• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导法与体表标志技术用于剖宫产蛛网膜下腔阻滞的时间比较——一项随机对照研究

Comparison of the time taken for subarachnoid block using ultrasound-guided method versus landmark technique for cesarean section - A randomized controlled study.

作者信息

Gayathri B, Swetha Ramani C K, Urkavalan Karthika, Pushparani A, Rajendran A

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.

Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Dharmapuri Medical College Hospital, Dharmapuri, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Apr-Jun;37(2):205-209. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_35_20. Epub 2021 Jul 15.

DOI:10.4103/joacp.JOACP_35_20
PMID:34349367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8289655/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Spinal anesthesia is the regional technique preferred for cesarean section and is usually administered using the traditional landmark technique. Ultrasonography of the spine appears to be helpful in locating the puncture site and increasing the success rate. The primary objective of this study was to assess the use of ultrasonogram in locating the lumbar interspinous space for spinal anesthesia in laboring parturients brought for elective cesarean section.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty parturients scheduled to undergo elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were included in this prospective randomized controlled trial, after obtaining the institutional ethical clearance. In Group I, 30 patients received spinal anesthesia by landmark technique and in Group II, 30 patients underwent ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia. The statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 17 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) for Microsoft windows.

RESULTS

The time taken for spinal in Group I was longer than in Group II (62 ± 18s; 41 ± 11s; = 0.0001). The number of attempts of needle insertion was significantly less in Group II (group I 1.86 ± 1.04: group II 1.06 ± 0.25). However, the total preparation time (28 8.30 ± 92 vs 804.73 ± 77; = 0.0001) was more in the ultrasound-guided than in the landmark group. The patients had better satisfaction in group II.

CONCLUSION

Preprocedural ultrasound is a useful tool for successful lumbar puncture in parturients as it minimizes the number of attempts of needle insertion and provides better patient satisfaction.

摘要

背景与目的

脊髓麻醉是剖宫产首选的区域麻醉技术,通常采用传统的体表标志技术进行操作。脊柱超声检查似乎有助于定位穿刺点并提高成功率。本研究的主要目的是评估超声检查在为择期剖宫产的临产产妇进行脊髓麻醉时定位腰椎棘突间隙的应用。

材料与方法

在获得机构伦理批准后,本前瞻性随机对照试验纳入了60例计划在脊髓麻醉下进行择期剖宫产的产妇。第一组30例患者采用体表标志技术进行脊髓麻醉,第二组30例患者接受超声引导下的脊髓麻醉。使用适用于微软视窗系统的SPSS软件17版(美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥市SPSS公司)进行统计分析。

结果

第一组脊髓麻醉所需时间比第二组长(62±18秒;41±11秒;P = 0.0001)。第二组的穿刺针插入尝试次数明显更少(第一组1.86±1.04;第二组1.06±0.25)。然而,超声引导组的总准备时间(288.30±92秒对804.73±77秒;P = 0.0001)比体表标志组更长。第二组患者的满意度更高。

