• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

至少接受 3 线治疗的复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的特征和临床结局。

Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Who Received At Least 3 Lines of Therapies.

机构信息

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.

ADC Therapeutics, New Providence, NJ.

出版信息

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Jun;22(6):373-381. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.11.011. Epub 2021 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.clml.2021.11.011
PMID:34933826
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The treatment landscape for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has recently changed. We examined characteristics and clinical outcomes of DLBCL patients who initiated a third (3L) and fourth (4L) line of therapy during a contemporary time frame.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients diagnosed with DLBCL who received ≥ 3L after January 1, 2014 were selected from the COTA database. Patients were grouped into cohorts by 3L or 4L initiation and further stratified by type of treatment received: chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy (CT/CIT), targeted therapy (TT), chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T), or salvage therapy consolidated with hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Patient characteristics, response rates, and overall survival (OS) were examined.

RESULTS

Among adult patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) DLBCL, 212 (mean age; 61.8 years; 59.0% male) received their 3L and 127 (mean age: 61.0 years; 61.4% male) their 4L. Among those treated with their 3L and 4L, 55.2% and 50.4%, respectively, received CT/CIT; 26.9% and 34.6% received TT. The complete response rate of 3L patients was 9.4% for CT/CIT, 10.5% for TT, and 60% for CAR-T. Similar findings were seen with 4L patients (CT/CIT: 6.3%; TT: 15.9%; CAR-T: 53.8%). For those who received pharmacological treatment in 3L and 4L, median OS times were 7.7 and 4.4 months, respectively. Median OS times of patients who received cell-based therapies (CAR-T/HCT) were not reached.

CONCLUSION

In this study, a majority of r/r DLBCL patients were treated with CT/CIT or TT in 3L and 4L settings and had poor clinical outcomes, underscoring the need for more effective treatments.

摘要

简介

弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的治疗格局最近发生了变化。我们研究了在当代时间框架内开始接受三线(3L)和四线(4L)治疗的 DLBCL 患者的特征和临床结局。

材料和方法

从 COTA 数据库中选择了 2014 年 1 月 1 日以后诊断为 DLBCL 并接受了≥3L 治疗的成年患者。患者按 3L 或 4L 起始分组,并进一步按接受的治疗类型分层:化疗或化疗免疫治疗(CT/CIT)、靶向治疗(TT)、嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞(CAR-T)或挽救性治疗联合造血细胞移植(HCT)。检查了患者特征、反应率和总生存率(OS)。

结果

在复发/难治性(r/r)DLBCL 成年患者中,212 例(平均年龄 61.8 岁;59.0%为男性)接受了 3L 治疗,127 例(平均年龄 61.0 岁;61.4%为男性)接受了 4L 治疗。在接受 3L 和 4L 治疗的患者中,分别有 55.2%和 50.4%接受了 CT/CIT;分别有 26.9%和 34.6%接受了 TT。3L 患者 CT/CIT 的完全缓解率为 9.4%,TT 为 10.5%,CAR-T 为 60%。4L 患者也观察到类似的发现(CT/CIT:6.3%;TT:15.9%;CAR-T:53.8%)。对于那些在 3L 和 4L 接受药物治疗的患者,中位 OS 时间分别为 7.7 个月和 4.4 个月。接受细胞治疗(CAR-T/HCT)的患者中位 OS 时间未达到。

结论

在这项研究中,大多数 r/r DLBCL 患者在 3L 和 4L 治疗中接受了 CT/CIT 或 TT 治疗,临床结局较差,这突出表明需要更有效的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Who Received At Least 3 Lines of Therapies.至少接受 3 线治疗的复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的特征和临床结局。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Jun;22(6):373-381. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.11.011. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
2
Characteristics and treatment patterns of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients receiving ≥3 therapy lines in post-CAR-T era.在 CAR-T 治疗后时代,接受 ≥3 线治疗的复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的特征和治疗模式。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Oct;37(10):1789-1798. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1957806. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
3
Early failure is still a poor prognostic factor in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in the era of CAR T-cell therapy.在 CAR T 细胞治疗时代,复发或难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的早期失败仍然是预后不良的因素。
J Clin Exp Hematop. 2024;64(2):107-118. doi: 10.3960/jslrt.24009.
4
Patterns of Utilization and Outcomes of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 Rearrangements.在 MYC、BCL2 和/或 BCL6 重排的复发或难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤中,自体干细胞移植和嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗的利用模式和结局。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Nov;22(11):825-834. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.06.011. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
5
Real-world patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and treatment outcomes of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by line of therapy.按治疗线评估弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的真实世界患者特征、治疗模式和治疗结局。
Cancer Med. 2024 Apr;13(7):e7173. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7173.
6
Immunotherapies Old and New: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant, Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells, and Bispecific Antibodies for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.新旧免疫疗法:造血干细胞移植、嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞和双特异性抗体治疗复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤。
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2021 Feb;16(1):72-81. doi: 10.1007/s11899-021-00610-y. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
7
ASTCT Clinical Practice Recommendations for Transplantation and Cellular Therapies in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.ASCTCT 弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤移植和细胞治疗临床实践建议
Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Sep;29(9):548-555. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.06.012. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
8
Comparisons of treatment outcomes of epcoritamab versus chemoimmunotherapy, polatuzumab-based regimens, tafasitamab-based regimens, or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, in third-line or later relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma.在三线或三线以上复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤中,比较 epcoritamab 与化疗免疫治疗、基于 polatuzumab 的方案、基于 tafasitamab 的方案或嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗的治疗结局。
J Hematol Oncol. 2024 Aug 16;17(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13045-024-01594-x.
9
Efficacy of Salvage Treatments in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Including Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.挽救治疗在复发或难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤中的疗效,包括嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jul;55(3):1031-1047. doi: 10.4143/crt.2022.1658. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
10
[Polatuzumab vedotin, bendamustine, and rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, including the outcome as a bridging treatment to CAR-T cell therapy or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant].泊洛妥珠单抗、苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗用于复发/难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,包括作为CAR-T细胞疗法或异基因造血干细胞移植的桥接治疗的结果
Rinsho Ketsueki. 2023;64(7):586-595. doi: 10.11406/rinketsu.64.586.

引用本文的文献

1
Loncastuximab Tesirine Versus Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory DLBCL After ≥ 2 Lines of Therapy: Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.在接受≥2线治疗后的复发/难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤中,loncastuximab tesirine与泊洛妥珠单抗联合苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗的疗效对比:匹配调整间接比较
Adv Ther. 2025 May;42(5):2445-2464. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03169-9. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
2
Treatment Outcomes with Standard of Care in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Real-World Data Analysis.标准治疗下复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的治疗结果:真实世界数据分析。
Adv Ther. 2024 Mar;41(3):1226-1244. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02775-9. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
3
Subcutaneous epcoritamab monotherapy in Japanese adults with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
皮下注射依基奥仑赛单药治疗复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的日本成年患者。
Cancer Sci. 2023 Dec;114(12):4643-4653. doi: 10.1111/cas.15996. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
4
Tafasitamab and lenalidomide in large B-cell lymphoma: real-world outcomes in a multicenter retrospective study.塔法西他单抗联合来那度胺治疗大 B 细胞淋巴瘤:多中心回顾性研究的真实世界结局。
Blood. 2023 Dec 28;142(26):2327-2331. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023021274.
5
Loncastuximab tesirine in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: long-term efficacy and safety from the phase II LOTIS-2 study.Loncastuximab tesirine 治疗复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤:来自 II 期 LOTIS-2 研究的长期疗效和安全性。
Haematologica. 2024 Apr 1;109(4):1184-1193. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2023.283459.