Jagadish Anguraj, Swaminathan Srinivasan, Bidkar Prasanna U, Gupta Suman L, Adinarayanan Sethuramachandran
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Apr-Jun;37(2):216-220. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_394_19. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
Lumbar epidural catheter insertion is conventionally performed by anesthesia residents by palpation of anatomical landmarks with relatively blind localization of epidural space which may lead to an increase in failure rate. We aim to compare the ease of lumbar epidural catheterization using prepuncture ultrasound as guidance with that of conventional palpatory technique. Comparisons were made with reference to number of insertion attempts, total time taken for the procedure, frequency of dural puncture, and overall satisfaction score as assessed by Likert's scale.
Eighty, ASA 1-3, patients undergoing elective surgeries requiring lumbar epidural catheterization were recruited for the study. Study participants were randomized into two groups. In group P, epidural catheterization was performed using the conventional palpatory method and in group U, it was performed with the help of ultrasound determined parameters. Number of insertion attempts, total time taken for successful insertion of epidural catheter, frequency of dural puncture, and overall satisfaction of ease of insertion as determined by Likert's scale were compared between both the groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software version 17 and value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The number of insertion attempts was significantly lesser in Group U ( = 0.019). The total procedure time was significantly higher in group U ( < .001). There was no significant difference in ease of insertion score, as measured by Likert's scale between both the groups ( = 0.45).
Prepuncture ultrasound guidance improves the first attempt success rate of lumbar epidural catheterization with reduced incidence of dural puncture with similar overall satisfaction score but increases the total time taken for the procedure when compared to conventional palpatory technique.
传统上,腰椎硬膜外导管插入术由麻醉住院医师通过触诊解剖标志来进行,硬膜外间隙定位相对盲目,这可能导致失败率增加。我们旨在比较使用穿刺前超声引导进行腰椎硬膜外导管插入术与传统触诊技术的难易程度。根据插入尝试次数、手术总时间、硬膜穿刺频率以及由李克特量表评估的总体满意度得分进行比较。
招募80例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为1 - 3级、需要进行腰椎硬膜外导管插入术的择期手术患者进行研究。研究参与者被随机分为两组。P组采用传统触诊方法进行硬膜外导管插入术,U组借助超声确定的参数进行操作。比较两组之间的插入尝试次数、成功插入硬膜外导管的总时间、硬膜穿刺频率以及由李克特量表确定的插入操作总体满意度。使用SPSS统计软件17版对数据进行分析,P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
U组的插入尝试次数显著较少(P = 0.019)。U组的手术总时间显著更长(P <.001)。两组之间由李克特量表测量的插入操作难易程度得分无显著差异(P = 0.45)。
与传统触诊技术相比,穿刺前超声引导提高了腰椎硬膜外导管插入术首次尝试成功率,降低了硬膜穿刺发生率,总体满意度得分相似,但增加了手术总时间。