• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童内镜下黏膜切除术。

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in Children.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.

出版信息

J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022 Jan 1;74(1):20-24. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003275.

DOI:10.1097/MPG.0000000000003275
PMID:34347680
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for removal of large polyps is well established in adults. EMR technique in the pediatric population is less utilized due to lower incidence of large intestinal polyps in pediatric patients and limited EMR training for pediatric gastroenterologists. The aim of this study is to retrospectively review safety and efficacy of pediatric EMR cases at two large, tertiary referral centers with adult and pediatric EMR expertise.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center from January 2012 to May 2021. Demographic, clinical, technical and follow up data were collected for patients <18 years of age who underwent EMR during the study period.

RESULTS

Fifteen pediatric EMR procedures were identified in 11 patients (five male, six female) during the study period. Indication was most frequently rectal bleeding. Polyp size removed ranged from 9 to 60 mm and pathology was consistent with juvenile inflammatory polyps in six patients. Technical success was achieved in 14 of 15 (93%) of EMRs with clinical success (desired clinical outcome) in all 13 procedures with clinical follow-up. There were no adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies a case series of pediatric patients who underwent EMR at two tertiary care centers. This series demonstrates successful EMR in children and shows a high technical and clinical success rate with a low complication rate. More investigation into EMR in pediatric patients is necessary, and its use should be isolated to centers with endoscopists with specific experience in EMR techniques.

摘要

目的

内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)用于切除大型息肉在成人中已得到广泛应用。由于儿科患者大肠息肉的发病率较低,且儿科胃肠病学家对 EMR 的培训有限,因此在儿科人群中较少应用 EMR 技术。本研究的目的是回顾性分析两家大型三级转诊中心具有成人和儿科 EMR 专业知识的儿科 EMR 病例的安全性和有效性。

方法

对 Cedars-Sinai 医疗中心和辛辛那提儿童医院医疗中心 2012 年 1 月至 2021 年 5 月期间的病历进行回顾性分析。收集了研究期间接受 EMR 的年龄<18 岁的患者的人口统计学、临床、技术和随访数据。

结果

在研究期间,共在 11 名患者(5 名男性,6 名女性)中发现了 15 例儿科 EMR 手术。主要适应证为直肠出血。切除的息肉大小为 9-60mm,其中 6 例病理检查符合青少年炎性息肉。15 例 EMR 中有 14 例(93%)获得技术成功,13 例有临床随访的 EMR 均获得临床成功(期望的临床结局)。无不良事件发生。

结论

本研究确定了在两家三级护理中心接受 EMR 的儿科患者的病例系列。本研究表明 EMR 可在儿童中安全进行,并显示出高的技术和临床成功率,并发症发生率低。需要对儿科患者的 EMR 进行更多的研究,并且应将其仅应用于具有 EMR 技术特定经验的内镜医生的中心。

相似文献

1
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in Children.儿童内镜下黏膜切除术。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022 Jan 1;74(1):20-24. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003275.
2
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.与传统的内镜下黏膜切除术相比,对于大型结直肠息肉,水下内镜黏膜切除术的复发率较低,且能更早进行治愈性切除。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4174-4183. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5474-4. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
3
Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center.内镜转诊中心导向的挑战性结直肠病变内镜黏膜下剥离术的结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.060. Epub 2012 May 31.
4
Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.三种不同内镜方法治疗 6-20mm 结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar;55(3):362-370. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1732456. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
5
Underwater colorectal EMR: remodeling endoscopic mucosal resection.水下结直肠 EMR:内镜黏膜切除术的重塑。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 May;81(5):1238-42. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.055. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
6
Cap-assisted Endoscopic Mucosal Resection is Highly Effective for Nonpedunculated Colorectal Lesions.帽辅助内镜黏膜切除术治疗无蒂结直肠病变疗效显著。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb;50(2):163-8. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000315.
7
Tip-in endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal sessile polyps.内镜黏膜下切除术治疗大肠大型无蒂息肉。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Apr;35(4):1820-1826. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07581-w. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
8
Endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps: results, adverse events and two-year outcome.内镜下结肠直肠息肉黏膜切除术:结果、不良事件和两年结局。
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2022 Jan-Mar;85(1):47-55. doi: 10.51821/85.1.9207.
9
Higher rate of en bloc resection with underwater than conventional endoscopic mucosal resection: A meta-analysis.水下内镜黏膜切除术整块切除率高于传统内镜黏膜切除术:一项荟萃分析。
Dig Liver Dis. 2021 Aug;53(8):958-964. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 29.
10
Safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas in the elderly.老年人大的无蒂结直肠腺瘤内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)的安全性
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;32(12):1711-1717. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2892-7. Epub 2017 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Is it time to revisit the need for pediatric polypectomy guidelines?是时候重新审视小儿息肉切除术指南的必要性了吗?
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2025 Aug;81(2):162-166. doi: 10.1002/jpn3.70113. Epub 2025 Jun 15.
2
Cold Snare Polypectomy in Pediatric Polyposis: A Multicenter Experience.儿童息肉病的冷圈套息肉切除术:多中心经验
Children (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;12(3):291. doi: 10.3390/children12030291.
3
Perioperative care bundle versus conventional perioperative care in pediatric patients undergoing minimally invasive digestive endoscopy.
围手术期护理集束化方案与传统围手术期护理在接受微创消化内镜检查的儿科患者中的比较。
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Feb;41(2):399-403. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.2.11369.