Suppr超能文献

洞察与平等:社会人口统计学关联的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Insight and equality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of socio-demographic associations.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.

Dickson Poon School of Law, King's College London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;68(7):1494-1506. doi: 10.1177/00207640211036174. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Insight into illness is often used in clinical and legal contexts, for example, as evidence of decision-making capacity. However, it is unclear whether this disadvantages certain groups protected under equality legislation. To our knowledge, this question has yet to be addressed systematically. Therefore, the present study reviews empirical studies that look at the relationship between insight and sociodemographic variables.

METHODS

A systematic search of six bibliographic databases (CENTRAL, CINAHL, Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO) was conducted, which yielded 6,192 results. Study characteristics and outcomes (associations between insight and socio-demographic variables) were then extracted from 207 eligible studies. This included protected characteristics under the Equality Act (2010): age, sex, ethnicity, marital status and religion. Weighted confidence estimates were calculated and relevant moderators included in a random effects meta-analysis. A study protocol was registered prospectively on PROSPERO, ID: CRD42019120117.

RESULTS

Insight was not strongly associated with any sociodemographic variable. Better insight was weakly but significantly associated with white ethnicity, being employed, younger age and more years of education. The age associations were mostly explained by relevant moderating variables. For people with schizophrenia, the associations between sociodemographic variables and insight were comparable to associations with decision making capacity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that insight is not strongly associated with any sociodemographic variables. Further research is needed to clarify potential associations, particularly with non-white ethnicity and proxies for social support.

摘要

背景

洞察病情通常用于临床和法律环境中,例如,作为决策能力的证据。然而,目前尚不清楚这是否会对平等立法所保护的某些群体不利。据我们所知,这个问题尚未得到系统解决。因此,本研究综述了研究洞察与社会人口学变量之间关系的实证研究。

方法

对六个文献数据库(CENTRAL、CINAHL、Cochrane 系统评价图书馆、EMBASE、MEDLINE 和 PsycINFO)进行了系统检索,共产生了 6192 个结果。然后从 207 项合格研究中提取研究特征和结果(洞察与社会人口学变量之间的关联)。这包括《平等法》(2010 年)规定的受保护特征:年龄、性别、种族、婚姻状况和宗教信仰。计算了加权置信估计值,并在随机效应荟萃分析中纳入了相关的调节变量。研究方案已在 PROSPERO 上进行了前瞻性注册,注册号为:CRD42019120117。

结果

洞察与任何社会人口学变量都没有很强的关联。更好的洞察与白种人、就业、年轻和受教育程度较高有微弱但显著的关联。年龄关联主要由相关的调节变量解释。对于精神分裂症患者,社会人口学变量与洞察力之间的关联与决策能力的关联相当。

结论

我们的结果表明,洞察力与任何社会人口学变量都没有很强的关联。需要进一步研究以澄清潜在的关联,特别是与非白种人和社会支持的替代指标相关的关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2670/9549177/ef9dc8a5ee18/10.1177_00207640211036174-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验