• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 CAR-T 治疗后时代,接受 ≥3 线治疗的复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的特征和治疗模式。

Characteristics and treatment patterns of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients receiving ≥3 therapy lines in post-CAR-T era.

机构信息

Analysis Group Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA.

ADC Therapeutics Inc., New Providence, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Oct;37(10):1789-1798. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1957806. Epub 2021 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1080/03007995.2021.1957806
PMID:34344238
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Several novel treatments have been approved for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) since chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy became available. The objective of this study was to describe characteristics and treatment patterns in patients with R/R DLBCL post-CAR-T approval.

METHODS

Adult patients with R/R DLBCL who initiated third-line treatment or later (3 L+) since 18 October 2017 were identified using administrative claims from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus (1 January 2014-31 March 2020). Treatments were categorized as chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy (CT/CIT), targeted therapies, CAR-T and stem cell transplant (SCT). Treatment distribution, treatment duration of CT/CIT and targeted therapies, and initiation of next-line therapy were described for patients receiving 3 L; analyses were repeated for 4 L.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients received 3 L between 18 October 2017 and 31 March 2020. Mean age was 57 years, and 34% were female. CT/CIT (44.9%), targeted therapies (26.9%), CAR-T (17.2%) and SCT (11.0%) were administered in 3 L. The median treatment duration was 2.9 months for CT/CIT and targeted therapies combined. 31% of patients initiated 4 L within a median follow-up of 5.8 months. Among patients who received 4 L ( = 55), targeted therapies were most commonly used (36.4%), and the median treatment duration was 2.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-CAR-T approval, the majority of patients were treated with CT/CIT or targeted therapies in 3 L and 4 L, though most of the targeted therapies prescribed are not indicated for DLBCL. Treatment duration was short. A high proportion of patients moved to the next line of therapy (LOT) during a short follow-up period. This study highlights the unmet need for more effective treatments for patients with R/R DLBCL in 3 L+.

摘要

目的

嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞(CAR-T)疗法问世以来,已有多种新型疗法获批用于治疗复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(R/R DLBCL)。本研究旨在描述 CAR-T 获批后 R/R DLBCL 患者的特征和治疗模式。

方法

使用 IQVIA PharMetrics Plus 的行政索赔数据(2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 31 日),确定自 2017 年 10 月 18 日起接受三线或以上治疗(3L+)的 R/R DLBCL 成年患者。治疗分为化疗/化疗免疫治疗(CT/CIT)、靶向治疗、CAR-T 和干细胞移植(SCT)。描述了接受 3L 的患者的治疗分布、CT/CIT 和靶向治疗的治疗持续时间以及下一线治疗的开始情况;对 4L 进行了重复分析。

结果

共有 145 名患者在 2017 年 10 月 18 日至 2020 年 3 月 31 日期间接受了 3L 治疗。平均年龄为 57 岁,34%为女性。3L 中采用 CT/CIT(44.9%)、靶向治疗(26.9%)、CAR-T(17.2%)和 SCT(11.0%)。CT/CIT 和靶向治疗联合的中位治疗持续时间为 2.9 个月。中位随访 5.8 个月时,31%的患者开始 4L 治疗。在接受 4L(n=55)的患者中,靶向治疗最常用(36.4%),中位治疗持续时间为 2.5 个月。

结论

CAR-T 获批后,大多数患者在 3L 和 4L 中接受 CT/CIT 或靶向治疗,但大多数开具的靶向治疗并非针对 DLBCL。治疗持续时间较短。在短时间的随访期间,相当大比例的患者进入下一治疗线(LOT)。本研究强调了 R/R DLBCL 患者在 3L+中需要更有效的治疗。

