• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

盆腔廓清术后的功能结果:一项前瞻性队列研究的结果。

Functional outcomes following pelvic exenteration: results from a prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;23(10):2647-2658. doi: 10.1111/codi.15834. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1111/codi.15834
PMID:34346149
Abstract

AIM

Postoperative functional outcomes following pelvic exenteration surgery for treatment of advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancies are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine the short-term functional outcomes following pelvic exenteration surgery using objective measures of physical function.

METHOD

Patients undergoing pelvic exenteration surgery between January 2017 and May 2020 were recruited at a single quaternary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. The primary measures were the 6-min walk test (6MWT) and the five times sit to stand (5STS) test. Data were collected at baseline (preoperatively), 10 days postoperatively and at discharge from hospital, and were analysed according to tumour type, extent of exenteration, sacrectomy, length of hospital stay, major nerve resection and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The cohort of patients that participated in functional assessments consisted of 135 patients, with a median age of 61 years. Pelvic exenteration patients had a reduced 6MWT distance preoperatively compared to the general population (P < 0.001). Following surgery, we observed a further decrease in 6MWT distance (P < 0.001) and an increase in time to complete 5STS (P < 0.001) at postoperative day 10 compared to baseline, with a slight improvement at discharge. There were no differences in 6MWT and 5STS outcomes between patients based on comparisons of surgical and oncological factors.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic exenteration patients are functionally impaired in the preoperative period compared to the general population. Surgery causes a further reduction in physical function in the short term; however, functional outcomes are not impacted by tumour type, extent of exenteration, sacrectomy or nerve resection.

摘要

目的

对于治疗晚期或复发性盆腔恶性肿瘤的盆腔廓清术,术后功能结局知之甚少。本研究旨在通过身体功能的客观测量来确定盆腔廓清术后的短期功能结局。

方法

在澳大利亚悉尼的一家四级转诊医院招募了 2017 年 1 月至 2020 年 5 月期间接受盆腔廓清术的患者。主要测量指标是 6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)和 5 次坐立测试(5STS)。数据在基线(术前)、术后 10 天和出院时收集,并根据肿瘤类型、廓清范围、骶骨切除术、住院时间、主要神经切除和术后并发症进行分析。

结果

参与功能评估的患者队列由 135 名患者组成,中位年龄为 61 岁。与一般人群相比,盆腔廓清患者术前的 6MWT 距离较短(P<0.001)。手术后,我们观察到 6MWT 距离在术后第 10 天进一步下降(P<0.001),完成 5STS 的时间增加(P<0.001),与基线相比,出院时略有改善。根据手术和肿瘤因素的比较,6MWT 和 5STS 结果在患者之间没有差异。

结论

与一般人群相比,盆腔廓清术患者在术前就存在功能障碍。手术在短期内进一步降低了身体功能;然而,肿瘤类型、廓清范围、骶骨切除术或神经切除并不影响功能结局。

相似文献

1
Functional outcomes following pelvic exenteration: results from a prospective cohort study.盆腔廓清术后的功能结果:一项前瞻性队列研究的结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;23(10):2647-2658. doi: 10.1111/codi.15834. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
2
The Price We Pay for Radical Curative Pelvic Exenterations: Prevalence and Management of Pain.我们为激进的根治性盆腔廓清术付出的代价:疼痛的发生率和处理。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Mar;61(3):314-319. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001013.
3
Sacral resection with pelvic exenteration for advanced primary and recurrent pelvic cancer: a single-institution experience of 100 sacrectomies.晚期原发性和复发性盆腔癌的骶骨切除术联合盆腔脏器清除术:单机构100例骶骨切除术的经验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Oct;57(10):1153-61. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000196.
4
Complications After Extended Radical Resections for Locally Advanced and Recurrent Pelvic Malignancies: A 25-Year Experience.局部晚期和复发性盆腔恶性肿瘤广泛根治术后的并发症:25 年经验。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Feb;27(2):409-414. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07816-8. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
5
Outcomes following repeat exenteration for locally advanced pelvic malignancy.局部晚期盆腔恶性肿瘤再次扩大切除术的疗效
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Mar;23(3):646-652. doi: 10.1111/codi.15402. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
6
Pelvic Exenteration for Advanced Nonrectal Pelvic Malignancy.盆腔廓清术治疗晚期非直肠盆腔恶性肿瘤。
Ann Surg. 2019 Nov;270(5):899-905. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003533.
7
Survival and morbidity outcomes after pelvic exenteration for pelvic sarcoma: an institutional series.盆腔肉瘤行盆腔脏器切除术的生存及发病结局:一项机构研究系列
ANZ J Surg. 2022 May;92(5):1038-1043. doi: 10.1111/ans.17275. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
8
Retrospective review of pelvic malignancies undergoing total pelvic exenteration.盆腔恶性肿瘤全盆腔切除术的回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun 15;10:110. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-110.
9
[Observational study on perioperative outcomes of pelvic exenteration].盆腔脏器廓清术围手术期结局的观察性研究
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Mar 25;26(3):260-267. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20221024-00428.
10
Outcomes of Pelvic Exenteration with en Bloc Partial or Complete Pubic Bone Excision for Locally Advanced Primary or Recurrent Pelvic Cancer.局部晚期原发性或复发性盆腔癌行整块部分或全耻骨切除盆腔廓清术的疗效
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Sep;59(9):831-5. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000656.

引用本文的文献

1
Radical resection of locally advanced and recurrent colorectal carcinoma involving major nerve resection: a systematic review of surgical, oncological and functional outcomes.局部晚期和复发性结直肠癌累及主要神经的根治性切除术:手术、肿瘤学和功能结局的系统评价。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Aug 20;39(1):135. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04707-7.
2
Development of a risk prediction tool for patients with locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer undergoing pelvic exenteration: protocol for a mixed-methods study.局部晚期和复发性直肠癌患者行盆腔廓清术的风险预测工具的开发:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 30;13(8):e075304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075304.
3
Feasibility, Reliability, and Safety of Remote Five Times Sit to Stand Test in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer.
胃肠道癌患者远程五次坐立试验的可行性、可靠性和安全性
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 24;15(9):2434. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092434.