Colletti V, Fiorino F G, Sittoni V
ENT Department, University of Verona, Italy.
Am J Otol. 1987 Nov;8(6):553-9.
The present study deals with 832 ossicular chain reconstruction procedures performed in 655 patients from January 1975 to December 1985. Homograft and autograft ossicles, intraoperatively minisculptured according to personal or traditional techniques, were used in 626 ears (75.2%). In the remaining 206 ears Plastipore or Proplast total or partial ossicular replacement prostheses were employed. The functional hearing results are evaluated as a function of length of follow-up, techniques used, and preoperative diagnosis. Short-term hearing gain is satisfactory and very similar for both ossicles and implants. Long-term observation however, shows, a progressive and systematic reduction of the postoperative hearing gain for both treatments. The long-term deterioration of hearing levels in ears receiving implants is more evident and dramatic than that observed in ears with ossicles. The difference is statistically significant. The causes of failure are evaluated based on both clinical data and findings at revision surgery.
本研究涉及1975年1月至1985年12月期间对655例患者实施的832例听骨链重建手术。626耳(75.2%)使用了根据个人或传统技术在术中进行微型雕刻的同种异体移植物和自体移植物听骨。其余206耳采用了Plastipore或Proplast全听骨或部分听骨置换假体。根据随访时间、所采用的技术和术前诊断对功能性听力结果进行评估。短期听力增益令人满意,听骨和植入物的情况非常相似。然而,长期观察显示,两种治疗方法的术后听力增益均呈渐进性和系统性下降。接受植入物的耳朵听力水平的长期恶化比使用听骨的耳朵更为明显和显著。差异具有统计学意义。基于临床数据和翻修手术的发现对失败原因进行评估。