相似文献

1
Characteristics and treatment patterns of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients receiving ≥3 therapy lines in post-CAR-T era.在 CAR-T 治疗后时代,接受 ≥3 线治疗的复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的特征和治疗模式。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Oct;37(10):1789-1798. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1957806. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
2
Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Who Received At Least 3 Lines of Therapies.至少接受 3 线治疗的复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的特征和临床结局。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Jun;22(6):373-381. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.11.011. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
3
Overcoming Barriers to Referral for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.克服复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者接受嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗的转诊障碍。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Jul;29(7):440-448. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.04.003. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
4
Comparative effectiveness of salvage chemotherapy regimens and chimeric antigen T-cell receptor therapies in relapsed and refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma: a network meta-analysis of clinical trials.挽救性化疗方案与嵌合抗原 T 细胞受体疗法在复发难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤中的比较疗效:一项临床试验的网状荟萃分析
Leuk Lymphoma. 2023 Oct;64(10):1643-1654. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2023.2234528. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
5
[Polatuzumab vedotin, bendamustine, and rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, including the outcome as a bridging treatment to CAR-T cell therapy or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant].泊洛妥珠单抗、苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗用于复发/难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,包括作为CAR-T细胞疗法或异基因造血干细胞移植的桥接治疗的结果
Rinsho Ketsueki. 2023;64(7):586-595. doi: 10.11406/rinketsu.64.586.
6
Treatment Outcomes with Standard of Care in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Real-World Data Analysis.标准治疗下复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的治疗结果:真实世界数据分析。
Adv Ther. 2024 Mar;41(3):1226-1244. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02775-9. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
7
Comparisons of treatment outcomes of epcoritamab versus chemoimmunotherapy, polatuzumab-based regimens, tafasitamab-based regimens, or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, in third-line or later relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma.在三线或三线以上复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤中,比较 epcoritamab 与化疗免疫治疗、基于 polatuzumab 的方案、基于 tafasitamab 的方案或嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗的治疗结局。
J Hematol Oncol. 2024 Aug 16;17(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13045-024-01594-x.
8
Real-World Treatment Patterns After CD19-Directed CAR T Cell Therapy Among Patients with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者接受 CD19 导向嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗后的真实世界治疗模式。
Adv Ther. 2022 Jun;39(6):2630-2640. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02087-4. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
9
RE-MIND2: comparative effectiveness of tafasitamab plus lenalidomide versus polatuzumab vedotin/bendamustine/rituximab (pola-BR), CAR-T therapies, and lenalidomide/rituximab (R2) based on real-world data in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.RE-MIND2:基于真实世界数据在复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者中,比较 tafasitamab 联合来那度胺与 polatuzumab vedotin/苯达莫司汀/利妥昔单抗(pola-BR)、嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法以及来那度胺/利妥昔单抗(R2)的疗效。
Ann Hematol. 2023 Jul;102(7):1773-1787. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05196-4. Epub 2023 May 12.
10
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Access in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Association of Access with Social Determinants of Health and Travel Time to Treatment Centers.嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞输注治疗复发/难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者:输注机会与健康的社会决定因素和前往治疗中心的交通时间的关联。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 Jul;30(7):714-725. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.04.017. Epub 2024 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Loncastuximab Tesirine Versus Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory DLBCL After ≥ 2 Lines of Therapy: Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.在接受≥2线治疗后的复发/难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤中,loncastuximab tesirine与泊洛妥珠单抗联合苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗的疗效对比:匹配调整间接比较
Adv Ther. 2025 May;42(5):2445-2464. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03169-9. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
2
Loncastuximab tesirine in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: long-term efficacy and safety from the phase II LOTIS-2 study.Loncastuximab tesirine 治疗复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤:来自 II 期 LOTIS-2 研究的长期疗效和安全性。
Haematologica. 2024 Apr 1;109(4):1184-1193. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2023.283459.
3
Long-Term Host Immune Modulation Following Tisagenlecleucel Administration in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and B-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.替沙格韦单抗治疗弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤和B系急性淋巴细胞白血病患者后的长期宿主免疫调节
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 22;15(9):2411. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092411.