Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Western Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Nov;157:485-492. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
Bone metastases occur frequently in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and may lead to skeletal-related events (SREs), including symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs). Bone-modifying agents (BMAs) delay SREs and SSEs. However, the real-world use of BMAs is debated given the absence of demonstrated survival advantage and potential adverse events (AEs). Our retrospective study examined BMA use and SSE rates in Australian patients with CRPC.
Patients with CRPC and bone metastases were identified from the electronic CRPC Australian Database. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns and AEs were analysed. Descriptive statistics reported baseline characteristics, SSE rates and BMA use. Comparisons between groups used t-tests and Chi-square analyses. Overall survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
A total of 532 eligible patients were identified with a median age of 73 years (range: 44-97 years). BMAs were prescribed in 232 men (46%), 183 of whom received denosumab. Patients receiving first-line docetaxel for CRPC were more likely to commence BMAs than those receiving abiraterone or enzalutamide (51% vs 31% vs 38%; p = 0.004). SSEs occurred in 148 men (28%), most commonly symptomatic lesions requiring intervention (75%). At the time of initial SSEs, only 28% were receiving BMAs. Patients treated at sites with lower BMA use (<median) had higher SSE rates (32% vs 22%, p = 0.019).
In our real-world cohort, SSEs occurred in almost one-third of patients with CRPC and bone metastases, whereas less than half of patients received BMAs. The lower rate of SSEs in treatment sites with increased BMA use supports their benefit in this setting.
去势抵抗性前列腺癌(CRPC)常发生骨转移,并可能导致骨骼相关事件(SREs),包括有症状的骨骼事件(SSEs)。骨修饰剂(BMAs)可延迟 SREs 和 SSEs。然而,由于缺乏生存优势和潜在不良反应(AEs)的证据,BMAs 的实际应用存在争议。我们的回顾性研究调查了澳大利亚 CRPC 患者中 BMA 的使用情况和 SSE 发生率。
从电子澳大利亚 CRPC 数据库中确定了患有 CRPC 和骨转移的患者。分析了患者的特征、治疗模式和 AEs。描述性统计报告了基线特征、SSE 发生率和 BMA 的使用情况。使用 t 检验和卡方分析比较组间差异。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法计算总生存率。
共确定了 532 名符合条件的患者,中位年龄为 73 岁(范围:44-97 岁)。232 名男性(46%)开具了 BMA,其中 183 名接受了地舒单抗。接受一线多西他赛治疗 CRPC 的患者比接受阿比特龙或恩扎卢胺的患者更有可能开始使用 BMA(51%比 31%比 38%;p=0.004)。148 名男性(28%)发生了 SSEs,最常见的是需要干预的有症状病变(75%)。在首次发生 SSEs 时,只有 28%的患者正在接受 BMA 治疗。在 BMA 使用量较低(<中位数)的治疗部位的患者,SSE 发生率更高(32%比 22%,p=0.019)。
在我们的真实世界队列中,近三分之一的 CRPC 和骨转移患者发生了 SSEs,而不到一半的患者接受了 BMA 治疗。在 BMA 使用量较高的治疗部位,SSE 发生率较低,支持其在该环境下的获益。