文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

硼替佐米、美法仑和泼尼松联合或不联合达雷妥尤单抗治疗不适合移植的初诊亚洲多发性骨髓瘤患者:III 期 OCTANS 研究。

Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone With or Without Daratumumab in Transplant-ineligible Asian Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: The Phase 3 OCTANS Study.

机构信息

Department of Hematology, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China; Department of Hematology, Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China.

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.

出版信息

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023 Jun;23(6):446-455.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.02.009. Epub 2023 Mar 4.


DOI:10.1016/j.clml.2023.02.009
PMID:37024420
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the global phase 3 ALCYONE trial, daratumumab plus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (D-VMP) improved outcomes versus VMP in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. Here, we report the primary analysis of the phase 3 OCTANS trial of D-VMP versus VMP in transplant-ineligible Asian NDMM patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 220 patients were randomized (2:1) to receive 9 cycles of VMP (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m subcutaneously twice weekly in Cycle 1 and weekly in Cycles 2 to 9; melphalan 9 mg/m orally; and prednisone 60 mg/m orally on Days 1 to 4 of each cycle) ± daratumumab 16 mg/kg intravenously weekly in Cycle 1, every 3 weeks in Cycles 2 to 9, and every 4 weeks thereafter until disease progression. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 12.3 months, very good partial response or better rates (primary endpoint) were 74.0% versus 43.2% with D-VMP versus VMP (odds ratio, 3.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.99-6.43; P < .0001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) with D-VMP versus VMP was not reached versus 18.2 months (hazard ratio, .43; 95% CI, .24-.77; P = .0033); 12-month PFS rates were 84.2% versus 64.6%. The most frequent grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events with D-VMP/VMP were thrombocytopenia (46.5%/45.1%), neutropenia (39.6%/50.7%), and leukopenia (31.3%/36.6%). CONCLUSION: D-VMP demonstrated a favorable benefit/risk profile in transplant-ineligible Asian NDMM patients. This trial was registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov as #NCT03217812.

摘要

介绍:在全球 III 期 ALCYONE 试验中,与 VMP 相比,达雷妥尤单抗联合硼替佐米/马法兰/泼尼松(D-VMP)改善了不适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者的结局。在此,我们报告了 D-VMP 与 VMP 治疗不适合移植的亚洲 NDMM 患者的 III 期 OCTANS 试验的主要分析结果。

患者和方法:共 220 例患者按 2:1 的比例随机分组,分别接受 9 个周期的 VMP(硼替佐米 1.3 mg/m2 皮下注射,第 1 周期为每周 2 次,第 2 周期至第 9 周期为每周 1 次;马法兰 9 mg/m2 口服;泼尼松 60 mg/m2 口服,每个周期第 1 天至第 4 天)±D-VMP(达雷妥尤单抗 16 mg/kg 静脉注射,第 1 周期每周 1 次,第 2 周期至第 9 周期每 3 周 1 次,此后每 4 周 1 次,直至疾病进展)。

结果:中位随访 12.3 个月后,D-VMP 组的非常好的部分缓解或更好的缓解率(主要终点)为 74.0%,而 VMP 组为 43.2%(比值比,3.57;95%置信区间 [CI],1.99-6.43;P<0.0001)。D-VMP 组与 VMP 组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为未达到和 18.2 个月(风险比,0.43;95%CI,0.24-0.77;P=0.0033);12 个月的 PFS 率分别为 84.2%和 64.6%。D-VMP/VMP 最常见的 3/4 级治疗相关不良事件为血小板减少症(46.5%/45.1%)、中性粒细胞减少症(39.6%/50.7%)和白细胞减少症(31.3%/36.6%)。

结论:D-VMP 在不适合移植的亚洲 NDMM 患者中显示出良好的获益/风险比。该试验在中国临床试验注册中心(www.chictr.org.cn)注册,注册号为 NCT03217812。

相似文献

[1]
Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone With or Without Daratumumab in Transplant-ineligible Asian Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: The Phase 3 OCTANS Study.

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023-6

[2]
Overall survival with daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (ALCYONE): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Lancet. 2019-12-10

[3]
Daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone versus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone alone in transplant-ineligible Asian patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the phase 3 OCTANS Study.

Ann Hematol. 2025-1

[4]
Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone Versus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone in Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Frailty Subgroup Analysis of ALCYONE.

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021-11

[5]
Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone Versus Standard of Care in Latin America for Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Adv Ther. 2020-12

[6]
Daratumumab plus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone in East Asian patients with non-transplant multiple myeloma: subanalysis of the randomized phase 3 ALCYONE trial.

Ann Hematol. 2019-10-16

[7]
Autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation versus bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone, with or without bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone consolidation therapy, and lenalidomide maintenance for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (EMN02/HO95): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study.

Lancet Haematol. 2020-6

[8]
The effects of different schedules of bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are transplant ineligible: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison.

Leuk Lymphoma. 2020-3

[9]
Carfilzomib or bortezomib with melphalan-prednisone for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Blood. 2019-2-28

[10]
Comparative Efficacy of Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone (VMP) With or Without Daratumumab Versus VMP Alone in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Propensity Score Matching of ALCYONE and VISTA Phase III Studies.

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
Potential surrogate endpoint for B-cell hematologic malignancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sci Rep. 2025-6-2

[2]
Health-related quality of life with daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone versus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone alone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: analysis of the phase 3 OCTANS study.

Ann Hematol. 2025-5-23

[3]
Optimal daratumumab-based regimen for patients with newly diagnosed and previously untreated multiple myeloma: systematic review and component network meta-analysis.

Syst Rev. 2025-5-16

[4]
Real-world analysis of treatment patterns, effectiveness, and safety of daratumumab-based regimens in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

BMC Cancer. 2025-5-7

[5]
Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for multiple myeloma in Korean patients: a database study.

BMC Cancer. 2025-2-28

[6]
Evaluation of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody-based immunotherapy in multiple myeloma with renal insufficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ther Adv Hematol. 2025-2-17

[7]
Efficacy and safety of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies-based therapy versus standard therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ther Adv Hematol. 2025-1-27

[8]
Evaluating Minimal Residual Disease Negativity as a Surrogate Endpoint for Treatment Efficacy in Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Am J Hematol. 2025-3

[9]
Daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone versus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone alone in transplant-ineligible Asian patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the phase 3 OCTANS Study.

Ann Hematol. 2025-1

[10]
Quadruplet regimen for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma is effective in the standard-risk subgroup but not in the high-risk subgroup.

Front Pharmacol. 2024-5-9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索