J.S. Ilgen is associate professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, and a PhD candidate, School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4590-6570 .
A.B.H. de Bruin is professor, School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5178-0287 .
Acad Med. 2021 Nov 1;96(11S):S81-S86. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004308.
Safe and effective supervised practice requires a negotiated partnership between trainees and their supervisors. Substantial work has explored how supervisors make judgments about trainees' readiness to safely engage in critical professional activities, yet less is known about how trainees leverage the support of supervisors when they perceive themselves to be at the limits of their abilities. The purpose of this study is to explore how trainees use supervisory support to navigate experiences of clinical uncertainty.
Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, the authors explored how novice emergency medicine trainees conceptualized the role of their supervisors during experiences of clinical uncertainty. They employed a critical incident technique to elicit stories from participants immediately following clinical shifts between July and September 2020, and asked participants to describe their experiences of uncertainty within the context of supervised practice. Using constant comparison, 2 investigators coded line-by-line and organized these stories into focused codes. The relationships between these codes were discussed by the research team, and this enabled them to theorize about the relationships between the emergent themes.
Participants reported a strong desire for supported independence, where predictable and accessible supervisory structures enabled them to work semiautonomously through challenging clinical situations. They described a process of borrowing their supervisors' comfort during moments of uncertainty and mechanisms to strategically broadcast their evolving understanding of a situation to implicitly invoke (the right level of) support from their supervisors. They also highlighted challenges they faced when they felt insufficiently supported.
By borrowing comfort from-or deliberately projecting their thinking to-supervisors, trainees aimed to strike the appropriate balance between independence for the purposes of learning and support to ensure safety. Understanding these strategic efforts could help educators to better support trainees in their growth toward self-regulation.
安全有效的监督实践需要培训生和他们的导师之间达成协商一致的合作关系。大量工作已经探讨了主管人员如何判断培训生是否有能力安全地参与关键的专业活动,但对于培训生在感知到自己能力达到极限时如何利用主管人员的支持来应对,我们知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨培训生如何利用监督支持来应对临床不确定性。
使用建构主义扎根理论方法,作者探讨了新手急诊医学培训生在临床不确定性体验中如何理解他们主管人员的角色。他们采用关键事件技术,在 2020 年 7 月至 9 月期间的临床轮班结束后,立即从参与者那里收集故事,并要求参与者在监督实践的背景下描述他们的不确定性体验。两名调查员逐行编码,并使用常规定量比较法将这些故事组织成重点编码。研究团队讨论了这些代码之间的关系,这使他们能够对新兴主题之间的关系进行理论化。
参与者报告了强烈的独立支持愿望,可预测和可访问的监督结构使他们能够在具有挑战性的临床情况下半自主地工作。他们描述了一个在不确定时刻借用主管人员的舒适感的过程,以及在关键时刻有意地展示他们对情况的理解,以含蓄地请求(适当程度的)主管人员的支持的机制。他们还强调了在感到支持不足时面临的挑战。
通过从主管人员那里借用舒适感,或者有意地向他们展示自己的思维过程,培训生旨在在学习的独立性和确保安全的支持之间取得适当的平衡。理解这些策略性努力可以帮助教育者更好地支持培训生在自我调节方面的成长。