文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

达雷妥尤单抗联合硼替佐米、美法仑和泼尼松与硼替佐米、美法仑和泼尼松在不适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤中的应用:ALCYONE 研究体弱亚组分析。

Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone Versus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone in Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Frailty Subgroup Analysis of ALCYONE.

机构信息

University Hospital of Salamanca/IBSAL, Cancer Research Center IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), Salamanca, Spain.

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 Nov;21(11):785-798. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jun 18.


DOI:10.1016/j.clml.2021.06.005
PMID:34344638
Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the phase 3 ALCYONE study, daratumumab plus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (D-VMP) versus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (VMP) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in transplant-ineligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. We present a subgroup analysis of ALCYONE by patient frailty status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Frailty assessment was performed retrospectively using age, Charlson comorbidity index, and baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score. Patients were classified as fit (0), intermediate (1), or frail (≥2); a nonfrail category combined fit and intermediate patients. RESULTS: Among randomized patients (D-VMP, n = 350; VMP, n = 356), 391 (55.4%) were nonfrail (D-VMP, 187 [53.4%]; VMP, 204 [57.3%]) and 315 (44.6%) were frail (163 [46.6%]; 152 [42.7%]). After 40.1-months median follow-up, nonfrail patients had longer PFS and OS than frail patients, but benefits of D-VMP versus VMP were maintained across subgroups: PFS nonfrail (median, 45.7 vs. 19.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; P < .0001), frail (32.9 vs. 19.5 months; HR, 0.51; P < .0001); OS nonfrail (36-month rate, 83.6% vs. 74.5%), frail (71.4% vs. 59.0%). Improved greater than or equal to complete response and minimal residual disease (10)-negativity rates were observed for D-VMP versus VMP across subgroups. The 2 most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (nonfrail: 39.2% [D-VMP] and 42.4% [VMP]; frail: 41.3% and 34.4%) and thrombocytopenia (nonfrail: 32.8% and 36.9%; frail: 36.9% and 39.1%). CONCLUSION: Our findings support the clinical benefit of D-VMP in transplant-ineligible NDMM patients enrolled in ALCYONE, regardless of frailty status.

摘要

背景:在 3 期 ALCYONE 研究中,与硼替佐米/马法兰/泼尼松(VMP)相比,达雷妥尤单抗联合硼替佐米/马法兰/泼尼松(D-VMP)显著改善了不适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。我们根据患者虚弱状态对 ALCYONE 进行了亚组分析。

患者和方法:采用年龄、Charlson 合并症指数和基线东部肿瘤协作组体力状况评分进行回顾性虚弱评估。患者分为健康(0 分)、中度(1 分)或虚弱(≥2 分);非虚弱类别结合了健康和中度患者。

结果:在随机分组患者中(D-VMP 组 350 例,VMP 组 356 例),391 例(55.4%)为非虚弱患者(D-VMP 组 187 例[53.4%];VMP 组 204 例[57.3%]),315 例(44.6%)为虚弱患者(D-VMP 组 163 例[46.6%];VMP 组 152 例[42.7%])。中位随访 40.1 个月后,非虚弱患者的 PFS 和 OS 长于虚弱患者,但 D-VMP 与 VMP 相比的获益在各亚组中得以维持:PFS 非虚弱(中位值,45.7 与 19.1 个月;风险比[HR],0.36;P<.0001),虚弱(32.9 与 19.5 个月;HR,0.51;P<.0001);OS 非虚弱(36 个月率,83.6%与 74.5%),虚弱(71.4%与 59.0%)。与 VMP 相比,D-VMP 可改善各亚组患者的完全缓解和微小残留疾病(MRD)-10 阴性率。与 VMP 相比,最常见的 3/4 级治疗相关不良事件为中性粒细胞减少症(非虚弱:39.2%[D-VMP]和 42.4%[VMP];虚弱:41.3%和 34.4%)和血小板减少症(非虚弱:32.8%和 36.9%;虚弱:36.9%和 39.1%)。

结论:无论虚弱状态如何,我们的研究结果均支持 D-VMP 在 ALCYONE 中入组的不适合移植的 NDMM 患者中的临床获益。

相似文献

[1]
Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone Versus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone in Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Frailty Subgroup Analysis of ALCYONE.

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021-11

[2]
Comparative Efficacy of Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone (VMP) With or Without Daratumumab Versus VMP Alone in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Propensity Score Matching of ALCYONE and VISTA Phase III Studies.

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020-7

[3]
Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone Versus Standard of Care in Latin America for Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Adv Ther. 2020-12

[4]
Overall survival with daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (ALCYONE): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Lancet. 2019-12-10

[5]
Daratumumab plus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone in East Asian patients with non-transplant multiple myeloma: subanalysis of the randomized phase 3 ALCYONE trial.

Ann Hematol. 2019-10-16

[6]
Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone With or Without Daratumumab in Transplant-ineligible Asian Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: The Phase 3 OCTANS Study.

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023-6

[7]
Sustained minimal residual disease negativity in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and the impact of daratumumab in MAIA and ALCYONE.

Blood. 2022-1-27

[8]
Daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone versus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone alone in transplant-ineligible Asian patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the phase 3 OCTANS Study.

Ann Hematol. 2025-1

[9]
Carfilzomib or bortezomib with melphalan-prednisone for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Blood. 2019-2-28

[10]
A matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (MAIC) of daratumumab-bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (D-VMP) versus lenalidomide-dexamethasone continuous (Rd continuous), lenalidomide-dexamethasone 18 months (Rd 18), and melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide (MPT).

Leuk Lymphoma. 2020-3

引用本文的文献

[1]
Outcomes in frail patients receiving BCMA-directed bispecific antibodies for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Blood Adv. 2025-8-12

[2]
Challenges in Multiple Myeloma Therapy in Older and Frail Patients.

Cancers (Basel). 2025-3-11

[3]
Isatuximab plus bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a frailty subgroup analysis of the IMROZ trial.

Haematologica. 2025-9-1

[4]
How First-Line Therapy is Changing in non-Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2025-3-1

[5]
Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in frail individuals with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in Japan.

Int J Hematol. 2025-4

[6]
Dynamic frailty-tailored therapy (DynaFiT): A proof-of-concept study in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Blood Sci. 2024-10-1

[7]
Feasibility and Outcome of First-Line Autotransplant-Based Treatment in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Aged > 65 Years: Monocentric Retrospective Real-World Analysis.

Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2024-9-1

[8]
Daratumumab in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of clinically relevant subgroups in GRIFFIN.

Blood Cancer J. 2024-7-8

[9]
Assessing frailty in myeloma: The pursuit of simplicity may sacrifice precision of predicting clinical outcomes.

Hemasphere. 2024-7-4

[10]
Individualized dynamic frailty-tailored therapy (DynaFiT) in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a prospective study.

J Hematol Oncol. 2024-6-24

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索