结论

术前超声检查是产妇成功进行腰椎穿刺的有用工具,因为它能减少穿刺针插入的尝试次数并提高患者满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aec/8289655/0de4d164a1cf/JOACP-37-205-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aec/8289655/f7eb4e15c4a6/JOACP-37-205-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aec/8289655/e295c423c6cc/JOACP-37-205-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aec/8289655/0de4d164a1cf/JOACP-37-205-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aec/8289655/f7eb4e15c4a6/JOACP-37-205-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aec/8289655/e295c423c6cc/JOACP-37-205-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aec/8289655/0de4d164a1cf/JOACP-37-205-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the time taken for subarachnoid block using ultrasound-guided method versus landmark technique for cesarean section - A randomized controlled study.超声引导法与体表标志技术用于剖宫产蛛网膜下腔阻滞的时间比较——一项随机对照研究
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Apr-Jun;37(2):205-209. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_35_20. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
2
Ultrasound-Assisted Technology Versus the Conventional Landmark Location Method in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Obese Parturients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.超声辅助技术与传统地标定位法在肥胖产妇剖宫产椎管内麻醉中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Jul;129(1):155-161. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003795.
3
Landmark-guided versus modified ultrasound-assisted Paramedian techniques in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for elderly patients with hip fractures: a randomized controlled trial. landmarks 引导与改良超声辅助旁正中技术在老年髋部骨折患者联合脊麻-硬膜外麻醉中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Sep 28;20(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01172-x.
4
Comparison of landmark versus pre-procedural ultrasonography-assisted midline approach for identification of subarachnoid space in elective caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial.择期剖宫产术中标志性定位与术前超声引导中线入路识别蛛网膜下腔的比较:一项随机对照试验
Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Apr;62(4):280-284. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_488_17.
5
Preprocedural Ultrasonography Versus Landmark-Guided Spinal Anesthesia in Geriatric Patients with Difficult Anatomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial.老年解剖结构复杂患者术前超声检查与体表标志引导下脊髓麻醉的前瞻性随机试验
Eurasian J Med. 2021 Feb;53(1):9-14. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2020.20215. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
6
A randomized controlled trial of preinsertion ultrasound guidance for spinal anaesthesia in pregnancy: outcomes among obese and lean parturients: ultrasound for spinal anesthesia in pregnancy.一项针对妊娠产妇行脊髓麻醉前超声引导的随机对照试验:肥胖和瘦弱产妇的结局:妊娠时的脊髓麻醉超声。
J Anesth. 2014 Jun;28(3):413-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1726-1. Epub 2013 Oct 20.
7
Ultrasonography versus palpation for spinal anesthesia in obese parturients undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.超声引导与触诊用于肥胖产妇剖宫产术椎管内麻醉:一项随机对照试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Jan 11;49(1):41-48. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104272.
8
Conventional Landmark-Guided Midline Versus Preprocedure Ultrasound-Guided Paramedian Techniques in Spinal Anesthesia.脊髓麻醉中传统地标引导中线技术与术前超声引导旁正中技术的比较
Anesth Analg. 2015 Oct;121(4):1089-1096. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000911.
9
Ultrasound-Assisted Versus Landmark-Guided Spinal Anesthesia in Patients With Abnormal Spinal Anatomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.超声引导与体表标志定位引导在脊柱畸形患者中应用的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2020 Mar;130(3):787-795. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004600.
10
[Ultrasound imaging increases first-attempt success rate of neuraxial block in elderly patients].[超声成像提高老年患者神经轴阻滞首次尝试成功率]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Nov 22;96(43):3459-3463. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.43.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound-assisted spinal anesthesia in a parturient with scoliosis and moyamoya disease undergoing cesarean section: a case report.超声引导下脊柱麻醉用于一名患有脊柱侧弯和烟雾病的产妇剖宫产:病例报告
J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Jul 15;2025(7):rjaf479. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjaf479. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Ultrasound-assisted technique versus the conventional landmark location method in spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in parturients with class 3 obesity: a randomized controlled trial.超声辅助技术与传统体表标志定位法用于肥胖Ⅲ级产妇剖宫产脊髓麻醉的随机对照试验
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03176-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Management of anaesthesia for elective, low-risk (Category 4) caesarean section.择期低风险(4类)剖宫产的麻醉管理
Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Sep;62(9):667-674. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_459_18.
2
Comparison of landmark versus pre-procedural ultrasonography-assisted midline approach for identification of subarachnoid space in elective caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial.择期剖宫产术中标志性定位与术前超声引导中线入路识别蛛网膜下腔的比较:一项随机对照试验
Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Apr;62(4):280-284. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_488_17.
3
Pre-procedure ultrasound-guided paramedian spinal anaesthesia at L5-S1: Is this better than landmark-guided midline approach? A randomised controlled trial.
Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for neuraxial anaesthesia in adults.
成人神经轴索麻醉中超声引导与解剖标志定位的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 27;5(5):CD014964. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014964.pub2.
4
Recent advancements in regional anaesthesia.区域麻醉的最新进展。
Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Jan;67(1):63-70. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1021_22. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
5
Recent advances in obstetric anaesthesia and critical care.产科麻醉与危重症护理的最新进展。
Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Jan;67(1):19-26. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1032_22. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
L5-S1节段术前超声引导旁正中脊髓麻醉:这比体表标志引导的中线入路更好吗?一项随机对照试验。
Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;62(1):53-60. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_448_17.
4
Ultrasound to identify the lumbar space in women with impalpable bony landmarks presenting for elective caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia: a randomised trial.超声用于在脊柱麻醉下行择期剖宫产且骨性标志难以触及的女性中识别腰椎间隙:一项随机试验
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2016 Dec;28:12-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.007. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
5
Does Preprocedural Ultrasound Increase the First-Pass Success Rate of Epidural Catheterization Before Cesarean Delivery? A Randomized Controlled Trial.剖宫产术前超声是否能提高硬膜外导管置管的首次成功率?一项随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2017 Mar;124(3):851-856. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001325.
6
Lumbar Neuraxial Ultrasound for Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.用于脊髓和硬膜外麻醉的腰椎神经轴超声:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):251-60. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000184.
7
Failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.剖宫产脊髓麻醉失败。
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2011 Oct;1(4):1-17.
8
Spinal ultrasound versus palpation for epidural catheter insertion in labour: A randomised controlled trial.分娩时硬膜外导管置入术:脊髓超声与触诊的随机对照试验
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Jul;32(7):499-505. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000119.
9
A randomised controlled trial of ultrasound-assisted spinal anaesthesia.超声辅助脊髓麻醉的随机对照试验。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014 Mar;42(2):191-8. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1404200205.
10
A randomized controlled trial of preinsertion ultrasound guidance for spinal anaesthesia in pregnancy: outcomes among obese and lean parturients: ultrasound for spinal anesthesia in pregnancy.一项针对妊娠产妇行脊髓麻醉前超声引导的随机对照试验:肥胖和瘦弱产妇的结局:妊娠时的脊髓麻醉超声。
J Anesth. 2014 Jun;28(3):413-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1726-1. Epub 2013 Oct 20.