• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意性 SNARC 效应真的是注意性的吗?使用时间顺序判断来区分注意和反应。

Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 May;75(5):808-817. doi: 10.1177/17470218211039479. Epub 2021 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1177/17470218211039479
PMID:34344248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8958638/
Abstract

The spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect reflects the phenomenon that low digits are responded to faster with the left hand and high digits with the right. Recently, a particular variant of the SNARC effect known as the attentional SNARC (which reflects that attention can be shifted in a similar manner) has had notable replicability issues. However, a potentially useful method for measuring it was revealed by Casarotti et al. using a temporal order judgement (TOJ) task. Accordingly, the present study evaluated whether Casarotti et al.'s results were reproducible by presenting a low (1) or high (9) digit prior to a TOJ task where participants had to indicate which of two peripherally presented targets appeared first (Experiment 1) or second (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, it was revealed that the findings of Casarotti et al.'s were indeed observable upon replication. In Experiment 2, when attention and response dimensions were put in opposition, the SNARC effect corresponded to the side of response rather than attention. Taken together, the present study confirms the robustness of the attentional SNARC in TOJ tasks, but that it is not likely due to shifts in attention.

摘要

数字-空间反应编码关联(SNARC)效应反映了这样一种现象,即低位数用左手反应更快,而高位数用右手反应更快。最近,一种被称为注意性 SNARC(反映了注意力可以以类似的方式转移)的特殊 SNARC 效应变体,其可重复性问题显著。然而,卡萨罗蒂等人使用时间顺序判断(TOJ)任务揭示了一种测量注意力性 SNARC 的有用方法。因此,本研究通过在 TOJ 任务之前呈现一个低(1)或高(9)数字,评估了卡萨罗蒂等人的结果是否具有可重复性,在该任务中,参与者必须指出两个外周呈现的目标中哪一个先出现(实验 1)或第二个(实验 2)。在实验 1 中,研究结果表明,卡萨罗蒂等人的发现确实可以在复制后观察到。在实验 2 中,当注意力和反应维度相对立时,SNARC 效应与反应而不是注意力的方向相对应。综上所述,本研究证实了在 TOJ 任务中注意性 SNARC 的稳健性,但它不太可能是由于注意力的转移所致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59e4/8958638/bdf0dde8c0c4/10.1177_17470218211039479-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59e4/8958638/959c72cd8adb/10.1177_17470218211039479-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59e4/8958638/b5b2336be72d/10.1177_17470218211039479-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59e4/8958638/bdf0dde8c0c4/10.1177_17470218211039479-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59e4/8958638/959c72cd8adb/10.1177_17470218211039479-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59e4/8958638/b5b2336be72d/10.1177_17470218211039479-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59e4/8958638/bdf0dde8c0c4/10.1177_17470218211039479-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response.注意性 SNARC 效应真的是注意性的吗?使用时间顺序判断来区分注意和反应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 May;75(5):808-817. doi: 10.1177/17470218211039479. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
2
On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.关于健康人类数字表征与空间注意力交互作用的不稳定性和制约因素:文献综述及新实验证据简述
Prog Brain Res. 2016;227:223-56. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.04.023. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
3
No conclusive evidence for number-induced attentional shifts in a temporal order judgement task.在时间顺序判断任务中,没有确凿证据表明数字会引起注意力转移。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Nov;76(11):2570-2578. doi: 10.1177/17470218231152406. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
4
Development of number-space associations: SNARC effects and spatial attention in 7- to 11-year-olds.数-空间联系的发展:7 至 11 岁儿童的 SNARC 效应与空间注意。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 12;14(3):e0212204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212204. eCollection 2019.
5
Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.极性对应上的好坏约束解释了反应编码的空间-数字关联效应(SNARC)和反应编码的标记性关联效应(MARC)。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(3):482-94. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1055283. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
6
It's SNARC o' clock: manipulating the salience of the context in a conceptual replication of Bächtold et al.'s (1998) clockface study.现在是 SNARC 时间:在 Bächtold 等人(1998 年)的钟面研究的概念复制中,操纵上下文的突显。
Psychol Res. 2024 Apr;88(3):837-851. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01893-x. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
7
The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect?空间数字反应编码联合效应:西蒙效应的一个实例?
Cognition. 2003 Jul;88(3):B1-10. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00042-8.
8
Automaticity of access to numerical magnitude and its spatial associations: The role of task and number representation.获取数字大小及其空间关联的自动性:任务与数字表征的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Feb;45(2):333-348. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000590. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
9
Automaticity in processing spatial-numerical associations: Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task of Arabic digits in frames.数字在框架中呈现时的知觉方位判断任务:来自空间-数字自动关联加工的证据
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 24;15(2):e0229130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229130. eCollection 2020.
10
Implicit response-irrelevant number information triggers the SNARC effect: evidence using a neural overlap paradigm.内隐的与反应无关的数字信息引发空间数字反应编码联合效应:基于神经重叠范式的证据
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(10):1945-61. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.673631. Epub 2012 Apr 23.

本文引用的文献

1
How to trigger and keep stable directional Space-Number Associations (SNAs).如何触发并保持稳定的定向空间-数字关联(SNA)。
Cortex. 2021 Jan;134:253-264. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.10.020. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
2
Does Number Perception Cause Automatic Shifts of Spatial Attention? A Study of the Att-SNARC Effect in Numbers and Chinese Months.数字感知会引发空间注意力的自动转移吗?一项关于数字和中国月份的注意-空间数字反应编码联合效应的研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 May 12;11:680. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00680. eCollection 2020.
3
The representational basis of positive and negative repetition effects.
正、负重复效应的表象基础。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Mar;46(3):252-263. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000713. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
4
The Attentional-SNARC effect 16 years later: no automatic space-number association (taking into account finger counting style, imagery vividness, and learning style in 174 participants).16 年后的注意- SNARC 效应:在 174 名参与者中,没有自动的空间-数字联想(考虑到手指计数方式、意象生动度和学习方式)。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Oct;237(10):2633-2643. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05617-9. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
5
Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.用于反应选择的左右编码对比不一定必须与数字特征对比相关联才能产生SNARC效应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jul;198:102887. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102887. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
6
Testing the role of response repetition in spatial priming in visual search.测试反应重复在视觉搜索的空间启动中的作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Aug;80(6):1362-1374. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1550-7.
7
Deconstructing spatial-numerical associations.解构空间-数字关联。
Cognition. 2018 Jun;175:109-113. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.022. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
8
Visualising numerals: An ERPs study with the attentional SNARC task.视数量:带注意 SNARC 任务的 ERP 研究。
Cortex. 2018 Apr;101:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.12.015. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
9
Implicit spatial-numerical associations: Negative numbers and the role of counting direction.内隐空间-数字关联:负数与计数方向的作用
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Apr;43(4):639-643. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000369.
10
How Does Working Memory Enable Number-Induced Spatial Biases?工作记忆如何引发数字诱导的空间偏差?
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 29;7:977. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00977. eCollection 2016.