• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证改良版的里弗米德脑震荡后症状问卷(mRPQ)。

Validating the modified Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (mRPQ).

作者信息

Brooks Kelly Jack Lee, Sullivan Karen A

机构信息

School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Jan;37(1):207-226. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1942555. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1080/13854046.2021.1942555
PMID:34348079
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Response distortions in the reporting of postconcussion symptoms can occur for many reasons. The Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) was recently modified to include an embedded symptom validity indicator to test for atypical symptoms. The present study used a simulation design to investigate the psychometric properties of the modified RPQ (mRPQ).

METHOD

298 adult volunteers were randomised into three groups: honest responding (Controls, C) who reported actual, current symptoms; mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) simulators (MS) who role played being injured, and; biased mTBI simulators (BMS) who role played being injured and were asked to bias (exaggerate) their response. The MS and BMS participants received instructions to support the simulation. All participants completed the mRPQ and a modified Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (mNSI).

RESULTS

A 2 × 3 mixed ANOVA with one within-group variable (Symptom type: Standard or Atypical) and one between-group variable (Instruction type: C, MS, BMS) found a significant two-way interaction (p < .05, ηp2 = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

The BMS group had score elevations for both standard and atypical postconcussion symptoms; therefore, both symptom types should be considered when evaluating for biased responding. The mRPQ has promising psychometric properties and should be further developed.

摘要

目的

脑震荡后症状报告中的反应偏差可能由多种原因引起。最近对里弗米德脑震荡后症状问卷(RPQ)进行了修改,纳入了一个嵌入式症状效度指标,以检测非典型症状。本研究采用模拟设计来调查修改后的RPQ(mRPQ)的心理测量特性。

方法

298名成年志愿者被随机分为三组:如实报告组(对照组,C),报告实际的当前症状;轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)模拟组(MS),模拟受伤情况;有偏差的mTBI模拟组(BMS),模拟受伤情况并被要求给出有偏差(夸大)的回答。MS组和BMS组的参与者接受了支持模拟的指导。所有参与者都完成了mRPQ和修改后的神经行为症状量表(mNSI)。

结果

一项2×3混合方差分析,其中一个组内变量(症状类型:标准或非典型)和一个组间变量(指导类型:C、MS、BMS)发现了显著的双向交互作用(p <.05,ηp2 =.08)。

结论

BMS组在标准和非典型脑震荡后症状上的得分均有所升高;因此,在评估有偏差的反应时应同时考虑这两种症状类型。mRPQ具有良好的心理测量特性,应进一步开发。

相似文献

1
Validating the modified Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (mRPQ).验证改良版的里弗米德脑震荡后症状问卷(mRPQ)。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Jan;37(1):207-226. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1942555. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
2
Factor structure of the modified Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (mRPQ): an exploratory analysis with healthy adult simulators.改良后的 Rivermead 脑震荡后症状问卷(mRPQ)的因子结构:健康成人模拟者的探索性分析。
Brain Inj. 2023 Jan 28;37(2):87-94. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2023.2165150. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
3
Towards an embedded symptom validity indicator for the rivermead postconcussion symptom questionnaire.针对 Rivermead 脑震荡后症状问卷的嵌入式症状效度指标。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2021 Sep-Oct;28(5):512-524. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1660880. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
4
Linking Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) and Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) scores with item response theory.将 Rivermead 脑震荡后症状问卷 (RPQ) 和运动性脑震荡评估工具 (SCAT) 评分与项目反应理论相关联。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2023 Aug;29(7):696-703. doi: 10.1017/S1355617722000807. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
5
Comparing Traumatic Brain Injury Symptoms Reported via Questionnaires Versus a Novel Structured Interview.比较通过问卷和新型结构化访谈报告的创伤性脑损伤症状。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2022 Feb;28(2):143-153. doi: 10.1017/S1355617721000278. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
6
Association of Sex and Age With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Symptoms: A TRACK-TBI Study.性别和年龄与轻度创伤性脑损伤相关症状的关联:TRACK-TBI 研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e213046. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3046.
7
Applicability and clinical utility of the German rivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnaire in proxies of children after traumatic brain injury: an instrument validation study.德国 Rivermead 脑外伤后综合征问卷在儿童创伤性脑损伤后代表中的适用性和临床实用性:一项仪器验证研究。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03587-2.
8
Postconcussive symptom exaggeration after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.儿童轻度创伤性脑损伤后脑震荡后症状夸大。
Pediatrics. 2014 Apr;133(4):643-50. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3195. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
9
Usefulness of the rivermead postconcussion symptoms questionnaire and the trail-making test for outcome prediction in patients with mild traumatic brain injury.Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷及连线测验对轻度创伤性脑损伤患者预后预测的有效性
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2016;23(3):213-22. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2015.1038747. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
10
Comparison of the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory and the Rivermead Postconcussion Symptoms Questionnaire.神经行为症状量表与里弗米德脑震荡后症状问卷的比较。
Brain Inj. 2019;33(9):1165-1172. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1637024. Epub 2019 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Brain health concerns in former rugby players: clinical and cognitive phenotypes.前橄榄球运动员的脑健康问题:临床和认知表型
Brain. 2025 Aug 1;148(8):2698-2713. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae416.
2
Prospective cohort study of long-term neurological outcomes in retired elite athletes: the Advanced BiomaRker, Advanced Imaging and Neurocognitive (BRAIN) Health Study protocol.退休精英运动员长期神经学结局的前瞻性队列研究:高级生物标志物、高级成像与神经认知(BRAIN)健康研究方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 24;14(4):e082902. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082902.
3
Consensus Statement on Visual Rehabilitation in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
轻度创伤性脑损伤视觉康复共识声明。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2022 Dec;12(6):422-428. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200071.