies and reviews in March 2020. We also contacted oncology rehabilitation researchers working in paediatrics in March 2020 to identify additional studies.
The review included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cross-over trials, and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) that compared the effects of physical therapy interventions to a control group, and involved children and adolescents diagnosed with cancer between the ages of 0 and 19 years at the time of the intervention. We excluded studies examining general physical exercise interventions where the primary aim was to improve physical fitness through aerobic exercise, resistance exercise or combined physical exercise training regimens (i.e. combined aerobic and resistance exercise regimens).
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.
We found no RCTs, cross-over trials or CCTs comparing the effects of physical therapy interventions with a focus on symptom relief and compensation of therapy-related side effects for children and adolescents between the ages of 0 and 19 years.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate that the evidence to date is inadequate to inform clinical practice. Recommendations for future research include the need for large-scale, high-quality designs that examine: (1) paediatric populations with same cancer types; (2) similar intervention protocols; (3) long-term outcomes; (4) physical therapy interventions (e.g. electrophysical modalities and sensory interventions); and (5) outcomes commonly impaired in children with cancer (e.g. peripheral neuropathy and gait deficits).
患有癌症的儿童和青少年有发生严重癌症治疗副作用的高风险,其中许多副作用可以通过物理治疗来缓解。这些副作用会对儿童的生活质量和参与日常活动(例如玩耍和上学)的能力产生负面影响。研究人员已经评估了癌症儿童和儿童癌症幸存者的物理治疗干预措施。然而,由于样本量小、干预方案不同以及试验中癌症类型的差异等因素,很难得出关于疗效的结论。
本综述的主要目的是评估物理治疗干预措施(特别关注症状缓解和治疗相关副作用的补偿)对诊断为癌症的儿童和青少年生活质量的疗效。参与者必须在接受物理治疗干预研究时年龄在 0 至 19 岁之间。干预可以在癌症治疗之前、期间或之后进行。干预必须与接受标准护理、无物理治疗干预或比较干预的儿童对照组进行比较。我们已经排除了主要目的是通过有氧运动、抗阻运动或结合物理运动训练方案(即结合有氧运动和抗阻运动方案)来提高身体健康的一般体育锻炼研究。我们还记录了物理治疗干预引起的任何不良反应的发生情况。次要目的是评估物理治疗对疼痛、周围神经病变、平衡、步态、功能能力和移动性、运动功能和表现、运动范围、力量和疲劳的影响。
我们于 2020 年 3 月在 CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、PEDro、正在进行的试验登记处、会议记录和相关研究和综述的参考文献中进行了检索。我们还于 2020 年 3 月联系了从事儿科肿瘤康复研究的肿瘤康复研究人员,以确定其他研究。
该综述包括随机对照试验(RCT)、交叉试验和对照临床试验(CCT),这些试验比较了物理治疗干预与对照组的效果,并涉及 0 至 19 岁接受干预的诊断为癌症的儿童和青少年。我们排除了主要目的是通过有氧运动、抗阻运动或结合物理运动训练方案(即结合有氧运动和抗阻运动方案)来提高身体健康的一般体育锻炼研究。
我们使用了 Cochrane 预期的标准方法学程序。
我们没有发现 RCT、交叉试验或 CCT,比较了 0 至 19 岁儿童和青少年的物理治疗干预措施对症状缓解和治疗相关副作用补偿的影响。
结果表明,迄今为止的证据不足以为临床实践提供依据。对未来研究的建议包括需要进行大规模、高质量的设计,研究以下内容:(1)具有相同癌症类型的儿科人群;(2)类似的干预方案;(3)长期结果;(4)物理治疗干预(例如电物理疗法和感觉干预);以及(5)儿童癌症中常见受损的结果(例如周围神经病变和步态缺陷)。