• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适度放牧是实现最佳保护和土壤资源利用的最佳措施(案例研究:伊朗北呼罗珊省 Bozdaghin 牧场)。

Moderate grazing is the best measure to achieve the optimal conservation and soil resource utilization (case study: Bozdaghin rangelands, North Khorasan, Iran).

机构信息

Department of Natural Resources, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.

Department of Natural Resources, Torbat-E-Jam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Torbat-e-Jam, Iran.

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2021 Aug 3;193(9):549. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-09334-1.

DOI:10.1007/s10661-021-09334-1
PMID:34345952
Abstract

The study of the variability of physical and chemical factors of soil due to different intensities of livestock grazing can help in the management and maintenance of soil and vegetation. Accordingly, the effect of livestock grazing intensities on soil properties and vegetation in Bozdaghin rangelands of North Khorasan province was investigated. To investigate the effect of different livestock grazing intensities, Three 5-hectare plots in the study area were determined under different treatments (ungrazed (UG), moderate grazing (MG), and heavy grazing (HG)), and the effect of three grazing intensities on vegetation and soil physicochemical and erodibility properties (SPEP) was evaluated. The soil sampling process was performed at depths of 0-15, 15-30 cm and SPEP including soil saturation moisture (SSM), soil texture (percentage of clay, sand, and silt), absorbable potassium (K), electrical conductivity (EC), soil organic matter (SOM), absorbable phosphorus (P), acidity (pH), and bulk density were evaluated, and Soil Erodibility Index (SEI) was calculated by implementing the modified clay ratio relation. To assess the impact of various grazing intensities on all measured characteristics, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and Duncan tests were utilized to compare the means and their grouping. The results showed that HG compared to MG causes worrying consequences in the first soil depth. Also with increasing grazing intensity, plant production percentage (P < 0.05) and vegetation density (P < 0.01) decreased, and the amount of bare soil (P < 0.01) increased. Also, with increasing grazing intensity, the amount of pH, EC, clay, saturated moisture, and N decreased (P < 0.01), but the amount of silt, sand, K, P, calcium (Ca), lime, and SOM increased (P < 0.01). UG improves soil quality, MG intensity causes optimal conservation and utilization of soil resources, and HG intensity causes severe changes in rangeland soil properties. In areas with MG intensity, due to the increase of the percentage of vegetation (an increase of SOM and prevents the direct impact of raindrops on the soil aggregates) and as a result improvement of soil structure and texture, an increase of water infiltration, and decrease of runoff, and the rate of soil erodibility and water erosion, the rangeland soil decreases and results in sustainable production. This results in optimal conservation and utilization of soil resources. So to sustainably exploit and balance the conservation of biodiversity, livestock production, and soil carbon and nitrogen management, MG is recommended.

摘要

由于不同强度的牲畜放牧,土壤的物理和化学因素的变化研究有助于土壤和植被的管理和维护。因此,研究了北呼罗珊省博兹达金牧场不同牲畜放牧强度对土壤性质和植被的影响。为了研究不同牲畜放牧强度的影响,在研究区域内确定了三个 5 公顷的地块,进行不同处理(未放牧(UG)、中度放牧(MG)和重度放牧(HG)),并评估了三种放牧强度对植被和土壤物理化学和可蚀性特性(SPEP)的影响。土壤采样过程在 0-15、15-30 cm 的深度进行,SPEP 包括土壤饱和水分(SSM)、土壤质地(粘土、沙子和粉土的百分比)、可吸收钾(K)、电导率(EC)、土壤有机质(SOM)、可吸收磷(P)、酸度(pH)和容重,并通过实施改良的粘土比例关系计算土壤可蚀性指数(SEI)。为了评估各种放牧强度对所有测量特征的影响,采用多元方差分析(MANOVA)和邓肯检验比较平均值及其分组。结果表明,与 MG 相比,HG 在第一个土壤深度造成令人担忧的后果。随着放牧强度的增加,植物产量百分比(P < 0.05)和植被密度(P < 0.01)下降,裸土量(P < 0.01)增加。随着放牧强度的增加,pH 值、EC、粘土、饱和水分和 N 的量减少(P < 0.01),但粉土、沙子、K、P、钙(Ca)、石灰和 SOM 的量增加(P < 0.01)。UG 改善了土壤质量,MG 强度导致土壤资源的最佳保护和利用,HG 强度导致牧场土壤性质的严重变化。在 MG 强度的区域,由于植被百分比的增加(SOM 的增加和防止雨滴直接对土壤团聚体的影响)以及土壤结构和质地的改善、水入渗的增加、径流量的减少以及土壤可蚀性和水蚀率的降低,牧场土壤减少,导致可持续生产。这导致了土壤资源的最佳保护和利用。因此,为了可持续地开发和平衡生物多样性保护、牲畜生产以及土壤碳氮管理,建议采用 MG。

