• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国电力部门没有 COVID-19 带来的气候利好。

No COVID-19 climate silver lining in the US power sector.

机构信息

Highland Energy Analytics, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2021 Aug 3;12(1):4675. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24959-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-24959-z
PMID:34344875
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8333368/
Abstract

Recent studies conclude that the global coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic decreased power sector CO emissions globally and in the United States. In this paper, we analyze the statistical significance of CO emissions reductions in the U.S. power sector from March through December 2020. We use Gaussian process (GP) regression to assess whether CO emissions reductions would have occurred with reasonable probability in the absence of COVID-19 considering uncertainty due to factors unrelated to the pandemic and adjusting for weather, seasonality, and recent emissions trends. We find that monthly CO emissions reductions are only statistically significant in April and May 2020 considering hypothesis tests at 5% significance levels. Separately, we consider the potential impact of COVID-19 on coal-fired power plant retirements through 2022. We find that only a small percentage of U.S. coal power plants are at risk of retirement due to a possible COVID-19-related sustained reduction in electricity demand and prices. We observe and anticipate a return to pre-COVID-19 CO emissions in the U.S. power sector.

摘要

最近的研究得出结论,全球冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行在全球和美国减少了电力部门的 CO 排放。在本文中,我们分析了 2020 年 3 月至 12 月美国电力部门 CO 减排的统计显著性。我们使用高斯过程(GP)回归来评估在没有 COVID-19 的情况下,考虑到与大流行无关的因素引起的不确定性,并考虑到天气、季节性和近期排放趋势,CO 减排是否会以合理的概率发生。我们发现,仅在 2020 年 4 月和 5 月考虑到 5%显着性水平的假设检验,每月的 CO 减排才具有统计学意义。另外,我们考虑了 COVID-19 对 2022 年之前燃煤电厂退役的潜在影响。我们发现,由于 COVID-19 相关的电力需求和价格持续下降,只有一小部分美国燃煤电厂面临退役风险。我们观察到并预计美国电力部门的 CO 排放量将恢复到 COVID-19 之前的水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b39/8333368/d3b7b68fde04/41467_2021_24959_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b39/8333368/bf269d563aaa/41467_2021_24959_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b39/8333368/9d66582982ea/41467_2021_24959_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b39/8333368/21a0e4a761ba/41467_2021_24959_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b39/8333368/775db9bac95e/41467_2021_24959_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b39/8333368/831cb418d44f/41467_2021_24959_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b39/8333368/d3b7b68fde04/41467_2021_24959_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b39/8333368/bf269d563aaa/41467_2021_24959_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b39/8333368/9d66582982ea/41467_2021_24959_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b39/8333368/21a0e4a761ba/41467_2021_24959_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b39/8333368/775db9bac95e/41467_2021_24959_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b39/8333368/831cb418d44f/41467_2021_24959_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b39/8333368/d3b7b68fde04/41467_2021_24959_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
No COVID-19 climate silver lining in the US power sector.美国电力部门没有 COVID-19 带来的气候利好。
Nat Commun. 2021 Aug 3;12(1):4675. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24959-z.
2
Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.近期天然气价格下降对美国电力部门二氧化碳排放的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Mar 6;46(5):3014-21. doi: 10.1021/es203750k. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
3
Assessment of potential carbon dioxide reductions due to biomass-coal cofiring in the United States.美国生物质与煤共燃带来的潜在二氧化碳减排量评估。
Environ Sci Technol. 2003 Nov 15;37(22):5081-9. doi: 10.1021/es034367q.
4
Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.评估美国环保署关于二氧化碳捕集和封存在新型化石燃料发电厂中作用的决定。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Jul 15;48(14):7723-9. doi: 10.1021/es501748r. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
5
Accelerated reduction in SO₂ emissions from the U.S. power sector triggered by changing prices of natural gas.美国天然气价格变化引发的美国电力部门二氧化硫排放量加速减少。
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Jul 17;46(14):7882-9. doi: 10.1021/es301023c. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
6
Electricity from fossil fuels without CO2 emissions: assessing the costs of carbon dioxide capture and sequestration in U.S. electricity markets.来自化石燃料且无二氧化碳排放的电力:评估美国电力市场中二氧化碳捕集与封存的成本。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2001 Oct;51(10):1452-9. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2001.10464370.
7
Carbon dioxide emissions from the electricity sector in major countries: a decomposition analysis.主要国家电力部门的二氧化碳排放:分解分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Mar;25(7):6814-6825. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-1013-z. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
8
Water impacts of CO2 emission performance standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants.火电厂二氧化碳排放绩效标准的用水影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Oct 21;48(20):11769-76. doi: 10.1021/es502896z. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
9
Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.通过二氧化碳捕集、利用和封存实现美国现有燃煤电厂脱碳的机会。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Jul 7;49(13):7571-9. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01120. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
10
Comparison of two U.S. power-plant carbon dioxide emissions data sets.两个美国发电厂二氧化碳排放数据集的比较。
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Aug 1;42(15):5688-93. doi: 10.1021/es800221q.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding carbon resilience under public health emergencies: a synthetic difference-in-differences approach.理解公共卫生紧急事件下的碳弹性:综合双重差分法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 4;14(1):20581. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69785-7.
2
The effects of COVID-19 transmission on environmental sustainability and human health: Paving the way to ensure its sustainable management.新冠疫情传播对环境可持续性和人类健康的影响:为确保其可持续管理铺平道路。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 10;838(Pt 2):156039. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156039. Epub 2022 May 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the U.S. Electricity Demand and Supply: An Early View From Data.新冠疫情对美国电力供需的影响:基于数据的早期观察
IEEE Access. 2020 Aug 17;8:151523-151534. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3016912. eCollection 2020.
2
Impact of COVID-19 Measures on Short-Term Electricity Consumption in the Most Affected EU Countries and USA States.新冠疫情防控措施对欧盟受影响最严重国家及美国部分州短期电力消耗的影响
iScience. 2020 Oct 23;23(10):101639. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101639. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
3
The Short-run and Long-run Effects of Covid-19 on Energy and the Environment.新冠疫情对能源与环境的短期及长期影响
Joule. 2020 Jul 15;4(7):1337-1341. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
4
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python.SciPy 1.0:Python 中的科学计算基础算法。
Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2. Epub 2020 Feb 3.