• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良后的 Rivermead 脑震荡后症状问卷(mRPQ)的因子结构:健康成人模拟者的探索性分析。

Factor structure of the modified Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (mRPQ): an exploratory analysis with healthy adult simulators.

机构信息

School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

School of Psychology and Counselling, and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2023 Jan 28;37(2):87-94. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2023.2165150. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1080/02699052.2023.2165150
PMID:36653341
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Persistent postconcussion symptoms (PPCS) are challenging to diagnose. An improved diagnostic process could consider and postconcussion symptoms. This study examined the structure of a modified Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (mRPQ) with both symptom types.

METHOD

298 adult volunteers were randomized into groups: honest responders, mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) simulators (MS), and biased mTBI simulators (BMS). Both mTBI simulating groups were coached about mTBI and primed about the simulation context (compensation evaluation). The BMS group was also encouraged to bias (exaggerate) symptoms. The participants completed an online battery of tests, including the mRPQ.

RESULTS

An exploratory factor analysis of the mRPQ (full sample) revealed a three-factor solution, including a separate dimension for atypical symptoms (all item loadings >0.45, ~4% of explained variance). The overall and group analyses of the standard RPQ items (typical symptoms) found a one- or two-factor solution, as did the analyses of atypical symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with prior RPQ research, a unidimensional or bifactor structure was measurable from standard RPQ symptoms. Whilst this study did not find support for domain-level symptom scores for either typical or atypical symptoms, the findings support the use of an overall atypical symptoms score.

摘要

目的

持续性脑震荡后症状(PPCS)的诊断具有挑战性。改进的诊断过程可以考虑和脑震荡后症状。本研究用这两种症状类型来检验改良 Rivermead 脑震荡后症状问卷(mRPQ)的结构。

方法

298 名成年志愿者被随机分为三组:诚实反应者、轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)模拟者(MS)和有偏差的 mTBI 模拟者(BMS)。两个 mTBI 模拟组都接受了关于 mTBI 的辅导,并对模拟情境进行了提示(赔偿评估)。BMS 组还被鼓励夸大(夸大)症状。参与者完成了一系列在线测试,包括 mRPQ。

结果

对 mRPQ(全样本)的探索性因素分析显示,存在三个因素的解决方案,包括一个独立的非典型症状维度(所有项目的负荷>0.45,解释方差的~4%)。标准 RPQ 项目(典型症状)的总体和组分析以及非典型症状的分析发现了一个或两个因素的解决方案。

结论

与先前的 RPQ 研究一致,标准 RPQ 症状可测量出单维或双因素结构。虽然本研究没有发现典型或非典型症状的域级症状评分的支持,但这些发现支持使用整体非典型症状评分。

相似文献

1
Factor structure of the modified Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (mRPQ): an exploratory analysis with healthy adult simulators.改良后的 Rivermead 脑震荡后症状问卷(mRPQ)的因子结构:健康成人模拟者的探索性分析。
Brain Inj. 2023 Jan 28;37(2):87-94. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2023.2165150. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
2
Validating the modified Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (mRPQ).验证改良版的里弗米德脑震荡后症状问卷(mRPQ)。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Jan;37(1):207-226. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1942555. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
3
Towards an embedded symptom validity indicator for the rivermead postconcussion symptom questionnaire.针对 Rivermead 脑震荡后症状问卷的嵌入式症状效度指标。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2021 Sep-Oct;28(5):512-524. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1660880. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
4
Linking Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) and Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) scores with item response theory.将 Rivermead 脑震荡后症状问卷 (RPQ) 和运动性脑震荡评估工具 (SCAT) 评分与项目反应理论相关联。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2023 Aug;29(7):696-703. doi: 10.1017/S1355617722000807. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
5
Long-term factor structure of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptom Questionnaire in mild traumatic brain injury and normative sample.米德脑震荡后症状问卷在轻度创伤性脑损伤及常模样本中的长期因素结构
Brain Inj. 2019;33(5):618-622. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1570339. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
6
Invariance of the Bifactor Structure of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) Symptoms on the Rivermead Postconcussion Symptoms Questionnaire Across Time, Demographic Characteristics, and Clinical Groups: A TRACK-TBI Study.轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)症状在 Rivermead 脑震荡后症状问卷上的双因素结构在时间、人口统计学特征和临床分组上的不变性:TRACK-TBI 研究。
Assessment. 2021 Sep;28(6):1656-1670. doi: 10.1177/1073191120913941. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
7
Divergent Classification Methods of Post-Concussion Syndrome after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Prevalence Rates, Risk Factors, and Functional Outcome.轻度创伤性脑损伤后脑震荡后综合征的不同分类方法:患病率、危险因素和功能预后。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Jun 1;35(11):1233-1241. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5257. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
8
Construct validity and reliability of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire.Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷的结构效度和信度
Clin Rehabil. 2005 Dec;19(8):878-87. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr905oa.
9
Association of Sex and Age With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Symptoms: A TRACK-TBI Study.性别和年龄与轻度创伤性脑损伤相关症状的关联:TRACK-TBI 研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e213046. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3046.
10
Post-Concussion Symptoms Rule: Derivation and Validation of a Clinical Decision Rule for Early Prediction of Persistent Symptoms after a Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.脑震荡后症状规则:一种用于早期预测轻度创伤性脑损伤后持续症状的临床决策规则的推导和验证。
J Neurotrauma. 2022 Oct;39(19-20):1349-1362. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0026. Epub 2022 Sep 9.