• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卡非佐米或硼替佐米联合马法兰-泼尼松用于不适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者。

Carfilzomib or bortezomib with melphalan-prednisone for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

机构信息

CHRU Lille Hôpital Claude Huriez, Lille, France.

Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Seongnam-si, Korea.

出版信息

Blood. 2019 May 2;133(18):1953-1963. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-09-874396. Epub 2019 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1182/blood-2018-09-874396
PMID:30819926
Abstract

The phase 3 CLARION study compared carfilzomib-melphalan-prednisone (KMP) with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. Patients were randomized 1:1 to KMP or VMP for nine 42-day cycles (C). Patients received carfilzomib on days (D) 1, 2, 8, 9, 22, 23, 29, 30 (20 mg/m: C1D1, C1D2; 36 mg/m thereafter) or bortezomib on D1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29, 32 (1.3 mg/m; D4, 11, 25, 32 omitted for C5-9). Melphalan (9 mg/m) and prednisone (60 mg/m) were administered on D1-4. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Nine hundred fifty-five patients were randomized (intention-to-treat population: KMP, n = 478; VMP, n = 477). Median PFS was 22.3 months with KMP vs 22.1 months with VMP (hazard ratio [HR], 0.906; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.746-1.101; = .159). Median overall survival was similar and not reached in either group (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.82-1.43). Overall response rate was 84.3% for KMP and 78.8% for VMP. Complete response rate was 25.9% for KMP and 23.1% for VMP. Minimal residual disease-negative rates were 15.7% (KMP) and 15.5% (VMP). Adverse events (AEs) of interest (any grade) occurring with a ≥5% higher patient incidence in the KMP arm were acute renal failure (13.9% [KMP] vs 6.2% [VMP]) and cardiac failure (10.8% vs 4.3%). Grade ≥3 AE rates were 74.7% (KMP) and 76.2% (VMP). Grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy was lower for KMP vs VMP (2.5% vs 35.1%). Treatment with KMP in CLARION did not yield a statistically significant difference in PFS vs VMP. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01818752.

摘要

CLARION 研究的第 3 阶段比较了卡非佐米-马法兰-泼尼松(KMP)与硼替佐米-马法兰-泼尼松(VMP)在不适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者中的疗效。患者按 1:1 随机分配至 KMP 或 VMP 组,接受 9 个 42 天周期(C)的治疗。患者接受卡非佐米治疗,第 1、2、8、9、22、23、29、30 天(20 mg/m:C1D1,C1D2;此后 36 mg/m)或硼替佐米治疗,第 1、4、8、11、22、25、29、32 天(1.3 mg/m:C5-9 周期中第 4、11、25、32 天省略)。马法兰(9 mg/m)和泼尼松(60 mg/m)在第 1-4 天给予。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。955 例患者被随机分组(意向治疗人群:KMP 组,n=478;VMP 组,n=477)。KMP 组的中位 PFS 为 22.3 个月,VMP 组为 22.1 个月(风险比[HR],0.906;95%置信区间[CI],0.746-1.101;P=0.159)。两组的中位总生存期相似,均未达到(HR,1.08;95%CI,0.82-1.43)。KMP 组的总缓解率为 84.3%,VMP 组为 78.8%。完全缓解率 KMP 组为 25.9%,VMP 组为 23.1%。微小残留病灶阴性率 KMP 组为 15.7%(KMP),VMP 组为 15.5%(VMP)。KMP 组中发生率高于 VMP 组≥5%的患者的有兴趣的不良事件(任何级别)为急性肾衰竭(13.9%[KMP] vs 6.2%[VMP])和心力衰竭(10.8% vs 4.3%)。≥3 级不良事件发生率为 74.7%(KMP)和 76.2%(VMP)。KMP 组的≥2 级周围神经病变发生率低于 VMP 组(2.5% vs 35.1%)。CLARION 研究中 KMP 治疗在统计学上并未显著改善与 VMP 相比的 PFS。该试验在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册,编号为#NCT01818752。