相似文献

1
Moderate grazing is the best measure to achieve the optimal conservation and soil resource utilization (case study: Bozdaghin rangelands, North Khorasan, Iran).适度放牧是实现最佳保护和土壤资源利用的最佳措施(案例研究:伊朗北呼罗珊省 Bozdaghin 牧场)。
Environ Monit Assess. 2021 Aug 3;193(9):549. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-09334-1.
2
Long-term grazing exclosure: implications on water erosion and soil physicochemical properties (case study: Bozdaghin rangelands, North Khorasan, Iran).长期禁牧区:对水蚀和土壤物理化学性质的影响(案例研究:伊朗北呼罗珊省博兹达格欣牧场)。
Environ Monit Assess. 2021 Jan 9;193(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08819-9.
3
Effects of grazing on chemical soil properties and vegetation cover (case study: Kojour rangelands, Noushahr, Islamic Republic of Iran).放牧对土壤化学性质和植被覆盖的影响(案例研究:伊朗伊斯兰共和国努沙赫尔的科居尔牧场)
Pak J Biol Sci. 2007 Dec 15;10(24):4391-8. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2007.4391.4398.
4
Topography, grazing, and soil textures control over rangelands' vegetation quantity and quality.地形、放牧和土壤质地控制着草原植被的数量和质量。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Dec 20;697:134153. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134153. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
5
Changes in select soil properties of lightly grazed highland rangelands.轻度放牧的高原牧场土壤特性的变化。
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Nov 25;195(12):1528. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-12160-2.
6
Response of vegetation and soil carbon and nitrogen storage to grazing intensity in semi-arid grasslands in the agro-pastoral zone of northern china.中国北方农牧交错区半干旱草原植被及土壤碳氮储量对放牧强度的响应
PLoS One. 2014 May 12;9(5):e96604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096604. eCollection 2014.
7
Soil properties and species composition under different grazing intensity in an alpine meadow on the eastern Tibetan Plateau, China.中国青藏高原东部高寒草甸不同放牧强度下的土壤性质与物种组成
Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Dec;188(12):678. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5663-y. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
8
Effects of grazing exclusion on soil properties and on ecosystem carbon and nitrogen storage in a sandy rangeland of Inner Mongolia, northern China.放牧去除对中国内蒙古沙质草原土壤性质及生态系统碳氮储量的影响。
Environ Manage. 2012 Oct;50(4):622-32. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9919-1. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
9
A global meta-analysis of livestock grazing impacts on soil properties.全球畜牧业对土壤特性影响的元分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 7;15(8):e0236638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236638. eCollection 2020.
10
Physical and chemical properties of the soils in selected communal property associations of South Africa.南非部分公有财产协会土壤的物理和化学性质。
PeerJ. 2022 Oct 19;10:e13960. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13960. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting nepetalactone accumulation in Nepeta persica using machine learning algorithms and geospatial analysis.使用机器学习算法和地理空间分析预测波斯荆芥中荆芥内酯的积累。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 27;15(1):31535. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17039-5.
2
Ecological and Statistical Evaluation of Genetic Algorithm (GARP), Maximum Entropy Method, and Logistic Regression in Predicting Spatial Distribution of sp.遗传算法(GARP)、最大熵方法和逻辑回归在预测[物种名称]空间分布中的生态与统计评估
Scientifica (Cairo). 2025 Mar 31;2025:4003408. doi: 10.1155/sci5/4003408. eCollection 2025.
3
Assessment of Physicochemical Properties and Heavy Metal Content of Floriculture Soil in Amhara Region of Northwest Ethiopia.
埃塞俄比亚西北部阿姆哈拉地区花卉种植土壤的理化性质和重金属含量评估
ScientificWorldJournal. 2024 Aug 19;2024:9945257. doi: 10.1155/2024/9945257. eCollection 2024.