相似文献

1
Carfilzomib or bortezomib with melphalan-prednisone for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.卡非佐米或硼替佐米联合马法兰-泼尼松用于不适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者。
Blood. 2019 May 2;133(18):1953-1963. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-09-874396. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
2
Autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation versus bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone, with or without bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone consolidation therapy, and lenalidomide maintenance for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (EMN02/HO95): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study.自体造血干细胞移植对比硼替佐米-美法仑-泼尼松(联合或不联合硼替佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松巩固治疗)以及来那度胺维持治疗用于新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤(EMN02/HO95):一项多中心、随机、开放标签的3期研究
Lancet Haematol. 2020 Jun;7(6):e456-e468. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30099-5. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
3
Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone Versus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone in Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Frailty Subgroup Analysis of ALCYONE.达雷妥尤单抗联合硼替佐米、美法仑和泼尼松与硼替佐米、美法仑和泼尼松在不适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤中的应用:ALCYONE 研究体弱亚组分析。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 Nov;21(11):785-798. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
4
Overall survival with daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (ALCYONE): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.达雷妥尤单抗联合硼替佐米、美法仑和泼尼松治疗新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(ALCYONE)的总生存:一项随机、开放标签、3 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 11;395(10218):132-141. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32956-3. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
5
Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone Versus Standard of Care in Latin America for Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Propensity Score Matching Analysis.达雷妥尤单抗联合硼替佐米、美法仑和泼尼松与新诊断不适合移植的多发性骨髓瘤拉丁美洲的标准治疗的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Adv Ther. 2020 Dec;37(12):4996-5009. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01521-9. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
6
Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone With or Without Daratumumab in Transplant-ineligible Asian Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: The Phase 3 OCTANS Study.硼替佐米、美法仑和泼尼松联合或不联合达雷妥尤单抗治疗不适合移植的初诊亚洲多发性骨髓瘤患者:III 期 OCTANS 研究。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023 Jun;23(6):446-455.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.02.009. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
7
Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide followed by maintenance with bortezomib-thalidomide compared with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma: updated follow-up and improved survival.硼替佐米-马法兰-泼尼松-沙利度胺序贯治疗随后硼替佐米-沙利度胺维持治疗与硼替佐米-马法兰-泼尼松方案比较用于初治多发性骨髓瘤:更新随访结果和改善生存。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 1;32(7):634-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.0023. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
8
Comparative Efficacy of Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone (VMP) With or Without Daratumumab Versus VMP Alone in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Propensity Score Matching of ALCYONE and VISTA Phase III Studies.硼替佐米、马法兰和泼尼松(VMP)联合或不联合达雷妥尤单抗与 VMP 单药治疗新诊断多发性骨髓瘤的疗效比较:ALCYONE 和 VISTA Ⅲ期研究的倾向评分匹配。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020 Jul;20(7):480-489. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.02.018. Epub 2020 Mar 7.
9
Bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone versus bortezomib, thalidomide, and prednisone as induction therapy followed by maintenance treatment with bortezomib and thalidomide versus bortezomib and prednisone in elderly patients with untreated multiple myeloma: a randomised trial.硼替佐米、马法兰和泼尼松与硼替佐米、沙利度胺和泼尼松作为诱导治疗,随后用硼替佐米和沙利度胺维持治疗与硼替佐米和泼尼松治疗未经治疗的老年多发性骨髓瘤患者:一项随机试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Oct;11(10):934-41. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70187-X. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
10
Sequential therapy of four cycles of bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisolone followed by continuous lenalidomide and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.硼替佐米、马法兰和泼尼松龙 4 个疗程序贯治疗后,不适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者接受来那度胺和地塞米松持续治疗。
Ann Hematol. 2020 Jan;99(1):137-145. doi: 10.1007/s00277-019-03859-9. Epub 2019 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Current and future role of carfilzomib-based quadruplet combinations as therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.基于卡非佐米的四联组合疗法在新诊断多发性骨髓瘤治疗中的当前及未来作用
Hemasphere. 2025 Jul 16;9(7):e70178. doi: 10.1002/hem3.70178. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Potential surrogate endpoint for B-cell hematologic malignancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.B细胞血液系统恶性肿瘤的潜在替代终点:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 2;15(1):19300. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05053-6.
3
The efficacy of new drug regimens in treating newly diagnosed high-risk cytogenetic multiple myeloma patients: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
新药方案治疗新诊断的高危细胞遗传学多发性骨髓瘤患者的疗效:一项系统文献综述和荟萃分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 13;12:1575914. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1575914. eCollection 2025.
4
Carfilzomib in multiple myeloma: unraveling cardiac toxicities - from mechanisms to diagnosis and management.卡非佐米治疗多发性骨髓瘤:揭示心脏毒性——从机制到诊断与管理
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 27;16:1570017. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1570017. eCollection 2025.
5
Opportunities and challenges for MRD assessment in the clinical management of multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤临床管理中微小残留病评估的机遇与挑战
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025 Apr 7. doi: 10.1038/s41571-025-01017-x.
6
Challenges in Multiple Myeloma Therapy in Older and Frail Patients.老年和体弱患者多发性骨髓瘤治疗中的挑战
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 11;17(6):944. doi: 10.3390/cancers17060944.
7
Multiple Myeloma Insights from Single-Cell Analysis: Clonal Evolution, the Microenvironment, Therapy Evasion, and Clinical Implications.单细胞分析对多发性骨髓瘤的见解:克隆进化、微环境、治疗逃逸及临床意义
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 14;17(4):653. doi: 10.3390/cancers17040653.
8
Evidence-based Korean guidelines for the clinical management of multiple myeloma: addressing 12 key clinical questions.基于证据的韩国多发性骨髓瘤临床管理指南:解决12个关键临床问题。
Blood Res. 2025 Feb 4;60(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s44313-025-00055-9.
9
Multiple Myeloma: Improved Outcomes Resulting from a Rapidly Expanding Number of Therapeutic Options.多发性骨髓瘤:治疗选择数量迅速增加带来的预后改善
Target Oncol. 2025 Mar;20(2):247-267. doi: 10.1007/s11523-024-01122-4. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
10
Evaluating Minimal Residual Disease Negativity as a Surrogate Endpoint for Treatment Efficacy in Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.评估微小残留病阴性作为多发性骨髓瘤治疗疗效替代终点:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Am J Hematol. 2025 Mar;100(3):427-438. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27582. Epub 2025 Jan 9.